Archive for March 2nd, 2007
Look at “Eidelheim” Below!
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 03/02/2007
Cyberroots Rebellion
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 03/02/2007
The story is that the Reformation was the result of a GRASSROOTS rebellion. This grassroots rebellion was the direct result of the printing press.
There is a distinction here. It is the sort of distinction I made a good living explaining. It is the lesson I offer you free. But you have been reading Bob’s stuff so long you probably consider it obvious. Everything I say is obvious, in retrospect. But the people who paid me knew it in PROSPECT, and they won.
OK, I hope to you it is obvious: The revolt of those who could READ that was the Reformation was anything BUT grassroots. They did read to the illiterate masses, but the basis of the revolt was a new class, middle class which could READ.
Anyone who makes his living in television knows that it is critical to reach the right demographic. Peasants in the days of Luther were largely still pagan. They went to church the way Japanese peasants have icons of Buddha, Christ, and Shinto deities. The Lutheran/Calvin revolt was not grassroots, it was a rebellion on the part of the new ruling demographic.
The reason people paid me money was for observations so obvious that, when they become generally accepted, you wonder why the HELL someone would pay MONEY to a person who claims it was some kind of Special Wisdom.
But if you are fanatic like me, you couldn’t care less. It worked. Now to the next problem.
It should be obvious, and isn’t, that a Cyberroots rebellion is different from a grassroots rebellion. After a few thousand of us marched for Confederate flag over the South Carolina capitol building, there was really massive march AGAINST it. Tens of thousands of blacks packed the street to the extent of the Million Man March in DC, to the point where they were jammed so tightly they had trouble breathing. They won, because it was supposed to be a GRASSROOTS revolt.
They were led by the clerics in backwards collars and with Bob Jones’s timely support, but it was solid black.
So I asked, “What percentage of the anti-flag masses were SWING votes?” In our few thousand, some hated Beasley and some might still vote Republican. But every single person in those hundred thousand ant-flaggers was a committed liberal.
When it comes to politics, the grassroots are meaningless.
Let’s do some real political arithmetic:
Bob Joes IV or XIV or whoever he is will sell out to the highest bidders. All of his slaves will vote Republican. He has family business to run. The blacks and the guys with the backward collars will vote liberal Democrat. So if I were getting paid to advise on POLITICS, I’d say you better forget the apparent grassroots and pay attention to the people who have OPINIONS.
So what is the demographic that sane people are looking for?
MTV’s desperate attempt to get its watchers, tens of millions of them, out to vote is one of the best-known failures in popular history.
Those poor bastards! I’ve BEEN there! MTV is run by overaged hippies. They were Young Radicals in the NINETEEN SIXTIES for God’s sake! Has anybody taken a look at a CALENDAR lately? But they figured “I am a young radical in the year 2000 and when I say ‘young radical’ in 2000 AD all these young folks will sign on and get out there and vote anti-racist.”
You never heard abut it when a Soviet space shot failed, complete with lots of dead people. You never hear about it when a Radical Initiative goes pfsst. The MTV campaign went pffst.
A Cyber Revolt is entirely different from the Workers’ Class crap Jane Fonda dreams about.
I used to get paid for observations like this. Maybe it’s worth your thinking abut.
Adelheim
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 03/02/2007
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Concentrate on RACE!
When I argue the mantra on the internett I explain that whites have a birthrate about 1.2. And that means that we are losing about 40% each generation. (then it is pretty obvious to people what way our race is headed) And what we need, is to get more WHITE children. Not adopted non-whites and not mixed blood children. We need white children in order to preserve whites.
And I say that I think every race has I right to exist, including the WHITE race.
If somebody calls me a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews, I ask them:
You just condemnd me. If your aim is NOT to genocide the white race why is it that you condemn EVERYBODY who wants to preserve it?
Take the “moral highground” (if that is a English word I can use) and accuse and condemn anti-racist of wanting to genocide the white race. Then they are in a bad position. Then they try to hide behind that they only want to have freedom of religion, human rights or something else.
Then I ask them: If your aim is NOT to genocide the white race why is it that your arguments ALWAYS boils down to having more non-whites and fewer whites?
Adelheim_
AFKAN
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 03/02/2007
In the midst of an otherwise sensible discussion, The Artist Formerly Kuown as Nobody Puts this non sequitor:
“And, incidentally, by framing the issue of RACE in terms of FAMILY, the door is opened to RACE as the Living Bridge between Family and Culture. You will, of course, recognize Peter Shank’s formulation of our focus – FAMILY, RACE and CULTURE.”
To start with, if Peter Schank’s formulation WORKED we wouldn’t have the problem we have now. I deeply resent someone’s tossing in the name of some other writer on the blog this way. If his formulation WORKED, I wouldn’t have to do this blog.
Take the Mantra and stick “Family, Race and Culture” in instead of race and see how effective it is.
WOW! Comments (5)
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 03/02/2007
I ended “Cyberroots Rebellion” with “I used to get paid for observations like this. Maybe it’s worth your thinking about.”
Be careful what you ask for!
AFKAN and four others THOUGHT about it. I am looking forward to tomorrow when I have the energy to THINK about what they thought of.
What a crowd! Damn, I’m proud of you.
1 Comment