Archive for November, 2014

GENETIC MORALITY — AGAIN

Jo3w commented that anti-white Christians are anti-white because they assume whites are more supreme than we are.

I replied:

jow3, My problem with what you say is based on my constant repetition that Western morality is based on the Christian lack of morality.

The sore point Old Testament believers have with science is Six Day Creationism.

The sore point with Christianity is never mentioned.

Much more than the Old Testament has a problem with Creationism, the New Testament has the problem that WE EXIST!

One reason Bible Belters quote the Old rather than the New Testament is because there is no FAMILY morality in the New Testament.

To Jesus and St Paul, the very IDEA of family was heresy.

So Christianity went back to the old pagan morality of Human Sacrifice which said that only the best should be sacrificed to the Gods.

Early Christian myths described couples out of the Hitler Youth Guidebook, tall, intelligent, beautiful. In the ideal ending, they would be chaste and childless, for God.

Look at all the popular Nun Movies, where a beautiful talented woman remains chaste.

God wants only the best human sacrifices.  photo abraham3.jpg

It is on the assumption that whites are supreme that the entire basis of our self-destruction is based.

It never OCCURS to anti-white whites that there IS any other race for sacrifice — diversity — than the white one.

Christians, including C.S. Lewis, have long been able to accept their faith without the Six Day Creation clearly stated at the Bible’s beginning.

But they absolutely refuse to accept a genetic morality, without which the Golden Rule has no meaning at all.

Audio Bob

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

37 Comments

Race and Occam’s Law

Occam’s Law destroyed the main paycheck of Mommy Professor in his day, Scholasticism.

It is also called Occam’s Razor, because it cut out the crap. Occam’s Razor simply stated that the cause of something was probably the obvious one. So if your foot hurt, it was probably because you stubbed your toe yesterday and not because Socrates could be interpreted, if you really knew your nuances in ancient Greek, that the Great God Zoot has visited you in the night.

According to Mommy Professor, skin color means nothing.

Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, going by Occam’s Law, Skin color is EVERYTHING.

You know the standard of living and average income of any country simply by knowing what color its people are.

On Planet Earth, you know how safe a neighborhood is by the color of its inhabitants.

There are two approaches you can take to this. The Scholastics wrote endlessly trying to make the reality of everything depend on highly complicated interpretations of Classics and the established religion.  photo chipmunk.jpg

Occam’s Razor was the beginning of the end for centuries of Mommy Professors who made their living  on the Scholastic crap.

Everybody is perfectly aware that reality on Planet Earth starts with skin color.

No sane discussion of social issues can be held until we start with the reality, rather than the hideously complicated attempts to explain it away, which is required by our established religion.

No one seems to notice that even Mommy Professors explanations are purely racial.

Every discourse by Mommy Professor blames the comparatively awful state of non-whites on what whites did to them. It never even OCCURS to anybody that non-whites can be blamed for doing anything wrong, because our history is based on the concept we all accept that it does not matter what non-whites do.

Mommy Professor’s non-whites are as helpless as any other animal. No one blames a baboon or a hippo or a nonwhite for anything.

Even Mommy Professor’s reality has to be based on a reality we all take so much for granted that we don’t even see it:

Whites are supreme, in fact they are the only causal group on Planet Earth.

People, white and nonwhite, are as likely to blame non-whites for anything as they are to blame a chipmunk.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

15 Comments

If You Believe Your Land is Stolen, Get the Hell OFF of It!

I wrote this after I had submitted the article below.

Someone suggested that using this point might distract from concentrating on the Mantra.

It was an excellent point, but, for me, it was wonderful to hear it.

Now I have, after almost twenty years of effort, a cadre that can MAKE a criticism like that!  photo aztecs.jpg

Can you imagine anyone in the maze of argument and “somebody ought tos” I spent all those years in saying “That might distract from THE point!?”

