On September 2, 2014 reports went out the world over. Another American reporter was beheaded by the Islamic State in the Levant. The very next day The Leader of The Free World professed that “Justice will be done for American Reporters.” Yet, I am the only one who asks two obvious basic questions. What the hell are American reporters doing in the Levant and what the hell are Al-Jazeera reporters doing in Ferguson, MO? Somehow, we are the only ones losing our heads over this.
Mommy Professor explicitly states that certain things are divinely untouchable. Right at the top of her list is her beloved and sacred religion, Political Correctness. The upper echelon of self-proclaimed “omnipotent demigods and professors of truth” who fit into the untouchable Priest class (Judges, Professors, Priests and Reporters – and in that order) fall right underneath. 
We know that they take themselves painfully serious because they have vested in each other the power to interpret words for us and take punitive action against those who use “the wrong words.”
Then they don special costumes so we can see them in the flock. In fact, the higher the Egyptian thread count on your black robe, the more serious we must take you.
Should our eyesight fail us, we are implored to “remain SILENT!” – “stop laughing!” and take the Priest Class “seriously” because they are dead-serious about supporting the anti-white establishment and its de facto national religion.
These Benevolent and Venerable Judges and their thought police not only interpret, but also enforce, the policy that Mommy Professor’s Priesthood has written. Their underlings, Progressive Liberal reporters, work tirelessly with the SPLC thugs and screamers to hunt down, silence and report on Whites who won’t submit to quote Diversity unquote.
Recently, Bob wrote about how the government threw $1 million #TruthyDollars at BUGS in hopes we’ll leave “Diversity” alone and go away.
Sorry Charlie. Attacking and silencing the simple truth ain’t that simple.
#1 by Bob on 10/14/2014 - 4:27 pm
Reporters are an integral part of the Privileged Class in Political Correctness.
In the 1950s, newspaper reports from New York routinely began with saying that reporters went on a bus or reporters got a good lunch and so forth.
Even in the totally New York centered 1950s, where nothing existed west or south of the Hudson, it slowly got across to reporters that readers didn’t CARE whether they had a good lunch or not.
#2 by Tom Bowie on 10/15/2014 - 11:44 am
When you see the Controlled Media avoid the topic of White GeNOcide it’s a reversal of what they’re accustomed to.
It’s AntiWhite Flight and they fear losing their AntiWhite Privilege.
They are lambs dressed as wolves terrified by the shearing to come.
#3 by WmWhite on 10/15/2014 - 12:58 pm
Interesting quote from an atheist left-winger and communist …who later became a right-wing, Catholic convert, fanatic, (Thomas Malcolm Muggeridge):
“So the final conclusion would surely be that whereas other civilizations have been brought down by attacks of barbarians from without, ours (White People) had the unique distinction of training its own destroyers at its own educational institutions, and then providing them with facilities for propagating their destructive ideology far and wide, all at the public expense …”
His description of White, anti-white traitors (my opinion), illustrates our greatest bane for the last century.
#4 by Jason on 10/15/2014 - 4:11 pm
Reporters are the Propagandists of Political Correctness. They don’t “report”. They mainly concoct.
The whole game of the PC side is to have a RIGGED game. They can’t win a fair and open debate. The men in dresses, whether in a Church or a Courtroom, are part of that.
#5 by Secret Squirrel on 10/16/2014 - 7:09 am
“The men in dresses, … Courtroom, are part of that.”
The PM of Australia was trying to look like a “big man”, by talking tough to the Muslims, he and his anti-White buddies have been importing.
He said he would tear up their passports, if they went overseas to fight with ISIS! In reply, one of the Islamic leaders waved his passport at the press and dared the PM to come tear it up. Of course the reply from the PM, was impotent silence. LOL
Even the most powerful men in the country, are afraid of the judicial cross dressers.
It reminded me of what the law did to California on immigration. The people voted to stop illegal immigration in the 1980s and of course the supreme court overturned it and now Whites are a minority in California.
Didn’t Whites create the legal system protect our interests? What is the point of it, when it is harming our interest? Why do we continue to obey it?
#6 by Jason on 10/16/2014 - 8:06 am
And here in the US clowns like Sean Hannity make big noises about fighting “radical Islam”. But in the next breath he states his support for mass immigration.
It concerns me that conservative audiences can be so easily fooled. They love watching him beat up on some Muslim cleric but never ask the obvious question: why do you support flooding the US and Europe with tens of millions of them?
