Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Things I Hope Anti-Whites are Right About

Posted by Bob on October 6th, 2012 under Coaching Session

Civil rights policy officially in the United States is as Bill O’Reilly said it, “There is no place in America for an all-white community.” American armed forces are ready to enforce that, just as American soldiers are ready to fight and die for the proposition that, “There is no place in Europe for a country that is ethnically pure.”

If one is allowed the whole house of cards will go down.

I didn’t say that. Anti-whites say that all the time.Photobucket

They also say that “Hate is not free speech.” Which is why I have repeated at least twenty times here, with no one taking the next step, that the Soviet Constitution of 1936, written under Stalin, has more guarantees of freedom in it than any document before or since. It included the right of Soviet Republics to secede, which suddenly came in handy about 1990.

AS I have said again and again and again and again and again, it was just understood under Stalin that the guaranteed freedom of speech did NOT include the freedom to say things one should not say. This should leap into mind as soon as one sees the new slogan, “Hate is not Free Speech.”

The only difference between the first amendment and the Soviet Constitution is that the latter is understood to say, “Heresy is not free speech.”

That tiny bit of open systems thinking is the difference between America and Stalin.

Anti-whites insist that the instant you open the door to pro-white heresy, to anything they choose to call Hate, the whole anti-white program is doomed.

In cases like these we have to avoid simply reacting to them and going back to the basic point.

Will the whole civil rights/anti-white program be undermined if our ideas get general circulation?

BUGS is dedicated to the proposition that that is exactly what WILL happen.

To us, the anti-whites look all powerful. They at least say they are on very, very thin ice.

In this case, I’m rooting for THEM.

Share it now. Like it while you're at it.
  1. #1 by Feu denfer on 10/06/2012 - 6:53 am

    Anti whites are now actually demonstrating publicly FOR genocide:

  2. #2 by Feu denfer on 10/06/2012 - 6:56 am

    Anti whites are now publicly demonstrating FOR genocide, they’re not even bothering with the code words:

  3. #3 by Jason on 10/06/2012 - 7:03 am

    We don’t like thinking of ourselves as victims. At the heart of most failed pro-White activism, is an inability to feel and act properly aggrieved, in my opinion. I brought it up before and someone said it sounded whiny (I may have said that too).

    But the more I think of it, we ARE victims. How can you tell the world you are targeted for genocide, and yet say you don’t want to appear as a victim?

    This is some kind of false pride. If your people are victims of genocide then you ARE a victim.

    As victims of genocide, we should have intense outrage. But it should come from a place of righteousness, a deeply moral feeling. I honestly don’t think most of us, including most pro-Whites, have really internalized it.

    We don’t strike back with the right responses because we haven’t really framed it properly in our own mind. I am sure many of you have, but all over the internet, I find very few pro-Whites, even Mantra Whites, who ACT like they are victims of genocide.

    If we awaken that spark, THAT will destroy the Anti-White system.

    I’d be happy to hear why would SHOULDN’T view ourselves as victims.

    • #4 by Harumphty Dumpty on 10/07/2012 - 2:19 am

      What an excellent comment. Jason, I get a lot out of your comments here, and this one inspired me to write a meditation exercise. It’s one that I’ve found myself doing for some time now without ever having consciously intended to, and it’s certainly making me feel the reality that we’re being genocided.

      I changed it into a letter to Jared Taylor, and posted it in this form on Amren:

      (I sent this to Jared, but I originally wrote it as a meditation exercise for all whites)


      Dear Mr. Taylor,

      Please picture in your mind your country, or your city, or your neighborhood, or whatever area is dear to you, and then picture in your mind floods of brown folk pouring across the borders into that area you’re picturing.

      Then please also picture in your mind the increasing number of mixed couples you see daily in that area that have brown children, and picture that every single year from now on you will notice more and more of those mixed couples and more of their brown children.

      Please picture the schoolyards you’ve seen in your area that have a remarkably larger number of brown children than the adult population in your area has brown adults.

      Picture those schoolyards becoming even more numerously filled with brown children as time moves on, and the flood of brown families that’s being permitted and encouraged to cross over the borders into your area never ceasing, and the number of mixed families with brown children you see growing each year to a larger number.

      See that brownness growing until there is no more whiteness.

      And then please ask yourself if at Towson University you spoke about what was most important, the relentless flooding of our countries with non-whites and the relentless forced integration of ourselves with those non-whites so as to assimilate us and blend us out of existence.

      If this genocide that is being carried out against whites is permitted to succeed, all the other concerns that you spoke of will be moot.

      I’ve thought all day and tried to understand, but I do NOT understand why you never once used the word “genocide” to describe what is being done to whites.

