Once again, this is as obvious as MSNBC’s banner on the Arizona law, “Arizona Makes Illegal Immigration a Crime.” No one noticed that by definition, something illegal IS a crime.

So someone was stumped when they were pointing out white genocide and the traitor answered, “There are some things that are more important.”

Just as with illegal means a crime, this is tautological. All traitors have to say that something is more important than loyalty. But a Pro-Life race traitor will go to pieces if you say there is something more important than Life.

A Communist will go to pieces if you say there are some things more important than income redistribution.

A psychopath will rage if he is sentenced to be punished for hurting someone else. Ted Bundy was absolutely eloquent about how the world was persecuting him.

Someone with no sense of loyalty or gratitude whatsoever is called a sociopath. There is supposed to be a difference between a sociopath and a psychopath, who is without any empathy at all. The person who says “There is something more important” is making no sacrifice.

Anyone who can see a beautiful blond and a black man together is missing something in his makeup. It is sort of like the Victorian attitude toward sex, a man pretended to have no lust at all, but homosexuality was REALLY forbidden. So you were supposed to have the RIGHT lack of lust.

I believe that people who claim they have no such feelings are often telling the truth. They are sociopaths or, in many cases, those guys have no concern whatever about what a GIRL does.

Or they are just that far gone.

The problem with a traitor’s Something Special is that he has a few other Something Specials. He REALLY doesn’t care, and you can find that out in the most abrupt and critical places.

Society is a entirely a matter of prejudices. When a person can justify not caring, he loses those basic outlooks we count on to be a society. The World War II Veteran whose father would have resisted criminals says he is TRAINED, he KNOWS YOU Can’t Fight City Hall.

He is scared, so he suddenly believes in A Government of Law and Not of Men. Which phrase is as funny as that MSNBC banner nobody saw through. It is impossible for there to be a law which is not the opinion of men, not to be enforced by men.

The Greatest Generation is just saying that “We the People” is not Law . They want lawyers in dresses who have political influence enough to be appointed as judges to tell the people what to do.

As Trucker Roy says, everybody looks down on lawyers and everybody knows politicians are crooked. But combine the two and put on a dress and you have A Government of Laws and Not of Men.

Rule by lawyers in dresses is one of those things that is “something better” than loyalty or gut feelings.

A generation ago many colleges had General Knowledge Tests, conducted when students came in and in their last year. When the latter test was taken, the person had been literate for four more years of a 22-year lifetime, so the 22-year-olds had more general knowledge than they had when they entered.

This was used as proof that Education Pays. But someone who had been out working for four years would have had more knowledge of the world in general after four years, too.

No matter what a group of people do for four years, a major portion of their literate lifetime at that age, they will know more at 22 than they did at 18.

Well, almost.

There WAS one exception to the rule. Those who had gotten an Education degree had LESS general knowledge than they did as freshmen. This didn’t really surprise anybody or impress anybody, least of all those who RAN the Schools of Education.

As you are no doubt aware, to be a teacher you need lots of courses in Education and a very few courses in whatever it is you teach.

This is the degree Bill O’Reilly has. What he says is not the liberal line, but it does sound like a grammar school teacher. He repeats ALL the lines perfectly. He will say that nothing is a problem of intelligence, it is all a matter of Bad Upbringing.

All anybody needs is Education. Once O’Reilly said, “Are you going to say that some kids are just naturally SMARTER than others? That’s absurd.”

O’Reilly’s “wisdom” is so hackneyed it isn’t him who worries me, it is his audience. But he has had the top Cable Network program for years and he deserves it. When a moron is the smartest man in the room, you really need to take a look at that room.

O’Reilly has some consistency and he takes on silly people directly. He is consistent in his Old Fashioned, Family Values, Party-Line position.

O’Reilly is such an enemy of some silliness that people don’t even notice his own. But without his own, he wouldn’t be ALLOWED on television. He represents the Old nonsense, which is less mindless than the New nonsense.

If you look at the room he is in, he really is the smartest kid there.

O’Reilly also takes feedback. I don’t mean just that he GETS feedback, but he pays attention to it. I stopped watching him regularly after he had a special on how some Georgia high school students had DARED to have a PRIVATE high school prom to which blacks were not invited.

You have to understand respectables to see why he came on so strong on this. For a respectable, there is a Glory and a Free Set of Brownie Points with the media if you denounce any form of “white racism.” So he came on the same way he would have if some terrorists had done a mass shooting.

The next day you could tell he was stunned. He hasn’t done that since. The comedian Miller started out for a cheap shot at segregationists a few days back, and O’Reilly cut him off.

I remember Ally Mac Beal was getting ready to have the standard black boyfriend show and the grassroots protest stopped it before it got all the way.

But, as I say, O’Reilly actually READS a lot of his feedback.

