Archive for November, 2008

A Serious World View Must Take Into Account What We Don’t Know Yet

I discussed the piece on The Family Guy where the girl used the old hippie, “Only Man has wars,” and Death made an idiot of her, “What are you talking about? Animals kill each other all the time!”

Today the entire audience of Family Guy, including the YUPPIE college grads, know that border wars are routine and merciless among all social animals. It is a ruling theme in the wildly popular meerkat saga.

But in the 1960s, no one had any idea of this. Even the chimpanzee lady in Africa would then have SWORN that chimps did NOT patrol their borders and kill alien chimps who violated them. Now even the most brain-dead college grad knows it.

The problem is that people get only one lesson at a time. This is why a continuing theme here is “obsessing on examples.” Yes, the fact that all the experts were unbelievably wrong about war being only a man-made institution underlay all 1960s thought. Yes, that particular discovery made those particular hippies–Marxists–ideas laughable.

But there is a repeat of an old lesson here, one that no one EVER takes into account. It is more general than an obsession with taking The Latest Thing into account. It is that you must not build your world on ANY Latest Thing.

Which is why I keep hitting “News and Jews.” The lesson here is that there will be another Latest Thing that will make your present Latest Thing yesterday’s news. This is so obvious that no one SEES it.” Another theme I beat to death here.

PEOPLE ARE ALWAYS PREDICTING THE FUTURE BASED ON THE LATEST THING, BUT THEY NEVER TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE FACT THAT THERE WILL BE MORE LATEST THINGS.

Back when I was still semi-respectable, I made this obvious point and was listened to. It was a generation ago when the discovery of early man’s predecessors was going full tilt. in reaction to Ardrey’s African Genesis. Each time a new, older predecessor was found, articles would say, “The earliest human ancestor has just been found at X,” and there would be cluster of Expert Opinions based on the Latest Thing fact that all mankind came from Spot X.

Everybody wanted to be The New Ardrey. His concept that man’s advance began with his dining a shinbone as a weapon began the hit movie 2001. It was all the rage. So each time a new discovery was made, it was supposed to rewrite the whole of human evolutionary history.

This happened over and over. It got comical.

Finally I pointed out in Science News that this was silly. After ten articles reporting “the earliest man,” any reasonably intelligent person would cut the crap and write about “the earliest ancestor SO FAR FOUND.”

I was astonished at the result. Those article not only changed in Science News, they changed in Time and US News and World Report! The whole phenomenon STOPPED. That is a lot of power for one person. The reason I exercised that power was that nobody but me even noticed it.

I have utilized this kind of power my whole life. We have this kind of power precisely because it is not a power anyone else WANTS. Outside of BUGS, people do not want power, they want to RECOGNIZED as the person who exercises power.

I have made fundamental changes at the top of the chain of ideas all my life. I have exercised more raw power than ANY expert in ANY field.

I had the field clear to exercise this power precisely because no one NOTICED it. No one but us BUGS types wants REAL power, which is the ability to change to change the ideas that make the world of the future. They do not want this power because it does not lead to fame or a full professorship or even a footnote in anybody’s book.

Which is why I keep repeating, “They can have the titles, they can have the money, they can have the fame. I just want to rule the world.”

I keep emphasizing the general point that all the frontline Movements are based on the Latest Thing, but nobody builds his world view around the fact that there will be NEW insights, NEW developments. No Movement, no professor, has even TRIED to build his world view on this most obvious of realities. If you don’t believe me, go back and look at the cries of articles in the1970s about “the earliest man has been found at …” and the whole New World views that were based on each one until my Science News bit appeared.

To understand this, you have to THINK about another point I keep making, “Why do people SAY things?”

I have been interviewed by a LOT of writers and I know what they want. The one time my picture was on the front page of the New York Times I got it there by practically writing the guys’ article for him. I knew EXACTLY the quotes a working newspaper writer needed and I had them ready. When he left my office, he was practically dancing on air.

With that experience, I can picture a writer doing an article on The Latest Scientific Discovery when I say, “the real lesson here is that MORE new discoveries will be made.” He would be on his way out the door.

This leads directly to another lesson I keep hammering at ’til you are sick of it: “Why do people SAY things?” A writer, whether he is writing for a scientific publication or the National Inquirer, needs quotes that emphasize the IMPORTANCE of the story he is trying to publish about The Latest Thing. Above all, he does NOT want someone putting his rave news into “perspective.”

Unless you understand “Why do people SAY things?” the idea that ten articles in a row said that, “It has just been discovered that man’s earliest ancestor was in…” seems incredible, not just coming from a science writer, but from any adult who is not actually retarded.

No one would have written what I wrote in Science News if he didn’t understand, “Why do people SAY things?” I wrote it because I understand that when people write silly things there is a reason for it, usually a reason that has nothing to do with Jews or some other obsession.

The lesson of “News and Jews” has nothing to do with news, and nothing to do with Jews.

That is the POINT.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Comments

AFKAN Now and What We Don’t Know Yet

The issue of how culture goes to seed in Race – a big issue, for obvious reasons – just got a big kick forward.

See this:
http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S22/60/95O56/index.xml?section=topstories

In essence, they are defining the actual mechanism of epigenetics – a term that is widely used, and misused.

The genetic component of Human evolution just took a big step forward.

These, and other developments, are happening at a rate undreamt of by our ancestors.

I’ll state this again:

Homo Novus will walk the Earth by the turn of the next century, and just might look at us as we do at house pets.

The Race Issue just took first place, in all realms of development, and no one – publicly – outside this blog seems to even both to care, much less try to understand.

