Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Untouchables II: In Group/Out Group & Input/Output

Posted by Genseric on October 20th, 2014 under Coaching Session


In my last article I wrote about Mommy Professor’s first class citizenry.

To state the obvious again, there must be a second class of citizens if there is to be a first. The second class of citizens in “Diversity”-addled Western Utopia has obviously become Europids.

As in the case of any second-class citizenry (out-group) in all of history, they are treated as poorly as the “in-group” is allowed to treat them. This “allowance” is quantified by measuring and expressing the amount of resistance at any given time.

Politicians refer to socioeconomic and sociopolitical resistance as the Overton Window. Electrical Engineers and Physicists refer to and measure resistance in ohms. Regardless of the discipline, the symbol for resistance is Omega (Ω).

Allow me to expand on Omega for a moment, the Greeks have said Omega’s quantitative value is 800 even. Coincidentally, there are almost exactly 800 million Europids left on the planet.

Power, or POTENTIAL, is the amount of energy it takes to overcome a resistance. The formula (Ohm’s Law) for power is a natural law and it can ONLY be expressed WITH resistance. The greater the resistance, the greater the power potential. Somehow this fits with what we are doing.

Thank you for that. Now back to the basics.  photo 5be47e65-1115-47e5-bd00-d7ad959d0a72.jpg

Since the baby boomer generation of Whites still has numbers in America and Europe, anti-whites can only go so far. Otherwise, they risk violent revolution should they overreach (or overload the system).

Anti-white screamers can only go so far with anti-white policy and anti-white thugs can only go so far with anti-white violence. Again, otherwise they risk overloading the system.

Tinley Park’s version of ‘Whack-a-Mole’ taught us that hammer-wielding, anti-white terrorists cannot go whole-hog into a suburban restaurant with guns a-blazin’ – at least not yet. Otherwise, they risk…. You get the picture.

So, PCO’s and their thought police take anti-white violence and turn it into a “game.” And they take anti-white policy and give it “Diversity” and “Multiculturalism” and “Tolerance” window dressing.

To do otherwise would be to fail at Inclusivity (capital “i”).

“Diversity” gurus want to pull back the Overton Window. However, anyone with a partially-functioning cerebral cortex can clearly see what both are designed to do.

Both vehicles are shaped to facilitate and streamline hunting down and replacing whites with the third world in-group.

These anti-white tactics serve to marginalize the severity of the crime committed against white victims and minimize any legal or social consequences for the assailants.

These anti-white criminals absolutely lust over placing limits on pro-white resistance.

And that is why we are GIVEN pressure check-valves like “Sarah Palin’s Tea Party” and “The Populist Party.”

These quote anti-racists unquote and their Respectable Conservative enablers say they have descended from the heavens to sow the culturally-enriched seeds of “Diversity” and “Tolerance.”

What these anti-whites really plant for our children is White Genocide.

Diversity is a code word for White Genocide

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Bob on 10/20/2014 - 11:00 am

    This is essentially about the 35th comment on Untouchables One.
    You cannot imagine how great it is to find a BUGSER who can and will WRITE!
    A lot of BUGSERS asked me to comment on how to deal with White Priviledge, and others are trying to find a Mantra way of knocking down White Supremacist or Nazi.
    Like live theater, BUGS is about what works, not in theory, but out on the boards.
    So how about some versionof this, when somebody even MENTIONS any of those labels:
    “Even if I WERE a Nazi or White Supremacist or if there IS White Priviledge, how does that justify White Genocide?

    • #2 by Jason on 10/20/2014 - 6:08 pm

      I think that last line works. Nothing they say about ME, even if true, would justify White Genocide. Whenever we drift off into defending “what we are”, we are losing. We need a line that puts the focus BACK on White Genocide not on my beliefs or my haircut.

    • #3 by Benjamin Newells on 10/21/2014 - 2:43 am

      “Even if I WERE a Nazi or White Supremacist or if there IS White Priviledge, how does that justify White Genocide?”

      This is the sort of line some of us have been doing for quite some time already. I remember a few months ago we discussed how nearly everything anti-whites say is simply an attempted justification of White Genocide.

      You just have to point out “Does THAT justify White Genocide?”, “so you use X to justify White Genocide?”, and so on.

      It seems to take people months of swarming, maybe even years, to get their head around that these sorts of things like “White Privilege” are best dealt with with ONE simple line.

    • #4 by -Gar5- on 10/21/2014 - 3:59 am

      “You cannot imagine how great it is to find a BUGSER who can and will WRITE”

      Bob, check out http://whitegenocideproject.com/ – it’s a news site run by Bugsters.

      The first half of the article is the news, the second half talks about White genocide, for example:

      —–

      “This is just the same old “diversity” agenda that anti-Whites have been pushing for years now.