      And I do not understand how you were able to describe with such wonderful articulateness for an hour and a half the many injuries that are being done to whites, and never once even use the term to describe those injuries that is our best soldier on the ground today, “anti-white.”

      I’m honestly flummoxed by both of these things.

      (name withheld except on copy sent personally to Mr. Taylor via Amren)

      Praise was running so high for Jared on Amren and even on SF that I appended this honest (I think) note:

      Since it’s not evident in the letter above (I originally wrote it as a meditation for readers and posters here and not for Jared, and thus its tone), I want to repeat what’s obvious in a couple of my comments already: I have a large respect for Jared Taylor, and I think that his speech was marvelous within the limits he placed on it, and I think that his speech was a very positive event that should move us forward!

      But I also insist on my right to be greedy, since we don’t have forever to stop what’s being done to us.

      • #5 by John Locke on 10/07/2012 - 11:20 am

        Your efforts to get people to use effective mantra terms are much appreciated. Nice.

        • #6 by Harumphty Dumpty on 10/08/2012 - 9:29 pm


      • #7 by Harumphty Dumpty on 10/08/2012 - 9:28 pm

        I guess it wouldn’t be right to copy Jared’s reply to me here, but it seems fair to report on it.

        He believes that since most people think genocide involves actual killing, the term would seem bizarre to most people if applied to whites.

        His reply makes me suspect that he hasn’t much idea of what we’re up to here, and that he may also be just barely even aware of us. Anyway, I replied to him as below. None of my posts have been removed from that Amren Towson thread Friday that has the video on it.

        Dear Mr. Taylor,

        I wish I could remember how the bizarre word “racist” (racial feelings are a learned pathology rather than an innate human trait that evolved to protect the survival of human groups?) sounded to me when I first heard it. Remembering myself as a teenager in the 1950s, I think the word would have struck me then as an extravagant concoction.

        But just as with “racist,” once the term “white genocide” has been heard several thousand times by every white in the country, not only will it not seem bizarre, it will seem self-evident!

        But thanks for your honest response, and I’m also told that you DID use the term anti-white once in your speech…I hope it slipped into some white minds unnoticed!

        Those of us from BUGS who post in the mainstream hammer and hammer the term “anti-white” so it will chase the term “racist” out of white minds and will occupy those minds in its stead! We hammer the terms “white genocide” and “anti-white” so that those terms will become a reflexive part of white thinking and will do the same work for us that the R-word and its extended family have done for anti-whites!

        At 2:15–3:23 and 5:06–5:40, less than two minutes altogether, Don Black shows in this CBS interview about the Sikh temple shooting how “genocide” can be introduced in a reasonable way:

        Of course anti-whites have arguments that they present to all aspects of such BUGS material on genocide, but at BUGS I think we’ve already done very well in working out replies to every objection we’ve seen so far!


        • #8 by Harumphty Dumpty on 10/08/2012 - 11:46 pm

          Ah, Jared has replied in a bit more detail to my last reply, and I’m composing a reply back to him. I’m hoping that he and I can have a fruitful conversation. After it’s done, I’ll ask him how much of it he’s comfortable with my reporting here.

  4. #9 by POLARBEAR87j on 10/06/2012 - 8:07 am

    the soviets said they had a workers paradise…so why did they have to keep people in by walls and barbwire?
    our goverments say dieversity is great…so why make laws against people who dont agree?

    the u.s had ronald reagan
    and we’ve got Bob Whitaker and the mantra!

  5. #10 by Dick_Whitman on 10/06/2012 - 10:13 am

    “To us, the anti-whites look all powerful. They at least say they are on very, very thin ice.” (Bob)

    It took me years to realize this. If they weren’t on thin ice, they wouldn’t care if a few all White communities existed. But even the mention of such communities causes the anti-Whites to have fits. These are not people who are confident in their position.

    The anti-Whites have control of every information disseminating entity (education, radio, TV, public arts) except for the internet. But they still can’t rest easy at night knowing that people are semi-openly dissenting to the anti-White system on the internet.

    These are not people acting like people act who have a strong position. These are people (despite owning every information disseminating entity except for a small part of the internet)who know that their position is weak.

    Of course if you tell this to the average White Nationalist he will vigorously remind you of the great power of the mighty Juden and explain to you which Jew is in control of which information disseminating entity. After a tutorial on the Jewish role in the Bolshevik revolution, he will then reveal to you the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion and end by lamenting that fact “all hope is lost!”

    Most White Nationalists are hard core Jewish Supremacists.The biggest White Supremacists are non-whites.

    • #11 by Epiphany on 10/06/2012 - 12:51 pm

      That much is true. The White Nationalists are too obsessed with Jews. This, ironically enough, may have come from Christianity.

      Well, the odd thing is that there are more and more BLACK anti–Jews coming out of the woodwork now. I wonder what it could mean?

