Archive for October, 2013
White Rabbit Interview
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 10/21/2013
A commenter says Horus will be intervieiwed at 8 PM on Renegade Radio:
“Horus the Avenger will be interviewed by Kyle Hunt on http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com this Monday, Oct 21, at 8:00pm Eastern.
Log on to http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com to access the stream.”
.
I know absolutely nothing about RR, but ignorance doesn’t stop the SPLC, so why should it it matter to me? The whole point of their article about White Rabbit was to tell the world his name and address, but they got his age wrong.
I took one quick look, and Renegade Radio is tiny and says so.
I plan to listen in but I don’t want White Rabbitts acknowledge me personally.
There is very little that is more of a turnoff to listeners — and in this case I use the word “turnoff” literally — that having two insiders talk about each other in aninterview. This a very easy mistake to make, I made it in myelf in my last inteview with James Edwards. It is so much easier to think of something to say to someone you know than something of interest to the audience at large.
Which is exacly WHY there are lots of people who can talk to individuals and so few who can talk to audiences.
While preparing this article, it occurred to me that, unlike White Rabbit, this sort of very small scale exposure to being interviewed is needed by RANK AND FILE BUGSERS.
If you screw up, you are anonymous and it would be hard to find a single person who ever heard it.
In return, a really tiny show would appreciate the few extra listeners we mght provide.
We could have a policy of announcing such interviews. Hopefully, some will here will listen and call in just to make it a good way for a small show to get a little boost.
I emphasize that we are not offering Horus or my services here. The purpose would be for BUGSERS without experience to one to get it AND give our message some extra exposure.
It is just POSSIBLE that if it became known that tiny interview shows had a BUGSER on, they would get a predictable tiny addition to their listener numbers.
The chances of this working are probably a hundred to one against.
By now a lot of you have far more practical knowledge about things like this than I do. There could be something wrong with it that is obvious to you but not to me.
That is why are are a SEMINAR.
The Legal Blockade
Posted by Bob in Bob's Meanderings on 10/18/2013
I have repeatedly made the point that there are hundreds of thousands of people who are looking for a picture of a starving child or a violation of Political Correctness with all the desperation Americans used to reserve for finding gold ore. This is of enormous, immediate,and practical importance.
In the 1950s when my brother was an intern it was well known that clinics for the poor got better drugs than the rich people did. The reason for this was well-known, one of those Public Secrets I talk about. Poor clinics could use new drugs, whereas drugs used in regular hospitals had to go through the whole many-years-long end of clearance process with the FDA.
Please note that what was universally known was that poor patients were getting BETTER drugs. If you needed a drug that was still going through the final stages of FDA approval, you got them if you were poor, you couldn’t get them for love nor money in a regular clinic or hospital.
Needless to say, even back then, organizations saw a gold mine. A major campaign exposed the outrageous fact that drugs that were not ready for prime time were OK to be used on poor people. Lots of people made lots of money pushing this cause.
So by the 1960s the poor people were only getting drugs which had gone through the WHOLE clearance process. So they got the same outdated stuff the rich did.
Even today it is well known that “all new drugs are nonaddictive.” Valium was approved by the FDA as nonaddictive. So was just about every other addictive drug now on Schedule 2 (Schedule 1 drugs are illegal, like heroine. There is Schedules 3 and 4, going down the count to over the counter).
My point is that even the endless regulatory process used by the FDA does not really make drugs safer. In fact, until equality raised its ugly head, it was well known that, on average, early approval for the poor made their drugs famously more modern and better.
The regulation is not to make things safer. Regulation depends on how much money can be raised on an issue.
If you had looked at the facts, this was a clear conclusion sixty years ago with the Public Secret that poor folks got better drugs than the rich did.
But no one looks at the basics.
There’s gold in them thar hills! There is MONEY in a Conspiracy Theory where the Rich and Powerful (says the left) or the Establishment (says the right}, secretly plot Evil.
There is not a dime to be made by explaining reality as I just have.
Listen Slowly
Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 10/18/2013
There is no hidden meaning here. It is just advice to those on my side.
I got paid to be an interrogator. If you ask someone what an interrogator does, he will normally respond with what the verb means in Latin: Ask questions.
But a moment’s thought will tell you that asking is not a GOOD interrogator’s main job, despite the title.
From suspects to committee hearings, “Get Whitaker in on it” was not only because of what Whitaker might ASK, but what Whitaker might HEAR.
In one hearing, a big one on a BATF proposal that ammunition be registered, my boss was there as Ranking Member and I was standing behind him, whispering in his ear like Beelzebub.
