not spam
not spam

Oh, well, there is always Dave and Mark and Simmons. That’s the best “ole bob” is going to get. Bob knows it. Angry people. He counts himself lucky to get you angry people. Thinking people won’t be found on this blog. I dare say they won’t be welcome. My experience here says they won’t be welcome. Only lockstep, heel-clicking yes men need apply. I noticed that. Some time ago. Every time I introduced a serious idea that might make a little bit of sense I have found that there is a small cadre of knuckledraggers that attack not my ideas but me personally. That tells me that there is no one in Bob’s camp who has any independence of mind. Well, that makes sense. There is a lot of misinformation on this blog. The same old weak arguments about “defeatism” and “surrender” are hoisted up the moment anything is introduced that may make just a little bit of sense. This blog is like a highway to nowhere.

MrWebb

ME:

Poor baby! You are not only unappreciated, you are less apreciated than you describe. Not only do I not appreciate your “new” ideas, I have yet to SEE one. Bitching about the media was old when I was a boy, defeatism is as old as treason, and personal insults are as old as primates.

Every anti-white always tells us his “new” ideas. He honetly thinks he thought of them, and they are always the same crap we have heard since Kindergarten. Maybe you honestly believe you have said something I haven’t heard since I reached my teens, but I can’t see anything like that in your writings.

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

While this is an interesting post, I don’t think it has a solid point. You seem to dislike it when people marry for love and when people marry for money. You say they should marry solely for aesthetics. But aesthetics is something you get used to — that’s why it’s discussed as only as a mere preference. You get used to what your partner looks like — this is why ugly people look less ugly as you become more familiar with them. The parents don’t seem to care what their children look like since they are acquainted with them from birth. And I have never any non-white say, “I wish I were white.”

Just for fun, I searched Google: 898 results for “I wish I were white” — 253 or so results for “I wish I were black” and 248 for Asian to put it in context.

If you grow up looking a certain way, you cannot imagine looking differently, nor would you seriously want to, unless you were a Semite in the Third Reich.

P.S. Are the browns in Brazil really going crazy over the blonds in Brazil because they are blond or because they look “exotic”? (Like the inverse of what we think of exotic here).

–Al Parker

ME:

All the old carp n one package.

“You seem to dislike it when people marry for love and when people marry for money. You say they should marry solely for aesthetics. ” Yes, and if you criticize Jews, you are a Nazi, right? I said that if you sell out yur race, you are prostituting yourself. Mney isnot forever, miscegenation is. We are talkng about women who prefer white looks but are wlling to have permanently ugly ofspring for money.

Think a litt,e there, Al.

And the old one abut how exotic is beautiful! I’ve heard THAT one all my life! Bay Watch was a worldwide favorite, whoever was exotic. There is no evolutinary justification for blodnes except to compete on looks. Peacock males would not have that fan if they were fighting for bare survival against other species.

Thank a little, there, Al.

“If you grow up looking a certain way, you cannot imagine looking differently, nor would you seriously want to, unless you were a Semite in the Third Reich.”

You just pointed ut that people WANT to be white.

Are you thinking AT ALL, Al?