    • #12 by Jason on 10/06/2012 - 5:15 pm

      Whitman said:

      “Most White Nationalists are hard core Jewish Supremacists.The biggest White Supremacists are non-whites.”

      Very funny and very true. Many WNs see Jews as almost supernatural creatures, capable of planning events centuries in advance. If you try to talk reason to them, they make the most hilarious accusations. I very much resent all the time I spent engaging with them. It’s as if being pro-White is just an aside for them that they are ready to jettison at a moment’s notice.

      When Bob said David Duke wouldn’t go pro-White because his numbers dropped off, that said it all. We need a new start. The other hilarious thing I’ve noticed is that WNs, especially of the NS variety, can’t get along. One thread on TOO had 750 comments that was purely an argument between Nazis about holocaust education! Not one of them will post the Mantra. These are not serious people.

      It also proves Bob’s point about Wordism. Basically, all those Nazis have variations on their sacred creed, and so they despise each other. The 23 actual National Socialists in North America have created 23 warring schools of thought.

      • #13 by Harumphty Dumpty on 10/07/2012 - 11:02 pm

        Those NS posters would be unhappy under an actual NS government since they would be required to do something useful.

  6. #14 by steadiness on 10/06/2012 - 12:20 pm

    Another insightful article.

    Here’s the relevant part of the Soviet constitution (1936).

    Article 50. In accordance with the interests of the people and in order to strengthen and develop the socialist system, citizens of the USSR are guaranteed freedom of speech, of the press, and of assembly, meetings, street processions and demonstrations.

    Quoting the Soviet constitution at people who talk about restricting speech sounds great.

    Though, the last time a self-described Communist friend of mine started reciting anti-free-speech talking points, I replied that free speech isn’t needed to say popular things, which ended that (which I also learned to say here).

    The other response I have canned for when they talk about hate speech is not free speech is

    “[W]e want to convey the sense that the bigots are isolated, embittered individuals, rather than permit them to contact and coordinate with one another.” — Professor Jeremy Waldron, NYU Law, “The Harm in Hate Speech”, Harvard University Press, 2012

    • #15 by Daniel Genseric on 10/06/2012 - 12:29 pm

      “[W]e want to convey the sense that the bigots are isolated, embittered individuals, rather than permit them to contact and coordinate with one another.” — Professor Jeremy Waldron, NYU Law, “The Harm in Hate Speech”, Harvard University Press, 2012

      This is the VERY DEFINITION of bigotry.

      • #16 by Gavin on 10/06/2012 - 12:58 pm

        In the anti-White mind “bigotry” just means anything they don’t like.

        • #17 by Epiphany on 10/06/2012 - 1:13 pm

          Notice, the anti–Whites are curiously silent about Soviet and Chinese Communist Imperialism. No, they mostly go on about AMERICAN Imperialism! They leave much of what happened in The Cold War, out of their books.

      • #18 by Conrad on 10/06/2012 - 6:04 pm

        It could also be considered OPPRESSION.

  7. #19 by markwn on 10/06/2012 - 12:23 pm

    Hi folks, new to this so thought I would add this as my first post…might come in handing when doing battle.

    Here is a surprising quote made in 1999 by General Wesley Clark, then in command of U.S. troops in Serbia and a -Democratic presidential candidate-, to CNN:

    “There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That is a 19th-century idea, and we are trying to transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states.”

    Regarding that idiot Oreilly, he also had a multi-episode hissy fit about an all-White prom, yet remained quiet about all the “black” and “hispanic” clubs on college campuses.

    Oreilly has also been strangely quite about all the “black” associations in the workforce too.

    Oh, this double standard is such a weapon for us to wake up the masses.

    • #20 by Jason on 10/06/2012 - 5:21 pm

      Welcome aboard! May I ask how you got here?

  8. #21 by Jmcaul on 10/06/2012 - 1:36 pm

    Why when I speak of loving MY race, am I called a ‘hater?’
    Why is it called ‘HATE’ speech when I talk of LOVING my own people?
    Why if even ONE all-white area is allowed, there will be NO assimilation ANYWHERE?
    Why can’t there be ‘diversity’ of REGIONS in terms of who lives there?
    Why is the rainbow used to signify ‘multi-culturalism’ when EVERONE knows that without separation of the colors (BOUNDARIES between colors) the rainbow turns to mud? (actually, you don’t see them using the rainbow so much as their symbol anymore, I think they realized the rainbow actually argues AGAINST assimilation and quietly pulled it before too many people caught on…too late.)
    Perhaps they really do NOT want ‘diversity.’ Perhaps what they REALLY want is complete UNIFORMITY.

