I have explained the OWS phenomenon. This is not overkill if you see the REASON.
Respectable conservatives get paid to take the leftists seriously. Every issue of National Review, as I expected, has an article with a big name on it that says, no, we’re not FOR Occupy Wall Street, but they have a point.
Please note: This is why I keep repeating they do NOT have a point. That is why I criticized commenters for SAYING they have a point. The establishment pays hundreds of millions of dollars for thousands of respectable conservative to be just the RIGHT opposition
It embarrasses the hell out of me when a BUGSER even touches on that territory.
No, they do NOT have a point. For at least the fourth time, let me repeat that they command titanic resources which were mobilized over the years for giant causes which all won and which all failed miserably.
Please LISTEN to the Coach on this: it is not just that gun control, world government through global warming, British socialism, the Soviet Empire failed. The difference between a BUGSER and a lickspittle respectable conservative is never deviating from WHY they failed.
They were NOT intellectually incorrect. They were SILLY.
OWS is ridiculous. The idea that an economy can be run directly by professors and bureaucrats is SILLY.
Unless you want to look like William Buckley, STOP THERE.
#1 by backbaygrouch on 11/24/2011 - 7:36 am
What does “having a point’ mean? The political process in broad terms works as follows: a problem is recognized; an analysis is made; a solution is proposed. If by having a point you mean all three steps, OWS is a dud. It does not work with steps two or three. But if all that is meant is step one, then OWS has a point.
Example, the financial markets have been allowed to run amok. Laws against fraud have been repealed or neutered. There are a lot of mega-rich thieves not being prosecuted. As far as this goes OWS has a point. However, they do not seem to have the ability and have not made an effort to understand why this is so. Their solutions range from vague to nonexistent though the pedigree indicates communism. In short they do not have a point.
It is a semantic issue whether a statement of a putative fact is having a point. Words can have multiple meanings. Ask Bill Clinton about ‘is,’
Beyond that OWS is political Dadaism. It is pointless and meant to be. The Occidental Observer has just posted a four part study on the Jewish agenda in Dada so-called art. It is kind of heavy going though in the final half of Part four it gets tied together. It is relevant to understanding the anarchic theater being played out on the evening news to the detriment of a lot that is much more important.
There are eight million stories in the city. Why is OWS the one to make the news night after night? The immediate goal is the deconstruction of White society. The ultimate goal to promote White Genocide.
Side note. The great discovery of OWS of the ‘human microphone,’ having a leader shout something and the mob repeating it is nothing new. Ask a Baptist about lining out hymns. It goes back at least four hundred years in various English Christian congregations. It is an a capella mode of singing favored especially in churches without an organ.
#2 by Epiphany on 11/24/2011 - 8:33 am
The OWS demonstrations are just silly, like everything about Political Correctness!
#3 by Epiphany on 11/24/2011 - 8:35 am
Political Correctness has always been about destroying the English Langauge, taking words our and replacing a few of them with Euphemisms. It really is a religion!
#4 by Epiphany on 11/24/2011 - 8:40 am
The Whole Point of the Mainstream Media is to vilify certain types of Whites, namely White Southerners and Germans, in order that most of the other Whites turn against them. And they do. In this way, they divide the White Race against each other!
They almost never make movies or television shows vilifying Blacks or American Indians anymore. No, for that would UNITE Whites!
#5 by Genseric on 11/24/2011 - 10:09 am
“And they do. In this way, they divide the White Race against each other!”
And now it is happening again with Russia, maybe.
Perhaps Bob’s letter to Medvedev was read.
We shall see.
#6 by Simmons on 11/24/2011 - 10:28 am
I’m with Bob, this is the monied left gasping at straws via a few of the cults, mainly the white guilt one.
I can’t say that I care, since this is basically the radical left protesting the mainstream left in an attempt to hornswaggle the Bob Dole Right into something or another. Same shit different day.
Please god let these OWS fools burn down the houses of their fellow leftists, make my day.
#7 by Simmons on 11/24/2011 - 10:56 am
What is important is that BUGs has destroyed the old order, these kids and cults run on the fumes of a trust fund.
Our best could meet any world leader anytime and be the dominate person in the room.
Not to quibble the details or expound on future plans but to unleash the promise of our race.
#8 by Gavin on 11/24/2011 - 3:30 pm
That is very optimistic but I don’t see any “old order” destroyed, they are still there. I also don’t see us meeting with any “world leader.” Perhaps you see things I don’t but from my vantage point, we don’t exactly have this thing in the bag.
#9 by Simmons on 11/25/2011 - 1:26 am
Looking back by 1942 the Germans and Japanese were toast even thought the masses might have thought otherwise.
As Bob has said wars are decided long before the slaves in uniform show up to kill each other.
On another forum a professional “die juder” namer is ripping me for daring say the jews are toast. Most likely if they really are she is out of a vocation. Point being all the people stuck on fail will stay on fail, Bugsers will not.
I should have said “if we met a world leader.” sorry
#10 by Gavin on 11/25/2011 - 2:02 am
I can see how things are long term and can be “over” before most people even believe they have started but I just can’t see our path to victory as being complete and the “old order” as being done in by BUGS already.
I do see that some things are moving our way but I don’t exactly see what you (and some other pro-whites I respect) are claiming. I really do wish that I had the insight to be able to see all these things and it bugs me that I can’t.
I look at all the things our enemy has done and I am astounded at how brilliant some of it is and how well it has all seemed to work and I want to be able to make these kinds of plans as well.
#11 by Alan B on 11/24/2011 - 11:57 pm
Real leadership in control of the 3 branches of government could destroy the left and respectables conservatives by defunding every leftist program and institution funded with tax payers money, it is that simple and constitutionally legal.
#12 by Fourmyle on 11/25/2011 - 2:14 am
THEIR GOAL IS GENOCIDE. OURS. WHAT’S YOURS?
The same forces, the same people with the same mindset, placed Obama in the White House, where he has, by Executive Order unquestioned by the nominal Opposition Party, firmed up Affirmative Action to the point that White Males are not eligible for government jobs, and passed the DREAM Act, de facto, which, in time, will reduce the Republican Party to a mere Southern rump, the party of Charlie Brown and the snake handlers.
OWS is simply part of the OCCUPY! Movement, which has plans that go well beyond the facades presented in Zuccotti Park. These people are networking up fast, and use the 2012 Elections as a permanent sealing of their System of governance. Obama is merely a figurehead, a useful tool.
OCCUPY! won the fight in Ohio, and it will win a lot more over the years to come, because the public employee unions are now fighting for their life, as well as their fringe benefits and their pensions.
OWS led a movement that took 4.5 billion dollars – that’s four and a half BILLION dollars out of business banks, and moved them into credit unions.
ONE PERCENT of that will fund an awful lot of “independent” political activism. Considering the return on investment – job security, for one – this should not be too hard a deal for the Leaders to propose.
I’m sorry – this is the sort of practical politics that works, if only for the people who can only agree on their job security, fringe benefits, pensions, and hatred for White Men in general – unless they are union reps for the firefighters, the police, and the teachers.
Don’t forget, if you need reasons why they are effective, I can give you FOUR AND A HALF BILLION of them, for openers. At a ten percent reserve requirement, that’s forty-five billions dollars in loans they could create.
That is the tip of the iceberg.