Archive for November 4th, 2007

Socialism, Hindsight, and the IQ Obsession

In 1950, the hundreds of men on the Ford assembly line were far smarter than all the thousands of brilliant people who had gone before in that industry. The assembly line men were smarter than all the Fords, Edisons and all the thousands who had made small and large improvements to auto design.

If you are not college trained, you won’t understand this. You see, the assembly line produced a 1950 car, whereas none of those thousands of smart people and originators and geniuses could not make a car that was that fast or well-designed.

This was the logic every college student learned. It was called socialism. College professors taught them that the way for third world countries to develop was to bypass all the old-fashioned market stuff and have professors from the London School of Economics and Harvard plan out how they could go from a 1500 AD economy to a 1950 economy without all that waste of time, money and energy growing in a market framework.

The geniuses Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin, they were told, could put together a truly efficient and planned production-distribution network as could their successor intellectuals.

We also learned that Orientals are smarter than Westerners. The Japanese jumped from Asian poverty to first-world status in a single generation, just as the assembly line workers could produce a modern car. Professors, Orientals, and assembly line workers were clearly superior creatures.

When Japan reached a Western level, a level already reached by the West, their miraculous brilliance stopped. When 1950 assembly line workers produced a 1950 car, their genius reached its final stage. Socialist economies didn’t even get there.

Orientals were able to reach the white living standard before hitting a brick wall. Black cannot get there, copy as they might. Socialism kept white Eastern Europe to a third world level. So Orientals are better than blacks. Socialism can’t even COPY, so any form of market economy is superior to that, just as Orientals are superior to blacks.

But the IQ obsession teaches that Orientals can copy, and are therefore equal. An assembly line, says the IQ obsession, is smarter than the inventors.

If you have a college degree, you truly cannot imagine that anything is wrong with that logic.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Comments

Z and the Diversity Curve

I’ve just came across “The Untrained Eye” audio broadcasts on Bob’s Website. Very rarely do I listen to something so closely. If I don’t hear something right, I rewind it and listen to it again. These recordings are a wealth of ideas/facts/truths that I would recommend to anyone who’s interested in understanding Whitakerism.

I’m starting to realize that everything we need is located at this website. After spending time at the others, I can see why people sound so pessimistic. Enough Stormfront can result in being put on suicide watch.

Whitakerism is a doctrine of understanding, recognizing , and gaining power. Its too practical to waste time on the latest black on White crime. Its a “lean production” system which has vertically disintegrated all components that harm its efficiency. Its similar to a “Just-in-time” production strategy because it doesn’t waste resources on warehousing “bad news.” It has an comparative advantage on practical power projection. The manta produces more in one page than what dozens of books and websites have produced. That’s lean production. That’s post-Fordism.

What the Germans and Japanese did for the car industry, Whitakerism is doing for the White survival industry. It was while reading this site, I came up with the Diversity Price Curve. It goes as follows.

“Multiculturalism works just like an economic price curve. As we all know, when prices go up, demand goes down. The same is true for diversity. When the number of non-whites increases, the tolerance for them goes down.”

Of course I’m working on refining it. But the point is, it was this place which enabled me to expand my thoughts.

This is enough for now. I will return with more later.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Comments

Tim

dit) “Unfortunately, some Americans realize that Europe is in for a disaster but seem to think that it is only getting what it deserves. Europe has to be destroyed by the Muslims as a punishment for the Nazis’ crimes during WWII. Last year, I was invited to speak about the situation in Europe at one of America’s major universities. For two days my host subjected me to the most terrible accusations. He told me I would have to suffer for what my ancestors had done to his ancestors. “One cannot respect the Europeans,” he said. “America should have nuked Europe during WWII instead of Japan. If ever things turn nasty in Europe I will make sure that neither you nor any white European will be allowed to seek shelter in the US. I would rather invite the Muslims in than you and your lot, because one can respect Muslims but not Europeans.” Since my host was Jewish and had lost his family in the war I could understand his anger, but not his short-sightedness. I think he did not mean all he said, though it was an upsetting experience and one of the most unpleasant moments in my life.”

Bob was right. Jews hate us more than they love their own children. I wonder how many NeoCons this applies to. There is an interesting article people on BUGS should be aware of over at the Brussels Journal.

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/2592

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

7 Comments