#7 by Rob Roy on 10/16/2014 - 2:18 pm
They get upset because they’re not assimilating.
#8 by Mike M on 10/16/2014 - 1:45 pm
“It reminded me of what the law did to California on immigration. The people voted to stop illegal immigration in the 1980s and of course the supreme court overturned it and now Whites are a minority in California.”
Do you any link talking about this please ?
#9 by Mike M on 10/16/2014 - 1:47 pm
Ok I can’t edit so, was it he California Proposition 187 ?
#10 by Scott on 10/16/2014 - 2:50 pm
– Mike M.
It was called the “Save Our State initiative” or California prop 187
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_187
I was too young to remember it, but read about it in a textbook at college. We are DEFINITELY a minority here. I was only one of three white kids in my class growing up, and it was at a private Christian school.
#11 by Mike M on 10/16/2014 - 3:51 pm
It sounds a bit different from wht Secret Squirrel was talking about.
#12 by Secret Squirrel on 10/16/2014 - 6:33 pm
I likely got the date and story wrong, since I’m not American and have a crappy memory. I suggest you ask more knowledgeable locals like Bob.
What I understand is Americans vote for a law to protect their interest in their state. Then the unelected judge activists swoop in and declare it “unconstitutional” – according to their opinion.
Makes you wonder why they don’t dispense with this sham of voting and just declare the men in black dresses, their Queens.
#13 by Carloman on 10/17/2014 - 1:39 pm
Governor Gray Davis refused to defend the law in federal court, even though, as governor, it was his duty to defend state law in federal court, so he was basically saying that he agreed that the law was unconstitutional. He was removed from office in a recall election shortly after that, but, by then, it was too late to reverse the ruling.
#14 by Tom Bowie on 10/15/2014 - 9:03 pm
“Whites think discrimination against Whites is a bigger problem than bias against Blacks” http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/10/08/white-people-think-racial-discrimination-in-america-is-basically-over/
(Screamers) “Anger at controversial PBS project on the ‘hardships’ of being White: Critics round on ‘The Whiteness Project'” http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2793433/new-campaign-features-white-people-explaining-hardships-white-america.html
http://www.whitenessproject.org/checkbox
Interesting
#15 by Secret Squirrel on 10/16/2014 - 7:18 am
Great points made on that Daily Mail article. They are tearing down the wall.
#16 by Lord Nelson on 10/16/2014 - 2:02 pm
Sorry if this is a bit off topic and apologies to the BUGSers who are up to speed on this. But I feel it’s important to point out the obvious Anti-White trick about debating White privilege in White countries:
Can anyone see how retarded this is. And how this plays right in to the hands of the Anti-White establishment?
Arguing about whether there is or is not White privilege in traditional White countries is like playing poker for your own house. So if you lose, you lose your home. And if you win, you get to keep what was yours in the first place. No wonder the Anti-Whites are so keen to keep sparking this debate. They are playing a game were they have nothing to lose and everything to gain. Plus, every time they trick a Pro-White in to arguing that there is NO White privilege in a country like the USA, the Pro-White is in effect arguing that Whites have no right to that particular White country. Dugh!
Reality: There IS and there SHOULD be, White privilege in White countries. Just like there IS and there SHOULD be, Asian privilege in Asian countries and Jewish privilege in Israel etc.. etc..
I propose the BUGS response to Anti-Whites claiming White privilege in a White country is to point out the Asian privilege in Asian countries etc.. Of course we do this while at the same time staying on message.
For example:
1. Why do Anti-Whites not complain about Asian privilege in Asian countries?
2. Why does White privilege in White countries upset Anti-Whites?
#17 by ElectricWhiteRabbit on 10/16/2014 - 2:49 pm
@Lord Nelson I have to disagree with one point you’ve made. You claim there IS White privilege in White countries. That is utterly false, would you call affirmative action, racial quotas, ect “White privileged? We DON’T have “privilege” because we DON’T even have a country in the first place to have that so called “privilege” Can you name me ONE area where we can escape “diversity” aka White genocide? I know I can’t.
Of course bringing up or even debating “White privilege” to an anti-White would be a HUGE waste of time on our part, though when one does bring up ‘White privilege” I like to throw it back at their face.
“When are you going to attack Black privilege in Jamaica?”
When are you going to attack Hispanic privilege in Mexico? Is FORCING “diversity” aka White genocide in ALL and ONLY White countries “privilege?”