      First they flood a country with millions of non-White immigrants, then they say that White flight is bad, and then they chase down any White areas that try to escape from “diversity”.

      Anti-Whites are trying absolutely everything they can to get White people to mix with non-White people when many of us clearly don’t want to.

      This is White genocide because these conditions that have been put in place are intended to get rid of us.”

    • #5 by wretched Whiterabbit on 10/23/2014 - 6:40 pm

      Have you ever heard anyone talking about Black or Asian privilege in Black or Asian countries?
      You, “antiracists”, only combat this kind of “privilege” in White nations.
      Cos you aren’t really antiracist. You’re really just antiWhite.
      Antiracist is a code word for antiWhite.

  2. #6 by Mimmy Jarr on 10/20/2014 - 12:55 pm

    I can’t post on Swarms threads, so I’ll leave it here

    Comments are open at Raw Story:

    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/bagpipe-playing-oregon-racists-message-backfires-as-community-unites-against-hate/comments/

    • #7 by WmWhite on 10/22/2014 - 1:34 pm

      @Mimmy Jarr
      You put your “butt on the line” for your people and confronted what seemed to be a large organized group of anti-whites.

      My hats off to you sir.

  3. #8 by Jason on 10/20/2014 - 9:40 pm

    Anti-Whites got away with murder by acting like White Dominion was still in effect. They could reassure Whites of their majority status and say Whites had no reason to complain.

    Now that majority status is going away (already gone for kids under 5), they have to keep up the illusion of White Dominion. I think this “White Privilege” meme is their way of telling Bill O’Reilly types to relax, since you are still in charge, still have “privileges” and still need to keep PAYING for this unfair privilege.

    That MarriageEquality guy on PalTalk last week made it clear that Whites have MUCH to pay for due to the “unfair privileges” Whites had in the past.

    So, I think White Privilege will be the way they try to keep Whites off balance, since the White Majority status is obviously going away.

    • #9 by AnotherOne on 10/21/2014 - 8:40 pm

      “White Privilege” is an Anti-White conspiracy theory. There are no POLICIES that favor White people. There are “Diversity” POLICIES and “Affirmative Action” POLICIES that favor Non-whites. “White Privilege” is an Anti-White conspiracy theory.

      This line works and it’s starting to gain momentum. It was featured in the title of a Daily Stormer article, http://www.dailystormer.com/canada-tv-whites-argue-with-fat-paki-about-white-privilege-conspiracy-theory/

      • #10 by Secret Squirrel on 10/22/2014 - 1:25 am

        Works on whom? Its meant to strike fear into heart of the enemy. Calling it a conspiracy, does not do that. It is treating it like a joke.

        If the same were done to Jews, they would go on the offensive. They would call it racial defamation and libel. They would say that saying a racial group has unearned privilege, leads directly to genocide.

        The conspiracy meme will not be effective, because its a limp wristed non-attack. They are hitting the anti-Whites with a wet noodle.

        • #11 by Secret Squirrel on 10/22/2014 - 2:11 am

          First step to becoming a warrior, is learning the difference between a sword and a wet noodle.

      • #12 by Secret Squirrel on 10/22/2014 - 3:03 am

        Actually forget what I said. They did put anti-White in there and that is an attack. That’s a big step forward for our side.

        • #13 by Denounce Genocidists on 10/22/2014 - 12:17 pm

          “Actually forget what I said. They did put anti-White in there”

          Thanks for noticing.

          • #14 by Secret Squirrel on 10/22/2014 - 3:30 pm

            Conspiracy theory was the part I zeroed in on. I associate that with UFO/Who killed JFK types and the only thing they ever had to fear, was people making fun of them.

            So that’s why I think it’s AmRen weak. Anti-White gives it 50% strength at most.

            • #15 by AnotherOne on 10/22/2014 - 10:46 pm

              Try using it instead of thinking about it.

              • #16 by Secret Squirrel on 10/23/2014 - 4:29 am

                No need. I know a winner when I see it. That’s why I use Bob’s short swords, instead of AmRen’s wet noodles and this is a wet noodle.

                • #17 by Secret Squirrel on 10/23/2014 - 4:51 am

                  And besides that, it doesn’t return the discussion to White Genocide, so its a waste of time.

                  • #18 by Benjamin Newells on 10/23/2014 - 5:00 am

                    Secret Squirrel, I’m in agreement with you.

                    I’ve tested the anti-white conspiracy theory line before. My instinctual feeling is that it doesn’t put anti-whites into the state of fear that other lines do.

                  • #19 by AnotherOne on 10/23/2014 - 9:20 pm

                    The term ‘White Genocide’ is nowhere to be found in the Mantra. “anti-racist” is a code word for Anti-White doesn’t say anything about White Genocide either. Neither does “diversity” just means chasing down whites. “White Privilege” is an Anti-White conspiracy is a line that is used when Anti-Whites bring up the White Privilege conspiracy theory. Do you not understand that this is the term the anti-whites are pushing right now? This is the line to crush that term. If you’re too slow witted to understand how to write a sentence after it to get back to White Genocide than I really don’t know what to tell you.

