The truth of a rule may be shown by it having no exceptions, but it is more often demonstrated by how desperate the search for an exception is.

No matter how endlessly the paper hats get others to praise their bravery and modestly deny it, not one of the endless number I have met ever said that he had anything to do with the OUTCOME of the conflict he was part of.

Someone who walks around with a paper hat saying World War II Veteran is saying that he fought in a war whose only real result was turning one third of the human race over to the Communists.

To repeat, this is true of ALL paper hats. Korea ended up exactly where it started, Vietnam was lost as soon as the left turned to back their fellow Marxists. Vietnam was a replay of World War II, because it was decided at the desks of leftists.

And so on.

Even the old text on world military history at West Point made it a major point that one side is defeated when it DECIDES it is defeated. All the slaughters and artillery and medals are devoted to the same thing other propaganda is aimed at: CONVINCING.

All real wars are decided before the first shot is fired.

Paper hats are concerned only about themselves, how brave they were and how they can‘t be cowards because the government said so. But not ONE of the paper hats claims he had anything to do with historical, human RESULTS.,

Paper hats are useful — to those who know how to use them — as hostages. So Hitler was really really bad and Comrade Stalin had his points, if you don’t agree you are condemning all those brave men and women who fought against Hitler, and, incidentally, as allies of Stalin.

But when it comes to the real war, it is fought here, in convincing people.

No ten thousand medal winners even claim to have the effect that well-placed and disciplined words have on the real world

In Part I I explained why the ex-slaves interviewed in the 1930s WPA program had almost nothing bad to say about slavery.

My point has nothing to do with slavery. My point is that a side which controls communication grows ever more unrealistic.

That is why they cannot handle this WPA project. So they ignore it. As time passes the things one militantly ignores get to be a bigger and bigger stack insulating you from reality.

Reality, by its nature, has a lot of staying power.

I explained that this strange complimentary image of slavery in the only interviews with actual slaves, not by using it as an anti-slavery screed or as a neo-Confederate, but by simply addressing the reality. Why did these ex-slaves themselves produce this information?

First, because when they were interviewed they were old and ill.

My second point here is that this survey was conducted during the DEPRESSION.

There is a lot of truth in the joke the black comedian George Wallace made:

“Oh, yea, I know about slavery,

that was the last time all the black folks had JOBS.”

Anti-whites are so dedicated to the evils of the white world that they get utterly deaf to any inconvenient reality. I was explaining to a new Political Science PhD that one complaint against the apartheid regime in South Africa was that the government did not protect black labor against black immigration.

She had never heard that, but understood. Then she defended her Orthodoxy by replying, “Yes, but all those blacks only wanted to go to South Africa to work for food.”

My reply, which caused a roomful of laughs, was to say, naively, “You know, when you’re starving, food is pretty important.” The rest of the room was laughing, but to her this was the kind of statement they report to the European Thought Police.

In the desperate 1930s, an old black man might not see his condition as better then it would have been under slavery. You could fire an old black man in the 1930s when it was hopeless for him to find any job. At that time, even for favored groups, a JOB, a LIVING, had a priority none of Mom Professor Acolytes, as I show above, can even imagine.

Black immigration under apartheid was almost entirely FROM the New Independent African Republics and INTO South Africa because of a priority no anti-white can actually SEE.

An old, old black man in the late 1930s had been YOUNG when he was a slave and, the ultimate priority in the 1930s, he was SAFE.

Notice that I am not defending slavery. I am explaining realities that anti-whites cannot deal with because their only strategy is militant denial.

Year by year, because of this denial, any simple mention of basic truth, like the Mantra, hits them in areas in which they have never learned to cope

Under the New Deal, a project was set up to employ writers. To find something to pay them for, young writers were sent South to talk to actual ex-slaves. This was actually useful, because almost all the real slaves had died out.

It is interesting to note that, with all the discussion of the Civil War and slavery, no one in the New York Union League Club or in New England had the slightest interest in how the SLAVES felt about it. This was strictly government make-work policy which could not possibly pay its way from any reader interest in it.

I haven’t seen this study mentioned anywhere popular. The results were enormously frustrating for the earnest young liberals doing it. If you published it outside the United States right now, you would probably go to prison.

I can explain why the blacks were so kind to slavery and their slave holders. But a person whose reaction to a study that comes out the wrong way is to militantly ignore it, is very weak on the realities of the world.

That, in fact, is one the major advantages of Mantra thought.

Slavery had ended say 75 years before this study was made. There were very few blacks who were actually slaves by then, and I would bet good money that far more than half of those interviewed were lying. But every one of the hundreds of interviewees had know a lot of people who had been actual slaves, and they probably repeated what they had been told.

So I am using this to review slavery, as everybody else on both sides does, but also to examine why slave days were given such an embarrassing boost that frustrated the writers.

First of all, the old slaves were talking about a time when they were young With 1930 medicine, even at its best, old age was MUCH worse then than it is now.

Also, most of the children in that slave group probably didn’t know what slavery WAS. I distinctly remember when my mother told me there had been a war between the North and the South. Slavery is not what they remembered, so what DID they remember?

A child remembers being energetic and healthy, but he also remembers HOME. In the 1850s, when abolitionist preachers were making huge salaries in New England, an Irish child of ten who was crippled in an accident, a very common thing, was left to starve or as a burden on his parents.

So why was this information produced? First, because the ex-slaves were no longer young. No one surveyed the old Irishmen who had worked as kids amidst the machinery that paid New England’s abolitionists’ handsome incomes

Second, this survey was conducted during the Depression.

–To Be Continued

I can’t find it, but one of our BUGSERS went into a pub, found a bunch of degree-holding anti-whites putting down a girl who stood up for our race, and he took them on and took them out.

He said, “Anyone who hast outgrown his college education knows that anti -racist is a code word for anti-white.”

Almost immediately, instead of those prigs ganging up on the girl, he had the whole room on his side. It was a major triumph.

And the commenter TOLD US that it was a triumph.

His method throws light on the discussions of whether one should use the R word or part of the Mantra.

Once again, let me emphasize that the goal of other pro-white sites is necessarily raising money and raising memberships. Only by doing that can they make a living and have numbers to cite.

BUGS has one criterion: success in giving out the world view anti-whites have imposed on the world.

It goes back to the tired, tired, old joke about a guy who jumps into a cab and says, “What’s the best way to get to Carnegie Hall?” and the cabby answers, “Practice, practice, practice.”

People keep asking me how I developed the Mantra. The ONLY reply is practice, practice, practice.

But practice is useless if you do not have a feel for the target.

Other comments may say “I use the argument that …”

But that does not answer the question. The question is, did you hit the target?

BUGSERS begin where theorizers stop.

The brilliant gamut above did a major job. But what followed? Did he use the attention to give everyone the real world view of ALL white countries and ONLY white countries are being immigrated out of existence.

And that is a relatively easy case to make. It is the assimilation, i.e., INTERMARRIAGE, which is the line they cannot have crossed. is a safe topic by comparison. If we cut immigration to a trickle and just marry in the non-whites we have now, there will be no white race.

You never hit the target dead center enough to suit your rifle coach, which can really tick you off if you are more accurate than HE is and he still says YOU aren’t living up to what YOU could do.

So I congratulate you with jubilation when you pull off a coup like this one, Then I want to know what happened NEXT.

We are not theoretical here. BUGS is interested in results from the whole front, and ONLY the front.