#18 by Lord Nelson on 10/16/2014 - 3:31 pm
I understand your disagreement on that point. But the important thing is we both appear to agree on the correct BUGS approach to dealing with the Anti-White scam argument, about White privilege in White countries.
#19 by Mike M on 10/16/2014 - 3:49 pm
Our forefathers worked hard through famine, diseases, wars and harshtimes for us to have a better life than our predecessors in the country of our ancestors.
“Anti-racists” would like us to be stripped from our legacy to give it to people it doesn’t belong to.
“Anti-racists” don’t go to other countries asking for those people to relinquish the heritage transmitted to them by their ancestors. They only required that of White people.
They claim to be “anti-racists” but what they really are is anti-white.
“White privilege” is a code word for White Heritage.
“Anti-racists” is a code word for anti-white.
#20 by Carloman on 10/17/2014 - 1:30 pm
There is a kind of catch-22 here.
We can either say that there are White countries and White privilege, or that there are no White countries or White privilege.
If we say that White countries exist, anti-Whites will say that there is no White genocide because White countries still exist.
If we say that White countries don’t exist, anti-Whites will say that non-Whites are not flooding into White countries because White countries don’t exist.
It is like the person who says that the defendant was wrong to kill in self-defense because the person he killed had only drawn his gun but hadn’t fired yet. But you don’t want to wait until he fires first, because then it may be too late.
So we have to word it carefully. We can say that White countries exist because every race has the right to its own lands, but that genocide is still happening because we are loosing those lands to non-Whites. White privilege scarcely exists anymore, but it should exist in White countries, and if any still exists, then that is perfectly proper.
#21 by Secret Squirrel on 10/16/2014 - 6:40 pm
“Arguing about whether there is or is not White privilege in traditional White countries is like playing poker for your own house. So if you lose, you lose your home. And if you win, you get to keep what was yours in the first place.”
Excellent point.
#22 by Scott on 10/17/2014 - 5:07 pm
This should be your answer when asked about “White Privilege.”(or some variation of this)
I believe that White Privilege does exist.
Whites are privileged to have all and only white countries flooded with non whites until they become minorities in all their countries.
Whites are privileged to be told that they don’t exist while being blamed for the worlds problems.
Whites are privileged to have people use hate speech to intimidate them into promoting the Genocide/Ethnically Cleansing of their own people.
See how that works? White privilege is THEIR MANTRA. White Genocide is OUR MANTRA. We don’t want to roll in THEIR grey goo. We want them to roll in ours. Flip their mantra on them using ju jitsu, and always bring it straight back to white genocide.
“White Privilege” IS White Genocide!!!
#23 by Denounce Genocidists on 10/18/2014 - 5:02 pm
“White Privilege” IS White Genocide!!!
Nice.
Also
“White Privilege” is a codeword for white genocide!” compliments our other stuff.
#24 by Undercover Lover on 10/18/2014 - 5:35 pm
I like
“White privilege is an anti-white conspiracy theory”
#25 by Scott on 10/18/2014 - 11:50 pm
Lol! Nice! I like that one too!
As long as we are
1. Using mantra type thinking.
and
2. bringing the conversation back to white genocide,
we will continue making progress.
#26 by Carloman on 10/18/2014 - 10:16 pm
It would have to be “Anti-White privilege is a codeword for White genocide.” Otherwise, it sounds as if we’re saying that White privilege is a bad thing.
I prefer “White privilege is a codeword for White self-determination.” But that doesn’t mention genocide, so perhaps the first one would be better.
#27 by Scott on 10/19/2014 - 12:01 am
– Carloman
As long as we are bringing the conversation back to white genocide, we are doing our job.
We don’t want to talk about white privilege, even if it does exist. the reason it is brought up is to lead you to their next point, which is that since white privilege exists, you as a privileged white person need to shut up. The whole discussion is a verbal trap. Stay away from it. Never concede its points. Just get yourself out of its trap. It’s like the “racist” meme. Unloop it and then talk about white genocide or antiwhite bigotry. How you do it is up to you. We all have our own styles, but they all have the same message.
#28 by Carloman on 10/19/2014 - 12:16 am
What about the mini-Mantra that begins:
Nobody complains about Japanese privilege in Japan.
Nobody complains about Chinese privilege in China.
Do you think that that is not an effective response?