  9. #22 by shari on 10/06/2012 - 3:13 pm

    What” goes around comes around.” Anti-whites, especially those at the top, are trying, not only to stop free speech, they must control every single thing. Medicine, law, economics,communication, even thought itself. It’s way over reach, I think.
    I think and I hope that every evil plotted and done to white people,white children, comes back down on their own heads. At least those who were deliberate in their murderous attempts and not brainwashed. Thank God, we have Stalin, the Soviet Union, to look back on.
    There is hope that the worst is behind us, borne by others. Not only does the future belong to us, but this last battle as well. I pray that you bugsers get stronger and stronger.

    • #23 by Epiphany on 10/07/2012 - 7:43 pm

      What we need to do is harp on what Stalin did to us! That way, the other side of the History of the Second World War will be known.

  10. #24 by Juri on 10/06/2012 - 3:27 pm

    “”…Will the whole civil rights/anti-white program be undermined if our ideas get general circulation?..””

    Sure but white people must reject so called vulgar marxism or namecalling entirely. Getting rid from one mighty word results only that smart liberal academics invent the next one.

    In Eastern Europe we suceeded. There a two important things. First it is necessary to delegitimize those magic words. Example

    Leftist: Are you homophobe?
    My : What..maybe Im am witch or heretic or evil spirit also…do we will discuss about agricultural problems with somebody ranting about kulaks, class enemys and backward reactionary,s.Its ridiculous. We are not in witch trial or stalinist cangaroo court anymore so could you leftist keep your opinion honest.

    And the second thing is understanding that propaganda is monologue not dialogue. Don,t let yourself derailed and keep talking.

    Me: Every fifth pederast get HIV in first 10 years and this makes pederasty most dangerous activity in our times No othed work or hobby causes 20% paticipants incurable disability in 10 years.

    Left: You narrowminded hatefilled hatemonger
    Me repeated first point

    Leftist: You are liar, get yourself life and eduvate your peanut sized brain.
    Me : repeated first point

    And so on. Final outcome probaly all heared. Pussy Riot in church and now in jail. Ukraine outlawed pederast propagnda in public, Also some local activites, changing Hungarian constitution to make pederast marriage impossible and Lithuan law what also cancelled pro pederasty actions in puclik.

    Vulgar marxism means that enemy is runned out from any reasonable arguments and using only insults and the magic words. Also I suggest every pro white proaganda activist to be familiar with Reid technique.. Police uses it and it works.

    And of course is to get whole picture how leht thinks and works. We got this experience inUSSR but western people seems pretty harmful because nobody ever told tehem how to deal with psyhopats. Psyhopats they are. Without mental disese nobody becomes cultural maxist or any left winger at all.

    So success for one mantra gives only time to work next and more sopfisticated fighting tactics. And great thanks for previous mantra. I trolled down one Eastern Europe antifa website almost alone wiht your mantra.

  11. #25 by Conrad on 10/06/2012 - 6:15 pm

    A few thoughts.
    “…and in order to strengthen and develop the socialist system, …”
    Note the condition of free speech given here.

    So the pro-white-genocide crew is on thin ice? If I could just find a hammer & combine it with the Mantra, oh here it is, my copy of “JACKS WAR”.
    See, www. jackswar. com

  12. #26 by Feu denfer on 10/07/2012 - 10:32 am

    Maybe we could expand our terminology on these areas, such as

    “Paper freedoms” or “On-paper freedom”
    “Freedom of popular speech”

  13. #27 by John White on 10/07/2012 - 7:06 pm

    This might be a bit off-topic, but Mantra Thinking has help me design this brief piece which I have just posted on SF, in the section that discusses a very popular historic period about which Those That Shall Not Be Named want nobody else to talk about but them or their white servants:

    —- The Flat Earth Society states that the Earth is actually flat and not round.

    They openly say that NASA and all other space agencies are a gigantic conspiracy to fake space travel and make a profitable business with it.

    As far as I know, none of the “Earth Round Deniers” have been put behind bars. They are simply ignored.

    Imagine for a moment, however, that “Earth Round Denying” was considered a crime, that all “Flat Earthers” were demonized as “anti-Roundist” and their books banned because of “incitement to hatred towards the space industry community”.

    Wouldn’t you find THAT a little bit suspicious? —-

  14. #28 by Truck Roy on 10/08/2012 - 1:10 pm

    Well said, Bob!

    All it takes to break a big lie is a simple truth repeated over and over again.

    Not allowing an all White community anywhere is genocide. Not allowing an all White community anywhere is genocide. Not allowing an all White community anywhere is genocide.

  15. #29 by Cleric Preston on 10/09/2012 - 4:02 am

    Feu Denfer,
    ‘Freedom of Anti-White speech’ seems to work in my mind, and it still keeps the conversation in the realm of Anti-Whites and Genocide.
    ‘Freedoms for Anti-Whites’ (?) might work as well

Comments are closed.