The Chinese government says it’s “helping” Tibetans. It even allows Tibetan-language newspapers.
Meanwhile, the Chinese government is FORCING massive non-Tibetan immigration into Tibet.
That’s Genocide. 
But of course they’re not CALLING it genocide.
The Chinese government calls it “skilled immigration” and “development”. The deputy party secretary of Tibet, Hao Peng, stated: “The flow of human resources follows the rule of market economics and is also indispensable for the development of Tibet”.
A Mommy Professor, Robert Barnett, protects the Chinese government: “I think we have to get over any suggestion that the Chinese are ill-intentioned or trying to wipe out Tibet.”
It’s so absurd only a Mommy Professor and her spayed/neutered followers would take it seriously.
Meanwhile, a Bugser would be asking: – “WHY is this ‘information’ being produced?”…
#1 by Rose on 03/03/2015 - 9:02 pm
Chinese Intellectuals haven’t come out with a peer-reviewed study on Tibetan Genocide…..
Conclusion: There is no Tibetan Genocide!
#2 by Jason on 03/04/2015 - 2:02 am
Bob said once that reality is pretty much WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get).
Genocide is genocide. Period.
Complification is always used by Mommy Professor. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Complification
Making straight forward SIMPLE observations is powerful. Repeating them until Mommy Professor is exposed is the key to winning.
#3 by polydoros on 03/04/2015 - 5:08 am
The Mommy Professor, Robert J. Barnett, who denies there is Tibetan Genocide writes about happenings in the “People’s Republic of China” (PRC). If he insults the PRC he isn’t allowed back. If he isn’t allowed back he can’t get his meal ticket.
For him, it’s either kowtow or don’t work. (No conspiracy needed.)
(Added incentive is this: He’s getting PAID by a seminary / university in the U.S., which supports White Genocide. And as many know, opponents of White Genocide use Tibetan Genocide as a comparison. So by denying TIBETAN Genocide, this Mommy Professor is indirectly denying WHITE Genocide; thus pleasing the priesthood of Political Correctness.)
#4 by Yankee Rebel on 03/04/2015 - 8:45 am
Add that, Chinese wild elephants are not being hunted to extinction for their tusks, they are simply dwindling in number. White people are not being genocided, they are not reproducing in sufficient numbers, etc. More fancy words covering up evil doings.
#5 by Bob on 03/04/2015 - 12:03 pm
Look at the quote!
It is FASCINATING to see the Chinese Government justifying immigration on a free market basis!
#6 by Bob on 03/04/2015 - 12:13 pm
Remember that the drill is:
“Genocide has nothing to do with violence.”
“Genocide is PURPOSELY bringing about the end of any race or ethnic group. (UN Convention on Genocide, Article 2).”
Best of all is if they quote the “violence” language to beat you in the debate. This destroys the ruling impression that
genocide = violence.
Don’t debate it.
When the enemy puts his foot in cowshit, resist the temptation to pull it out for them.
#7 by C Bear on 03/06/2015 - 7:20 am
There are several noticeable differences between the Tibetan genocide implemented by the Chinese government, and the White genocide happening in every White country.
The main difference which stands out most for me is CHOICE. While the Tibetan people are victims of an overbearing communist government still driven by the fear of Chairman Mao, Whites – as a whole – are not victims.
All victims by definition are powerless. We voluntary hand over “…a future for White children.” as a result of a psychological operation. We are only victims by choice, thus not victims at all.
Some time ago Bob made a blog entry here entitled something like, “D.G.I.C.T.A.: Don’t Get Involved – Call The Authorities”. Our children, however, ARE victims. The latest “hype” is the anti-bullying campaign targeting children and their parents.
When I was in 4th grade, there was a bully named Kevin. After several months of bullying other children, he started in on me. After several weeks I challenged him to a fight on one of the bullied kids’ front lawn, after school. I hit first. I won.
That evening my father was called by his father. I was guilty of throwing the 1st punch. Because of this I was forced to go to his house and apologize. This was one of the greatest character building experiences of my life. I learned to swallow my pride. He got an attitude adjustment, and the bullying stopped. We later became friends.
Because of D.G.I.C.T.A.’s latest anti-bullying campaign, our children are robbed of such experiences.
More importantly, this social conditioning program is molding our children into willing participants of an authoritarian/victim con-job.
How can the greatest race to ever walk the Earth voluntarily sacrifice a future which our ancestors bled and died for? It begins with D.G.I.C.T.A.
===========================
Bob,
Could you please direct me to your “D.G.I.C.T.A.” blog entry? I believe it is 4 or 5 years old. I attempted a search and was unable to locate it here. In my opinion it is one of your best.
#8 by Jason on 03/06/2015 - 8:33 am
There is this Porch Talk on Dicta: http://www.whitakeronline.org/audio/dicta.mp3
#9 by Yankee Rebel on 03/07/2015 - 1:36 am
Thank you, Jason, for that link to Bob’s porchtalk. I am so blown away after listening to it, that I will have to get back to y’all with my comments.
#10 by Jason on 03/07/2015 - 5:50 am
Yankee Rebel, you are welcome. Those Porch Talks are great. If you haven’t listened to the rest, just click on “Porch Talk” up near the top of the page. There are about 30 of them.
#11 by Jason on 03/07/2015 - 1:22 pm
Is Bob’s paper on Societal Property Rights available anywhere? I was searching for it and noticed it is mentioned in a recent article at a site called Chronicles Magazine, which seems to be about saving the Christian West.
They mention Bob’s paper in the second to last paragraph. But I’m afraid they must have misunderstood him because they only mention culture as being important.
http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2015/January/39/1/magazine/article/10826667/
#12 by Bob on 03/07/2015 - 4:17 pm
Societal Property Rights is my Paper in the New Right Papers, St. Martin’s Press, 1982. I conceived and edited the Papers.
I presented Societal Property Rights at several economic conventions, with a Nobel Prize winner present at one.
You know what happened.
Not a single professional economist disagreed with the concept, every Discussant openly agreed with it.
But nobody ever mentioned it afterwards.
#13 by Jason on 03/07/2015 - 5:01 pm
Well can’t one of them STEAL it! Nobody ever told me I had a right to worry about MY country. Or that I even had a country.