Our entire concept of war comes from the group that calls itself The Greatest Generation. They were tossed into a conflict smarter people had long since predetermined, and as kids they didn’t actually get caught running away when the guns went off. That is, the third of them who ever HEARD a hostile shot fired.
They have therefore spent sixty yeras marveling at their own bravery. Theya re in love with themselves to an extent that one can honestly say that a whole generation of Americans has spent sixty years in masturbation mode. And THAT, boys and girls, is where we get the idea of what WAR is. So it seemed odd that I said below that whites lose large numbers to miscengenation, as happens in any all-out war.
Clauseewitz said that diplomacy was war by other means. He was a military man, so he looked at shooting war as the basic. Actually World War II was decided by people in coats and ties long before the first Greatest Generation type ever put on the costume he touches himself over. By the time he got to the point he worships, the WAR was already decided.
WAR is the life-and-death struggle. It doesn’t matter HOW you are destroyed. The fact that blacks feel their inferiority to an incurable extent is seen in how they demand black guys get blond girls. That is their bottom-line demand. That is the Jews’ bottom-line demand. That is what integration was all about. WAR has nothing to do with costumes or gunfire. Even in the case of the costumes and rifles, war is seldom a matter of racial survival, in any sense of that term.
Get off the gunfire crap. Forget the Masturbation Generation. We are in a far more serious war than any of those that were declared throughout history.
#1 by Dave on 02/09/2007 - 3:24 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
The essence of Alan’s comment about the harshness of the Southern environment producing a culture of kinship is basic to understanding the arithmetic of the whole of white social life and history.
For more than thirty-five years only lone and solitary white gentile voices have been willing to take on the Jews in Congress. This has enabled the Jews to pick off the rebels one by one.
By why?
Dissenters in Congress if only a small handful could successfully challenge the Jewish lobby if they stood together. Even a small band of dissenters, determined to stand together, would have created an insurmountable problem for the Jewish lobby.
But the fact is right up to and including today, the white gentiles in Congress, all of who know the truth of Jewish misbehavior and wrongdoing in American foreign and domestic policy, DO NOT WANT TO MAKE A STAND.
Yet it is only BW among us that says OPENLY such a stand is inevitable.
Quite clearly BW is right. Accordingly, BW is a genuine prophet of political arithmetic.
The battle against the Jews has already been determined. But the larger battle looms, and this is the battle that Alan’s piece alludes to.
Whites now face universally harsh environment.
We have the tradition of Southern kinship to see us to a new consensus where we perceive ourselves as members of an exclusive racial caste that must use our superior sightedness, hearing, and knowledge to shape the dark burgeoning world that surrounds us, and to bring it to heel in a fashion that strengthens and assures our racial future.
#2 by Dave on 02/09/2007 - 6:02 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
“Investors form a crowd whose collective action reflects a key aspect of man’s nature as a social animal: He is strongly induced to adopt the feelings and convictions of the group.”
“In a realm such as investing, in which SO FEW ARE KNOWLEDGEABLE, the TENDENCY TOWARD DEPENDENCE IS VIRTUALLY IMPULSIVE.”
“As a result, market decisions are steered not by the rational decisions of individual minds, but by the peculiar collective sensibilities of the herd. The pervasive dependence among its members produces an emotional interpersonal dynamic that, like all feedback mechanisms, has form.”
Comment by Robert Prechter
I urge our readers to consider Prechter’s statement very carefully, as it should be generalized beyond the investment arena to the political culture as a whole.
It explains WHY “regimes” such as Political Correctness are able to gain such astonishing ascendancy in the face of all reason.
But it also explains WHY people like BW have huge influence.
Aldous Huxley was fond of repeating: “Want to solve your problems? Learn a new way of seeing.”
But Huxley omitted Prechter’s insight which explains the REAL REASON “the multitudes” are so sheepish: Their ignorance compels them to imitate others in the hopes that those they imitate know more than they.
Accordingly, a singular “seer” such as BW, can transform an entire culture.
These things move fast for entire eras have a habit of dying suddenly.
New worlds get born overnight.
Don’t underestimate the insights posted to this blog. They are more important than you imagine.