                    • #20 by Benjamin Newells on 10/24/2014 - 12:01 am

                      Psychological warfare against the anti-whites revolves around keeping our opponents talking about White Genocide and their anti-white-ism. If you are not skillful enough to control the energy flow so the warfare is all about White Genocide and anti-white-ism, then you’re a failed swarmer.

                      P.s. “White Genocide” is short for: “…genocide against my race, the White race…”

                      Idiot.

  4. #21 by Jason on 10/21/2014 - 11:15 pm

    What do we do when Whites start demanding their own spokesmen, and former anti-Whites start trying to take over? I don’t mean Tim Wise types. I mean the danger from more “moderate” Bill O’Reilly types.

    • #22 by Jason on 10/21/2014 - 11:20 pm

      And the reason I don’t worry Tim Wise or some other open anti-White is because they will never have traction with Whites once Whites want their own leaders.

      But I am afraid of a Bill O’Reilly type, a neutral type, or even a Robert E Lee type who is too worried about looking respectable. They would lead us to disaster.

      • #23 by Denounce Genocidists on 10/22/2014 - 12:05 pm

        “But I am afraid of a Bill O’Reilly type, a neutral type, or even a Robert E Lee type who is too worried about looking respectable”

        We can all help out in destroying that respectability by not acting as if O`Reilly or any of those potential Traitors are anything more than disposable anti-white footstools.

        It`s easily done with the mantra and the anti-white/pro-white labelling don`t you agree?

  5. #24 by WmWhite on 10/22/2014 - 1:35 pm

    Genseric, a well written and thought provoking article.
    thank-you

    • #25 by Daniel Genseric on 10/23/2014 - 12:39 am

      BBG is the only one to actually make a comment about the main point of the article. And it was a great comment!

      Thanks BBG!

  6. #26 by Jason on 10/22/2014 - 11:55 pm

    By the way the graphic was great.

  7. #27 by Denounce Genocidists on 10/23/2014 - 6:27 am

    Alderman: You fellows are untouchable, is that the thing? No one can get to you? Hey, everyone can be gotten to.

  8. #28 by wretched Whiterabbit on 10/23/2014 - 5:43 pm

    When someone throws ANY label at me, I simply reply with,
    “Sure, any time a normal White person points out White geNOcide, antiWhites start trying to label us…”White Supremacist, Nazi, racist”.
    You’re just saying that because I’m White.
    Antiracist is a code word for antiWhite.
    It works. It’s consistent. Why change it?

    • #29 by wretched Whiterabbit on 10/23/2014 - 6:12 pm

      [sorry for the addendum but I can’t seem to edit my posts]
      In some instances, I prefer to phrase the above slightly differently, “Whenever I talk about White genocide, people start applying antiWhite labels to me; ‘…Nazi, racist’.” …

      This makes the conversation more personal, about me, delegitimizes all “antiWhite labels”, and *slightly* takes pressure off my antagonist. I find that a tactful approach can help to keep a contested dialog open at times, providing more opportunity for repetition of the critical words, “White genocide”, and “antiWhite”.

    • #30 by Benjamin Newells on 10/24/2014 - 12:14 am

      I use something similar to that but I use loaded questions which are more aggressive.

      “What aspect of opposing White Genocide and your anti-white-ism makes me ‘X’?”

      “so an ‘X’ is a White person who opposes White Genocide?”

      One criticism: Your response is too wordy. Why are you using the words “sure”, “any time”, “normal”, “start”, “trying”?

      “When White people point out White geNOcide, antiWhites label us ”White Supremacist, Nazi, racist”.

  9. #31 by wretched Whiterabbit on 10/23/2014 - 5:48 pm

    I’ve also been focusing on the fact that the White genocide agenda is aimed at CHILDREN.
    AntiWhites HATE that. For instance, the Cheerios ads that they all LOVE. It’s very obvious with children IN the ads. They are aiming at CHILDREN. White genocide pushed on kids. Wow.
    I’ve had several people delete and block me on Facebook for this. But, they don’t just delete ME and my comments. They delete their own posts and comments about the ads.
    In spite of all their good intentions, they KNOW that I’m pointing out a pernicious truth.

  10. #32 by ElectricWhiteRabbit on 10/24/2014 - 10:53 am

    Whenever an anti-White starts calling me names like “White supremacists, nazi…ect” I simply reply with…

    “X is just a HATE word that you ANTI-WHITES use to SCREAM at anyone who opposes WHITE GENOCIDE

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white
    Diversity is a code word for white genocide”

    Whenever I use it but never get responses after that.

You must be logged in to post a comment.