Damn, but I feel like The Gods are looking at the Obama Coronation, and are saying, “Just wait. WE control The Long Game.”

Fine.

While the exact point AFKAN raises here is worth discussion, there is a more general lesson behind it that is CRITICAL to any accurate vision of the future: WHAT WE DON’T KNOW YET.

I will discuss that in a new article,

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Comments

Creativity and 9.3

The world record for the hundred yard dash the last time I looked was 9.3 seconds.

Have you ever watched an “international” sprint competition? You see nine racers competing, all of them black. The “Swedish” entry is black. The “German” entry is black.

They’re ALL black and nobody expects anything different. But the Genome Project assures us that under the skin we are all “modern humans.”

But if skin color makes no difference, this presents an obvious problem.

There is another race, one which makes infinitely more difference to the future of humanity than a new sprint record. Call it the Standard of Living competition. In this lineup you have white majority countries and brown countries.

Once again, there is no competition. It is entirely a matter of color. In sprints non-blacks are non-starters. Every country with black skin or mulatto skin is a non-starter.

This lesson of the sprints is so obvious no one notices it.

You see, in order for it to be noticed, someone has to POINT IT OUT.

And if the only person pointing it out is a tired old man called Bob, truth is being shortchanged.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Comments

Tim

Bob,

What was the actual date you announced the start of the new holocaust? Wasn’t it at the start of the Iraq war?

(I cannot find your post)

Recently, I have heard enough comments about “Jew bankers on Wallstreet” to make Hitler blush. And many of the comments from rich self hating white liberals. I recalled your comment years ago.

Jews should have hired Bob Whitaker as an adviser.

It is ironic that Stormfronters and White Nationalists ALWAYS talk about the blinders that Aryans have on their eyes. They never mention that the Jews are actually in a much more precarious position. We have a counter culture structure. We can take power one way or another, consolidate and rebuild. They cannot. It is all or nothing for the Neocons.

I am sorry but we don’t hold a candle to the Jews. Jews have that same gene that makes the moths fly into the flame…and they fly into the flame every time. Jews are not renegades. They do exactly what the rabbi’s tell them to do……and always end up in a holocaust.

good call Bob

I realized the Mantra about twenty years ago. But when you get a truth that is so obvious it is not noticed you have a serious problem with it. Nobody listens.

BUGS people know this, but that is why you are BUGS people. We understand this so well that it hard for you to fully put yourself in my position BEFORE BUGS. My whole life was spent coming up with devastating, simple effective statements of the truth that no one would USE.

If you listen to my interviews you will see this. You see what I am trying to get across. But the interviewer’s attitude is “That’s good, too, and this is the point I make.” He wants to make many points, I want to make one.

I do not ask that my point be the ONLY one. Far from it. The Mantra clears the way for a person on our side to make his OTHER points. No one can understand that. The other side has a world view that makes us the villains. But as you have noticed, once you make the Mantra clear, once you attack their whole world view with the TRUTH of white genocide, the entire debate changes.

Otherwise the discussion is the same against the same old. If you do NOT start with my point and ram it home, the guy on the other side simply slips into his usual hypnosis. He repeats his stuff and you repeat yours. You must begin by overturning the world view he depends on.

I spent decades trying to explain this and if you listen to any of my interviews you will hear what happened thousands of times during those decades. The person interviewing me says, “That’s a good point. Here are some more good points.”

I was paid as a political advisor. If someone PAYS you they take you seriously. So if I sat down with an elected official and said, “This is the way you use this” he listened carefully.

He listened carefully because, in a real political battle, my advice WORKED. That is why he PAID me. A political advisor lives with the phrase, “what have you done for me LATELY?” What you provide had better work all the time, or you’re out.

The reason Tim joins the Mantra timing with Iraq is because 9/11 coincided generally with the time I was trying to explain the Mantra strategy on Stormfront. I tried broadcasts, I tried speaking at conventions, I put in hundreds of posts, but everybody said that the Important Thing was Iraq.

So I gave up on that and concentrated on what became BUGS. My decades of expertise told me that a handful of people who would LISTEN to the Mantra Strategy and CONCENTRATE on a strategy that WORKS are important. People who want to spend their time repeating the old line for yet another front page obsession are useless.

Not that I disagreed with them. You simply cannot do the same old thing and expect different results.

“You simply cannot do the same old thing and expect different results.” That is the definition of insanity. But what if what you have always said is TRUE? Then obviously you must find a new way to put it that SELLS.

“Then obviously you must find a new way to put it that SELLS.”

And that, boys and girls, is what the Mantra is all about. It is a different way of telling the truth. Try to explain that to people. Or listen to my interviews as I tried to explain it. Or read Stormfront where I tried to explain it.

It takes years to come up with a basic truth. But then you have to get it across to the people on your own side.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Comments

Shari and Our New Shah

Shari READS what I write. She remembered that the last shah who ruled Zoroastrian Iran was a mulatto. Zoroastrian religion was limited to Aryans. The original Olympic Oath included the declaration that the athlete was “of pure Hellenic blood.” The original Sanskrit term for caste meant “color.”

Every former Great Civilization which has gone down and STAYED down, just coincidentally, now consists of people with a brown skin. In other words, each collapsed society consists of people the Greeks and the Zoroastrians and all other Indo-Europeans SPECIFICALLY excluded.

The Party Line is now that Indo-Europeans were just a LANGUAGE group.

It don’t wash.

The religion of Political Correctness now has a mulatto president of the United States. Political Correctness, like late Zoroastrianism, developed from an earlier racist outlook.

Universalism turns society brown, as the Mantra says, and brown skin is fatal.

I don’t think the parallel is exact. But it IS interesting.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

18 Comments