For me, the fact that it is a valid criticism is totally buried in the sheer joy of this little team of professionals it took so long to develop.

In my own case. I have used this truth, you can hardly call it just an argument, when it was a good lead in to the whole subject, as when some idiot at a cocktail party would start blubbering about how we stole the land from the Indians.

I think it is a good point, but BUGSERS have to make sure they don’t waste precious time dragging it in. But at the right time and place, it really puts some crocodile-tearing, loud-mouthed fashionable anti-white in his place.

So here it is:

Whenever White Genocide is discussed, there is the chorus about how whites stole the land.

Grant that. What is the FIRST obligation of any receiver of stolen goods?

Is a person who believes his property has been stolen from others obligated, first and foremost, to denounce the OTHER people who committed the robbery?

No. Any sane person knows that, IF YOU FEEL YOU HAVE STOLEN GOODS, then your first obligation is to RETURN them to whomever you insist is the RIGHTFUL owner.

The first obligation of an Australian who really believes Australia was stolen from the aborigines or any American who honestly believes America was stolen from the Indians is TO GET THE HELL OUT!

Every adult knows that you cannot hold onto stolen property while denouncing the OTHER thieves.

No Indian or Abo would be happier than I would be if these crocodile-tear-shedding, “The White man STOLE America!” types were to hop on a boat and go elsewhere.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

16 Comments

Jason’s comment and Re lesson: Most of Your Best Work Won’t be YOUR Work.

Jason:

“Some guy on Fox News made the following comment about some silly accusation of racism. He said many today people believe that …

‘Racist’ is just code for shut up White guy.

Whether he knows it or not, he’s been influenced by BUGS.

Something like that would actually make a good comeback. Maybe:

Racist is just a code word for shut up you White person.

(Kinda off topic but thought it worth mentioning.)”

——-

Jason,  you spotted a BUGS Trademark on FOX and then like a pro you asked if it could be useful to BUGS.

Right there is the BUGS approach and attitude 100%.

Bob’s Article January 12th, 2014 – Most of Your Best Work Won’t be YOUR Work.

http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2014/01/12/most-of-your-best-work-wont-be-your-work/

 

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

11 Comments

Wikiworld

HD in his fine article mentioned Ryan Holiday, writer of Trust Me, I’m Lying.

One thing in that book I truly enjoyed was Holiday’s sobbing over The Good Old Days.

Holiday is about 40, so it is especially funny to me to see his shedding tears over how the Web has ended the times when Honest Men controlled the news!

Holiday says that the web has ruined the news, which used to be provided with total honesty and neutrality by the New York Times, 60s news monopoly by PBS, by the Washington Post, and above all by CBS, NBC, and ABC.

As the Devil sings in the “Damn Yankees!”: “Ah, Those Were the Good Old Days!”

When Holiday bemoans the death of the old news monopoly, he is deadly serious. He sounds for all the world like a speaker at the Daughters of the American Revolution talking about how George Washington could never tell a lie. photo jonstewart1.jpg

Holiday starts his book by announcing that his hero is Jon Leibowitz, aka, Jon Stewart.

This is pretty typical of Holiday’s world view: His idea of a truth teller is someone who doesn’t even give his real name.

Actually, I lived and worked through Holiday’s Time of Truth. That experience caused me to ask, first of all:

“Why is this information produced?”

Holiday bemoans these Latter Days when absolutely nobody claims to produce information because it is true.

But there is not a single thing that has CHANGED from Holiday’s New York communications monopoly to the present web culture. On Wikipedia, you can see which side wrote the definitions there, but, unless you were a truly wonked-out Believer in Political Correctness, you could tell what the point of view was of anybody who wrote for the Monopoly Media.

In fact, you couldn’t get a writing job, God knows you couldn’t get a high-level political job, if from the first paragraph what the writer’s political point of view was could not be known.

Holiday is bent out of shape by the web culture because he was a babe in the woods before.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

12 Comments