I think that that’s a good way of flipping the script, even better than saying that White are privileged to have Affirmative Action, Hate Speech laws, etc. The reason I say that is because a lot of people oppose Affirmative Action and hate speech laws, but are still clueless about White genocide. I think they may read “Japanese privilege” and have an “A-ha” moment. However, I am still open to other opinions on this, and am interested in hearing other opinions and the responses others have gotten from anti-Whites to various formulations.
#29 by Scott on 10/19/2014 - 1:21 pm
While I think it is good and better then simply trying to argue with it. I feel that it is still a concession to the other side that gets the conversation revolving around privilege.
By sarcastically pointing out the antiwhite hypocrisy calling those things “privileges” it shows the ugliness of what antiwhites are promoting. AntiWhite policies.
I will say that pointing out that no one complains about Japanese or Chinese privilege is pretty good. I understand that everyone has their own style and own preferences. I personally think that I will prefer the way I just proposed. Perhaps you might try it out and see what you like better. Either way, as long as we figure out how to change the subject from privilege to genocide, we’re staying on point.
Thank you Carloman for your insight.
#30 by Scott on 10/18/2014 - 11:45 pm
– Thanks DG
Any variation of it really, as long as it gets us out of the “white privilege” loop, and back into the white genocide loop.
Why do they want to talk about “white privilege?” Because they want us to shut up about pointing out their antiwhite bigotry and antiwhite supremacism. Even if you believe whites are privileged, never concede their point. It the same as trying to say “I’m not a racist, but…..” We are at war. If your enemy is doing something right, you don’t let him know.
A great way to get out of their loop is when if they ask you if white privilege exists, you could say something like…….
Does White Privilege Exist?
Whites are privileged to be told that they don’t have a culture.
Whites are privileged to be told they don’t exist, but at the same time are blamed for the worlds problems.
Whites are privileged to have laws(affirmative Action) that systematically discriminate against them in school and the workplace based on the color of their skin.
Whites are privileged to be the recipients of hate speech (“racist,” “hater,” “fascist,” “naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews,”) when they object to programs purposely designed to make them minorities.
Whites are privileged to be expected to celebrate becoming a minority in every white country on the planet in 40 years.
Yes, I believe White Privilege does exist. It is the privilege of being ethnically cleansed and expected to be exuberant in participation.
White Privilege IS White GeNOcide!
Now that you’ve got it, run with it!!! As long as your finding ways to talk about white genocide, and not “white privilege” we are winning.
#31 by Scott on 10/17/2014 - 5:10 pm
– Bob
I think that you should give your next lesson on this.
#32 by Mimmy Jarr on 10/19/2014 - 5:30 pm
Here is your lesson for today:
If you want to use the j3ws media to insert the phrase “white genocide” into the public discourse, you must generate television interviews in which you talk about virtually nothing but j3ws, and mention “white genocide” only once.
The j3wsmedia editors will inevitably select for the only thing you didn’t say about their masters.
Here’s an example. I gave them a 20 minute monologue on the host modification parasitism of biological j3wry and this is what emerged.
This is deep magic, my friend. Never talk about anything but j3ws.
Remember: If you don’t mention the j3w, it won’t come true.
http://www.kmtr.com/news/local/Community-rallies-against-racism-after-anti-diversity-fliers-handed-out-at-Springfield-HS-279684752.html?tab=video&c=y
#33 by Scott on 10/19/2014 - 12:03 am
We should really have a lesson on this one Bob. Its antiwhites biggest meme. BUGSers need to know how to deflect it.
#34 by Denounce Genocidists on 10/19/2014 - 12:51 pm
“Its antiwhites biggest meme”
Got me thinking that I can only recall seeing it used in the US.
With Google I came to this:
http://www.rota.org.uk/content/%E2%80%9Cwhite-privilege%E2%80%9D-useful-concept-current-uk-context
Is “White Privilege” a useful concept in the current UK context?
Submitted by saifurv on Tue, 26/08/2014 – 15:35
Andy Gregg Blog
blog
ROTA blog
by Andy Gregg, Chief Executive, Race on the Agenda.
In the United States over the last 30years a useful concept has been developed which we could do with discussing much more on this side of the Atlantic. This is the concept of ”white privilege”.
———————-
Some young Turk UK anti-whites could really lower the boom on us.
#35 by -Sentinel- on 10/19/2014 - 11:59 am
Only an anti-White could believe in White Privilege.
The only way to “cure” White Privilege is to not be White. That is racial hatred.
White Privilege is code for “I Hate White People.”