Archive for December 22nd, 2007

Will Our Side EVER Understand How to Take Advantage of an Enemy Mistake ?!

White Pioneer put this in Stormfront.

It was, of course, largely ignored:

Quote:

A reminder that the Anti-Racism forum is not a place for white people to talk about “racism” against them. I would argue that a progressive discussion board is no place for that either.

bigcitygal volunteer moderator (anti-racism forum)

MY COMMENT:

REPEAT THIS!

Bang their heads with it!

REPEAT THIS, PLEASE!

A reminder that the Anti-Racism forum is not a place for white people to talk about “racism” against them. I would argue that a progressive discussion board is no place for that either.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

Gerontocracy

Dave says, below:

“McCain and Kennedy are very old men to be emblematic of the world circa 2008 and their careers since 1981 could not be more ironic.”

ME:

This just now hit me:

In our age, every big change has been preceded by a gerontocracy. The USSR, just before it died, appointed leaders who were on the respirator weeks after taking “power.”

In China, the new “leaders” died off as fast as they were elected. To get this out of Communism, the Vatican kept electing popes who died as fast as they were elected just before John Paul.

You don’t have to be old to be a gerontocrat. The establishment just gave us a Bush after a Bush. Now it offers us a Clinton to replace a Clinton. I don’t think there is a precedent for this in American history.

They’re running out of SOMETHING.

AGAIN.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Comments

The Meaning of Praise

Some people used to accuse me of having pet students here, those that praised me. I explained why this seemed so, and something happened that simply is not supposed to happen in this world.

My critics read what I said, nodded, and stopped accusing me. That has not happened to me in any other forum. When I encounter reasonable people, after the life I have led, it seems like I’m either on Mars or on drugs.

What I explained was this:

I am USED to criticism. Most of the criticism I receive I have heard, literally, hundreds of times. It is simple logic that most of the people who learn from what I say also think I am a great guy for saying it.

On the other hand, if you will read over the years of my writing here, you will find that I declare that I was just plain wrong an awful lot.

In fact, this is a key to my learning process. If I believe something, fact or opinion, I STATE it. This takes a degree of moral courage that is rare in our day, because I get shot down a LOT. I have spent over half a century getting shot down to my great public embarrassment. But each time I admitted I was wrong, and after awhile I found out it really doesn’t hurt if I do it that way.

Only an Aryan mind grasps the full difference between theory and doctrine. Being wrong in any other “Great Civilization” got you killed. If you read Soviet history, it is routine that a professor who was adjudged wrong was soon arrested.

I explained that I had met a lot of Great Names and gotten more out of them than anyone else. With others they were very careful. No one who talked to them found out any more than they had written. But I did a little homework first. I would make the very comment that they hated most of all, almost right, but just wrong enough to sound like what they were debating in the journals that very moment.

To put it in Classical Latin, I passed them off, big time. The gloves came off. They started from the basics and lectured me on the whole subject; all pretense of subtlety went right out the window.

Which happens to be exactly what you want from someone whose expertise is precisely what you want to get at. I got a LOT of info others would have paid a fortune for. Ashbrook thought I was a genius at probing.

My Southern accent got very pronounced in those cases. Everybody thinks it means DUMB. Once Ashbrook gave one of his enormous grins while I was suing this technique, and I actually had to surreptitiously shake my head vigorously at my boss to get that damned grin off his face so the guy I was talking to wouldn’t see it.

Now let’s apply this to cases. The whole point of my being is that, when they finally lynch me, YOU will have the way of thinking I do.

I DO notice that on Stormfront when some anti-white makes a point against me, Lord Nelson and others of my students come right in and answer them.

You could say, “Oh, they’re just parroting Whitaker! All he’s got is bunch of sycophants!”

You’re not reading carefully. If you do, you will begin to note that I am using my students EXTENSIONS of this kind of thinking. More and more, my writing consists of comments on what my students said.

It’s called an intellectual EXCHANGE. It is unique to Western Civilization.

To a teacher, it is also called SUCCESS.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

1 Comment

Simmons and My Idea of Art

PC or liberalism or whatever this psychological dementia is called is nothing, ask of it or its cult members the right questions and it goes away.

— Simmons

ME:

Other people like paintings or poetry.

The only art I really enjoy is when someone puts a huge truth into a few perfect words, as Simmons does here.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

Dave

McCain and Kennedy are very old men to be emblematic of the world circa 2008 and their careers since 1981 could not be more ironic.

1981 was a banner year for reasons the “body politic” of today is entirely blind. No one today even remembers or knows how deeply America was mired in the quicksand’s of urban unemployment all throughout the rural to urban migrations that ran in earnest from the 1920s through the mid-1960s.

That is what makes 1981 a banner year. There was 16-year lag between 1981 and the mid-1960s but the end of 1981 finally adjusted things. It was a dividing line between societies in which jobs became chronically plentiful and one where jobs were chronically scarce.

But today this fact is entirely ignored. Lightweights such as McCain and Kennedy (and the Bushes) never could have persisted in their prominence were it not for a prosperity that they bear no responsibility for. Their reign is only fortuitous. They themselves are completely ignorant of what lightweights they really are.

Oddly, I don’t think the Clinton’s are ignorant of it. Maybe it is their Arkansas background.

But I think that the whole thing is changing again. 2008 will be a banner year like 1981. It is not that I think that we are headed back into the quicksands of high unemployment. It is almost more onerous.

State and local governments have nowhere to go for their financing except to higher taxes. They have played the booms for all they are worth, and now this is over. State and local governments are no different than private corporations. Their bond capacity is limited, unlike the Feds.

But all of America cannot sustain NYC or Nassau County tax levels. The white populations will rebel and this has already started. At heart, this is racial conflict because state and local taxes heavily grab white savings to redistribute to nonwhite populations in devious ways.

The state and local police and judges are not up to suppressing this rebellion. Without Federal backup, they will chicken out, if it starts in earnest. I predict Federal backup will not be forthcoming. This is not the 1960s.

Both Kennedy and McCain are in their dotage. They don’t have a clue, and they certainly are not up to navigating this. This is way too “South American” for them.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 Comments