When you spend your entire working life among people who say “racism” is worse than terrorism, you learn to ignore any comment from anyone YOU DEFINE as a racist. So this kind of reaction comes as a total shock,

I remember reading a story about a little kid who came home from his first day of school proud as punch. He told his mother that his class was divided into the smarter kids, Table A, the regular kids, Table B, and the Dumb Table.

He announced proudly, “I’m the smartest one at the Dumb Table!”

Well, I guess Bill does have SOMETHING to be proud of.

There has been one campaign after another to raise the driving age in every state. One showed a kid with a frown on his face staring at the camera, and the nice, fair poster said, “Do you want Him driving on where YOU do?”

I wouldn’t want ANYBODY with that expression of his NEAR me.

I mention this because it was the first time I had ever testified before a committee, and I was alone. I was barely sixteen so I could keep my license if they raised the age, but I KNEW something. I knew that, at the least with the statistics at that time, raising the age to 16 would do no good at all.

I knew that the 14 to 16-year olds had a lower accident per mile rate than most of the other two-year groups. I knew that in Europe, where you had to wait until you were twenty-one, the deaths per mile were triple the American rates.

What was really impressive about my speaking there was that it was a an omen for the rest of my life. First, I was the ONLY witness on the anti side. Second, the long line of witnesses for the trendy side were the same ones who line up for every single trendy cause today.

There must have been twenty guys with their collars backwards. If these guys believe their business is keeping people out of Hell, they would have SOMETHING to do besides marching about capital punishment and abortion. Most of them were Episcopalian so I doubt they really believed in anything but their social status.

But everybody but me had been there before, usually on some other Fashionable Issue of the Day.

They bitched and moaned about “young drivers.” But the statistics they were quoting were about the infamous 16-25-year-old male drivers. The law would do nothing to bring down THEIR accident rate.

I guess that was one of my earliest Mantras, trying to get off the moaning and screeching and talk about REALITY. But you would certainly have recognized the pro witnesses, and the lone person on the other side.

In covering the Arizona law allowing cops to check immigration status, MSNBC had a headline, “Arizona Law Declares Illegal Immigration a Crime.”

Brian sent it to me without comment. But he is aware that he could have sent it to no one else without comment.

A crime is defined as doing something illegal. You may steal two cents as a misdemeanor, but is still a crime. But most people can’t think that way. Try sneaking into Mexico and see if it’s not a crime.

But I don’t think ANYBODY else would see the joke. Even Truck Roy took an explanation to get it.

BASICS. I work on basic the way Euclid worked on his logic. I don’t settle for “coming up with” an argument that wins a debate. I work at it and work at it and USE it until I can make the person I am talking to see how RIDICULOUS he is. He is not wrong on a POINT, he is doing pathological thinking.

You can hear Truck’s interview with me when he announces it. But I need HEIRS, people who THINK like me. I can’t afford to just laugh when some woman in a salon where I waited for my wife said, in the middle of her $500 hair job, “Looks don’t matter.”

It is a standard line, “looks don’t matter.” So standard that even in a salon no one sees it as funny.

And for me, the humor is running out. I got to get to my freezer or wherever the Lord puts me and I don’t want to leave behind a world of NOTHING BUT Pod People.

It would be nice to have others who can get the joke at the first line. It took me DECADES to develop this, so “I‘m just not smart like Bob” is NOT an excuse. I could have been understood, if not agreed with, by almost every literate American before WWII.

All crimes are illegal, gang!

Traitors are not hypocrites, gang. No one is more sincere than a traitor. He thinks that Jesus was Wise because Jesus told people to hurt themselves. Today’s race sincere is as sincere as the Trappist who treated himself the way no one would treat the lowest slave in the name “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

If a Medieval Trappist monk did unto another the way he did unto himself the other wouldn’t live a week.

Today’s treason morality is not radical. A person today who is Catholic immediately says something bad about Catholics, a Protestant talks down Protestant, and above all, a white wants his kind off the face of the earth.

This is not radicalism. This is the Medieval Trappism that the Trappists have now rejected.

If you make the other person see himself that way you can help them and us. But repeating “arguments” is a dead end.

Don’t expect to win. INTRODUCE them to THINKING.

The Mantra has taken so long to sink in that I have little time left to get people doing the thinking, sort of like Newton not being able to get around to gravity.

A lot of other people could have understood me before the Great Slave Generation came along. But THINKING, real thinking, is always rare.

Profiling is an integral part of law enforcement. A profiler is paid to notice trends.

A border IS discrimination in exactly the same way that criminal profiling is discrimination.

Colonialism means that you presume to speak for other people’s welfare.

You cannot be rational about criminal profiling and avoid race.

You cannot be rational about a border and avoid race.

