By jo3w
In medicine, progress can be made by experimentation. There is a very specific process, that if followed correctly, can yield a predictable result. One effective way to determine the utility of a treatment is to preform experiments on people. 
With any experimentation, especially when the results are unknown, it is highly unethical to preform an experiment on somebody which has not given their consent. Due to the possibility that the experiment may be detrimental to the subject, it is not only unethical, it is criminal.
Social science studies human behavior, they formulate a hypothesis based on data, then they attempt to test it by performing experiments. The problem occurs when the experiments take the form of public policy.
Many public policies that are enforced by law are nothing more than experiments to test a hypothesis. Social science routinely conducts experiments without the knowledge or consent of the subjects. Social science is completely unconcerned with the potential detrimental effects of its experiments. Social scientists take it a step further in that they encourage ridicule of those who openly protest being subjected to their experimentation!
What is an immoral criminal act in one discipline is considered another day at the office for social science.
#1 by WmWhite on 05/17/2015 - 11:48 pm
Very insightful article jo3w. You have illuminated a flawed double standard and reinforced for me why the social sciences are more inline with ‘prejudicial agendas’ and voodoo than with the scientific method.
#2 by RobRoy on 05/18/2015 - 3:28 am
Non-white immigration and assimilation forced on ALL and ONLY white countries is not a social experiment it is a deliberate act of white genocide.
#3 by jo3w on 05/21/2015 - 7:06 pm
The hypothesis is: The elimination of White people will bring social harmony. They think changing the word White to Whiteness will somehow throw us off the scent. Unfortunately they are not stupid, they are insane.
#4 by RobRoy on 05/18/2015 - 3:39 am
The social “scientists” are paid to invent silly “facts” to justify that genocide.
#5 by -backbaygrouch- on 05/18/2015 - 4:11 am
Social sciences could be called the polysyllabication of the obvious at best though in practice they are usually a subdivision of rhetoric. Since the advent, or descent if you prefer, of the Frankfurter School, the appellation of science is a howler.
#6 by Secret Squirrel on 05/18/2015 - 4:47 am
When I was a child of about 7 or 8 I remember standing at a school meet, where the head mistress told us about the multiculturalism policy for our country. She said it was going to be a grand experiment.Even as a little kid I sensed it was wrong. They were treating us like animals.
So how come an innocent child could see it was evil, but so called educated grownups couldn’t?
#7 by Jason on 05/18/2015 - 7:49 am
Yet “social scientist” don’t even try to test a hypothesis. When does any evidence ever change their mind?
And yes, their lack of concern for the impact of their experiments is chilling. They really are Orwellian Creeps.
OT: Great job on Bob’s new site: http://www.robertwwhitaker.com/
Please push it on Twitter and elsewhere. This may be a slow news summer. Who knows what some media outlet might pick up on. Remember, those who wish to mock it may do us the most good.
#8 by Yankee Rebel on 05/19/2015 - 8:26 am
I just browsed Bob’s site and I would suggest that someone go over it with spellchecker- unless the misspellings were deliberate. Otherwise, it is looking good!
#9 by Jason on 05/19/2015 - 12:48 pm
LOL! Yeah hit spellcheck if you want to be taken seriously. I don’t find the sloppiness endearing anymore.
#10 by Simmons on 05/18/2015 - 9:06 am
Speaking for millions of whites if I may, I would prefer my FREEDOM from the social scientist whackjobs.
But instead our intellectuals will play mini-Plato and try and build on the internet some perfect white society like its Aryan Sim City.
#11 by Daniel Genseric on 05/18/2015 - 12:45 pm
“You want it? You got it!”
I’m short on ethics, but long on experiments. If you want to be quoted, be QUOTABLE. Raw Story leads the quotes in their story from today with none other than moi:
“However, with every positive reaction comes a negative reaction as Twitter trolls trashed the couple for their support of protesters, calling them “thugs” and “anti-white.”
“#JayZ & #Beyonce are the trash we thought they were, bailing out #antiWhite #THUGS in #baltimoreriot.#tcot #ccot #p2,” wrote @DanielGenseric, whose Twitter page bio claims he is fighting “#whitegenocide.”
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/05/twitter-trolls-rip-jay-z-beyonce-for-bailing-out-baltimore-protestors-they-are-the-trash-we-thought-they-were/
http://danielgenseric.wordpress.com
#12 by Jason on 05/19/2015 - 12:37 pm
How many cases of beer did it take for you to think ‘Europid’ was a great term?
It’s a joke! Relax! Seriously, how much does a DWI cost these days
They say testosterone injections can help you get rid of that effeminate lack of self control
Never understood drunks;
#13 by Bob on 05/18/2015 - 3:34 pm
Way to go, DG!
Sic the bastards, Dan!
#14 by Jason on 05/18/2015 - 7:22 pm
Dan & Bob should share a beer to celebrate! Oh wait, neither of you have the self-control for booze . The men who CAN handle alcohol will do it for you.
I kid! I kid! Relax, just a joke, don’t take yourselves so seriously.
#15 by Jason on 05/19/2015 - 5:27 am
Suggestion: bring Societal Property Rights into the campaign.
Maybe not the whole concept which is probably too much for the public to digest, but at least ask, Why should Whites care about the common good when they are specifically excluded from it?
#16 by Jason on 05/19/2015 - 1:15 pm
The “Coach” model of BUGS is a bad one. Whoever had a coach that didn’t suck? Seriously, think back.
Remember, coaches don’t accomplish anything in the REAL WORLD. They are just playing a silly game.
And it encourages wanna be toadies to imitate their style (especially if they’ve cracked open another bottle of booze.) Hi Dan
#17 by Bob on 05/21/2015 - 4:16 am
Jason, you know very well that as a senior BUGSER you should not make a vague allusion to Societal Property Rights without TRYING it.
#18 by polydoros on 05/21/2015 - 7:25 am
Excellent article, jo3w !
—
Awesome work, Genseric!
—
Laura, I just sent you a new article, “To understand someone’s real character”. And about a week ago I sent you an email about editing one of my other drafts. (Hopefully the emails reached you.) Cheers, poly