Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Z and the Diversity Curve

Posted by Bob on November 4th, 2007 under Coaching Session


I’ve just came across “The Untrained Eye” audio broadcasts on Bob’s Website. Very rarely do I listen to something so closely. If I don’t hear something right, I rewind it and listen to it again. These recordings are a wealth of ideas/facts/truths that I would recommend to anyone who’s interested in understanding Whitakerism.

I’m starting to realize that everything we need is located at this website. After spending time at the others, I can see why people sound so pessimistic. Enough Stormfront can result in being put on suicide watch.

Whitakerism is a doctrine of understanding, recognizing , and gaining power. Its too practical to waste time on the latest black on White crime. Its a “lean production” system which has vertically disintegrated all components that harm its efficiency. Its similar to a “Just-in-time” production strategy because it doesn’t waste resources on warehousing “bad news.” It has an comparative advantage on practical power projection. The manta produces more in one page than what dozens of books and websites have produced. That’s lean production. That’s post-Fordism.

What the Germans and Japanese did for the car industry, Whitakerism is doing for the White survival industry. It was while reading this site, I came up with the Diversity Price Curve. It goes as follows.

“Multiculturalism works just like an economic price curve. As we all know, when prices go up, demand goes down. The same is true for diversity. When the number of non-whites increases, the tolerance for them goes down.”

Of course I’m working on refining it. But the point is, it was this place which enabled me to expand my thoughts.

This is enough for now. I will return with more later.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Dave on 11/04/2007 - 5:04 pm

    What BUGS is really about is the brilliance of Robert Whitaker.

    Robert Whitaker has stated, “There are two Europe’s, one in Europe and one in America, but there is only one America (the America that insists on being free)”.

    No other statement more succinctly sums up all of American history. The power of his statement is enormous.

    I once looked at a book that republished the “big news” front pages of the NY Times since its inception in 1842.

    From 1842 until 1865 the news was all about the events leading to and completing the Civil War. From 1865 until 1945, the news was all about events in Europe. From 1945 onwards the news was about Israel.

    That’s all. That’s it.

    But what is Israel?

    Israel is a story of WW I and WW II in Europe. Israel is fundamentally a European story.

    It made me realize, that despite our wars with Japan, Korea, China, and Vietnam, despite our forays into Asian and Latin American colonialism, the real story of America is America’s struggle to break with the traditions, culture, and maelstroms of European tyranny.

    Nothing has changed: America is still in a struggle with Europe’s chains. Abraham’s Lincoln’s propositional state was a European import. It had no provenance in America.
    The “fair labor” standards that dismantled the Jim Crow system were European imports. They had no provenance in America. Political correctness was a European import. It had no provenance in America. Our current “budgets and administrators first” public school system is a European import, it had no provenance in America.

    Robert Whitaker is a great guide, a great guide to the real struggle. Thank God, via the Internet, his voice can be heard.

  2. #2 by Z on 11/05/2007 - 2:14 am

    The power structure is loosing control people. This “house” is getting wobbly and the elite are getting out the duct tape with this bill.

    The bill is called HR 1955 Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007. Here’s a summery of it:

    4/19/2007–Introduced.
    Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 – Amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to add provisions concerning the prevention of homegrown terrorism (terrorism by individuals born, raised, or based and operating primarily in the United States).
    Directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to: (1) establish a grant program to prevent radicalization (use of an extremist belief system for facilitating ideologically-based violence) and homegrown terrorism in the United States; (2) establish or designate a university-based Center of Excellence for the Study of Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism in the United States; and (3) conduct a survey of methodologies implemented by foreign nations to prevent radicalization and homegrown terrorism.
    Prohibits the Department of Homeland Security’s efforts to prevent ideologically-based violence and homegrown terrorism from violating the constitutional and civil rights, and civil liberties, of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents.

    You can probably guess who they’re worried about? Chances are, they don’t wear rags on their heads. They keep it real vague in order to make it easy to target anyone. The best line is # 3, where they talk about “surveying methodologies implemented by foreign nations to prevent radicalization and homegrown terrorism.”

    I wonder who they have in mind? Canada? Germany? France maybe? Its coming kiddies, “Hate-speech Laws” and Internet censorship is on its way. While Stormfront gets put on suicide watch, here’s a few things to think about.

    As many of you know, the media likes to portray us as a bunch of guys who wear Nazi costumes and swastikas. But what are they going to do when its illegal to be one of those clowns? One of their most effective weapons will be gone. By forcing the more radical WN to tone down their stupid costume parties, they won’t be able to call us all Nazis anymore. This bill will do what we’ve been asking the Nazis to do for years, go away. Who would of thought the elite would be so kind?

  3. #3 by Z on 11/05/2007 - 2:27 am

    I highly suggest you all listen to the audio shows Bob made. In just 3 days of listening, I’m already better off. In fact, for new people here, I would suggest that you at least listen to the may 7th, 14th, and 28th shows, before you start posting here. I’m going to start bringing some of the ideas from the shows over to the blog.

  4. #4 by Z on 11/05/2007 - 11:09 pm

    Times are a changing folks. Read this article.

    ————————————–
    Residents of Howard Beach, Queens, rallied Saturday night to demand that five black and Hispanic youths busted in the beating of a white teen be charged with hate crimes.

    “Enough is enough,” more than 150 people shouted as they marched down 157th Ave. near Wednesday night’s attack, which left 16-year-old Joseph Friedman with seven staples in his head.

    They also chanted, “Free Fat Nick,” referring to Nicholas Minucci, who is serving 15 years for bludgeoning a black man in a bias attack in the neighborhood in 2005.

    Largely white Howard Beach became a flashpoint for racial tensions in 1986, when a dozen white teens chased Michael Griffith, a 23-year-old black man, to his death on the Belt Parkway.

    It is unclear how the violence began Wednesday, but the five suspects, all from Brooklyn, have been charged with assault, menacing and weapons possession. Witnesses gave conflicting accounts of whether the young men came at a group of white teenagers with sticks or whether the white youths first hurled eggs and racial epithets.

    Police sources said the Hate Crime Task Force has located several witnesses who heard anti-white statements made before the attack.
    —————————————-

    These people had a bigger rally than most SF or VNN produced rallies! Did you see what the black excuse was? “They called us names.” Here’s the link:

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime_file/2007/11/04/2007-11-04_howard_beach_rally_claims_antiwhite_bias-1.html

  5. #5 by Z on 11/06/2007 - 3:43 am

    The other day I was looking at the SPLC’s and ADL’s websites. I was looking for anything they may have written about Bob. To my surprise, there wasn’t much there. There was a small mention of Bob in relation to the Political Cesspool but that was about it. I couldn’t figure out why? After all, Pat Buchanan is mentioned a lot and he doesn’t push the PC envelop anywhere near as much as Bob does.

    And then I figured it out. Bob is too dangerous to mention. No, not dangerous in any physical way. But dangerous in a political way. Think about it, here’s an ex-Reagan official who’s been around Politics for 50 years. You would think Liberals would point out Bob, just to show the public how “racist” Reagan and the Conservatives were and are. They could easily take something out of context and use Bob’s former status to bash conservatives. So why don’t they?

    Its very simple, making a big deal out of this former Reagan official will cause people to know about him. And if people know about him, they’ll visit his website. And if they visit his website, they’ll read his ideas and that’s DANGEROUS!

    So the power structure gets more utility out of not talking about Bob than they would by smearing him and connecting him to the Conservative (bowel) “movement.”

    Bob Whitaker, TOO DANGEROUS to acknowledge.

You must be logged in to post a comment.