The only way any government can avoid colonialism is by presuming to speak ONLY for its OWN people’s interests. The best example of this is in the Preamble to real US Constitution, which said the Constitution was set up by us, and for ourselves and OUR posterity.

If you proposed the preamble to the US Constitution in any European country, you would be violating the law.

In Europe the US Bill of Rights is considered as subversive as Hitler and Stalin considered it.

The whole question of immigration, for example, is nonsense if you talk about nondiscrimination.

If you are going to set an imaginary line around an area, the area has to have some reality. But the very idea of a “border” is nonsense if everybody in it insists that They Are the World.

The American media did not call it a Soviet Empire, because Empire meant an area was held for some one else’s benefit. The Soviets held onto Eastern Europe for Idealism, for The People’s benefit, and for Self Defense.

Freedom is discrimination. It means you do not have to justify what you want.. Freedom simply means that you can claim something because YOU want it. All the things we call dictatorship or tyranny simply mean that someone else decides what you will have because they know better than your prejudices do.

Is there a pattern to what I have been writing? No, it simply goes round and round, showing that everything that is Holy today, nondiscrimination, a Government of Laws and not of Men, Freedom, are all perfect self-contradictions.

The Old Church persecuted Galileo and Copernicus with Doctrine. Nothing has changed at all.

Wordism keeps talking about all these Great Ideals, Freedom and Nondiscrimination, and each Wordism finds its own niche and makes a living for a lot of people. As these groups and their bureaucracies gain and lose power, Freedom begins to win for while, then Nondiscrimination gains a foothold.

You call it Republicans and Democrats. The Nothing but Freedom and then Nothing but We are the World. It is ball game, a tennis match. The public sits there and its heads move all together, left and right, three hundred million of them.

Tennis fans never watch themselves. But when you watch them they look ridiculous.

I have been watching voters a long, long time.

They look ridiculous.

Most of what I write consists of “Cut the crap.”

It is now once again official doctrine that race is a myth. It was doctrine that the world was created in six days. Everybody knows that blacks and Hispanics will NEVER get smart people’s jobs without affirmative action.

Nobody would bet anything on this nonsense.

I gave you the example of 83% of my congressman’s district favoring shooting looters.

By the way, it was NOT a conservative district. The Republican Ohio state legislature tried three times to get rid of John by gerrymandering Democrats into his district. An area that had been overwhelmingly Democratic gave John 73 % of the vote in his last election in 1980.

The Ohio legislature was moderate Republican. As I pointed out before, when Bush, Sr. took office he got rid of EVERY SINGLE ONE of the thousands of Reagan appointees. They wanted to get rid of John far more than they wanted to unseat ANY Democrat in congress.

One friend of mine described the Republican Conventions: “Every four years, conservatives go to the convention, get kicked in the teeth and come up smiling.”

When someone asked Nelson Rockefeller if the Eastern Establishment of the Party was solidly behind him, he replied, “I AM the Eastern Republican Establishment.” He was under no illusion about how just how many of these “middle of the roaders” and liberals would EVER identify with the GOP.

But for decades conservatives didn’t get it. They still don’t.

If you will actually LOOK at the voting records of people who get ELECTED to congress, almost none of them are ever in the middle of the road. People normally vote for the incumbent. They have to have a real incentive not to follow this routine.

Everybody knows how heavily voters favor the incumbents. Yet they keep insisting that the only way to get RID of an incumbent is to offer somebody who sounds just like him! That was the strategy that kept the Republicans in the minority in both Houses of Congress for a record forty years, 1955-1995.

But they still say, “The votes are in the middle of the road.” One quick look at the ADA and ACA voting records of congressmen at any time during that forty-year period would show that was nonsense.

But no professional commentator on either side would DARE do that.

Most of what I say is Cut the Crap because most of what we live by is not only untrue, everybody KNOWS it’s not true. But they repeat it as truth.

Today a person who has a brain between his ears and a mouth is considered dangerous.

Moderates stayed in charge of one of the two major parties for generations without any support at all. It was weird watching conservatives trying desperately to compromise with a group of politicians who represented voters who did not exist.

It was Boogey Man stuff. Conservatives would talk at length about “them,” meaning all those millions of “middle-of-the-road” voters in the polls. They ran to compromise with any politician who claimed to represent these mysterious people.

It reminded me of a game where people throw shadows up on a blank screen with their hands. At every Republicans get-together there was the party base and the Ghost.

When we were trying to get the Republicans to appeal to what the media then called “Wallace voters” and later referred to very respectfully as “Reagan Democrats,” I could feel this Ghost. We had a proven ten million and more voters to go after.

They had a myth, the myth Republicanism had been chasing for losing decade after losing decade.

I can tell you from experience that it harder to argue against a myth than it is to debate facts. With facts you have somewhere to START. With facts the other side is not actually delusional.