This is the kind of hearing most people see, the congressman with the staffer whispering to him.
Most real hearings feature an absence of congressmen, staff doing the questioning, but these are not televised.
This time not only was John there, but Bob had to be standing right behind him. Bob had to be “in on it.”
John asked, I LISTENED. This is one of the clearest examples of why they wanted Bob in on it and what an interrogator does.
At one point John asked the BATF witness the standard question about whether this ammunition registration was part of a plan leading to registration of all guns.
A note: Both congressmen and even senior staffers are sometimes witnesses at committees and we are always preparing to deal with questions from all sides. We know what “prepping,” preparing, consists of.
I stepped up behind John and whispered, “They aren’t prepped on that question. Sic em, Boss.”
He sicced em. He asked that witness eight more times the same question, “Is this a first step to national gun registration?”
Then John put him on oath. It was not a formal investigation so the witnesses had not been sworn. John demanded that, given the runaround he had been given, that question would be answered under oath, i.e., at risk of perjury.
Sure enough, the answers, which had been runaround enough before, completely changed under oath.
So, “Bob was in on it” and all anybody saw was me step up for one short whisper.
Even in normal conversation it also makes a difference HOW you listen.
One who replies instantly is considered a featherhead.
And often IS.
I was not there as an extra mouth, but as an extra pair or EARS.
The BATF Brigade would have been infinitely more comfortable if John had simply repeated a question I had whispered in his ear.
They got very uncomfortable as John clearly ran my observation through his mind and contemplated HOW to “sic ’em.”
Most of my best advice gets lost in quick responses.
For example, much of my best counsel comes from rethinking basics. But everybody has heard the basics many times and has something he routinely says when one is mentioned.
That response takes up the crucial seconds during which he could have thought WHY I brought that particular basic up and what my point was. A quick response means that “Whitaker is not in on it.”
More generally, how quickly you answer is as much a part of your conversation as what you say. You notice the guy who has nothing to say.
Most people who have nothing to say, have nothing to say.
You also notice the featherhead who instantly gives an “answer” he would have given had you never been born.
And you notice the person who is listening. He is not the Cone of Silence who might be trying to look Silent and Wise. He is the guy who runs what you said through his brain and THEN has a comment.
One of the first things an interrogator learns is to sort out the OTHER listeners from the featherheads and the Owl Brains.
The person who is listening can make you nervous, but he also makes talking worth while.
Labels Will Not Cower Me
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 10/15/2013
If only Communists condemn exploitation, then I am a Communist; so if only Nazis oppose White Genocide, I am a Nazi.
If only extremists oppose the establishment, then I am an extremist; so if only White Supremacists are not anti-white, then I am a White Supremacist.
If only Politically Incorrect people support free speech, I am proud to stand beside them.
A label is the weapon of one who has lost the argument.
A Little Less Respectability, a Little More Guts
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 10/13/2013
I am getting mail about which anti-White Genocidists BUGSERS should march with. Some of our miniscule band are worried about our “image.”
William Rusher told me that when the National Review building in New York was being built around 1954, George Lincoln Rockwell was there almost every day, lending a hand! The NR crowd, which had not weeded out the Acceptable anti-liberals yet, even agreed to debate with him about Jews.
They made an appointment to debate with him in return for his services, but they sent an archbishop to the restaurant. To me that was the first demonstration of respectable conservative courage.
If I had accepted a man’s help and promised to argue with him, I would be honor-bound to give him the promised debate man-to-man. But manhood is banned among respectables.
I am not a Leader. I give opinions. My stand has already been expressed to Jimmy Marr: He took our message to a march with Nazis and Confederates because he couldn’t take them anywhere else where there was publicity.
I would suggest a few signs that say, “Are only Nazis against White Genocide?”
But let me remind you WHY only the swastika and open Confederate flag wavers and Jimmy get on the news: They are the only ones with the guts TO GET OUT THERE.
People who don’t have the guts to post the Mantra in bathroom stalls do not make revolutions.
But if you aren’t out there with a sign saying “Are only Nazis against White Genocide?” why are you doing saying it to ME?
-
You are currently browsing the archives for October, 2013
Bob’s Books
Bob's first book - 1976
A Plague On Both Your HousesBob's second book - 1982
THE NEW RIGHT PAPERSBob's deadliest book - 2004
Why Johnny Can't Think:
America's Professor-PriesthoodWhy Johnny Can't Think ebook zip
pwrd: Phu=9Ad5
Recent Comments