B. U. G. S.

HD – Jason can’t start a thread since the membership was recently split into contributors and subscribers.

When anti-whites say “so are you going to move out of America, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa etc…?” do you guys every throw it back at them by saying “So if we did, would you agree that Europe should should be for the preservation and continued existence of White people? Would you agree to give us just Europe?” I have never used this reply as i am unsure if its conceding too much but then again it does put the anti-White on the spot. Thoughts?

PS-Something else i find HYSTERICAL about anti-Whites is how they love to talk about “logic” and how we are “anti-logic” etc….Funny

Have been getting LOTS of positive feedback from pro-Whites at the big site with this one. Apparently the young-uns are getting quite a bit of static in the Universities about “White Privilege.”

EVERYBODY in the Respectable World agrees that there is this thing called White Privilege.

EVERYBODY says that this Privilege can, should, and will be taken away.

EVERYBODY says that there is one way and ONLY one way to solve this problem of White Privilege.

When asked HOW whites are “privileged,” they say we were “BORN that way. We’re white.” Clearly, the solution to the problem of whites being born with White Privilege is to do away with the problem of us being here; to genocide our race. They might sugarcoat their program and say things like “We all bleed red. We’re all one race,” but what they really mean is “On Earth, whites have no place.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they ARE is anti-white.

Anti-racist IS a code word for anti-white.

While the following strategy is debatable and controversial in and of itself, this learning moment cannot go unnoticed. Nothing is TABOO when it comes to saving our people.

With an ever-increasing selection of “a white goes nuts on shooting rampage” stories to pick from, the opportunity to hit our enemy HARD is presenting itself in an ever-increasing fashion. Take Breivik, the Sikh shooter, and even Loughner and The Aurora guy for instance.

The anti-whites reach climax whenever they read about another one of our people shooting up the spot. This is OUR in:

“While what Breivik did is deplorable at best. His unconscionable act doesn’t negate the fact that he reacted in kind to an irrational program taking place in his home country and every white country; to white genocide.

Why is it that anti-whites keep DEMANDING a rational reaction to a program as IRRATIONAL as white genocide?

What is RATIONAL about flooding MILLIONS of non-whites into EVERY white country and ONLY white countries?

What is RATIONAL about then advertising, promoting, and systematically brainwashing children to PREFER non-white partners over those of their own race?

What is RATIONAL about calling them names like “nazi” and “Racist” if they do not.

Anti-whites INSIST on rational reactions under imposed IRRATIONAL conditions. You SCREAM that you are anti-racist while you keep stoking the fire. What you truly are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

[Enter crickets]

I need some feedback on this! I’m in the mainstream so little that I’m beginning to lose my ear for some things. Is there anything in this post that hits you the wrong way, and then right after it I’ll tell you what in it concerns me:

Africa is not being flooded with non-Africans and Africans forced by law to integrate with the non-Africans so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.

Asia is not being flooded with non-Asians and Asians forced by law to integrate with the non-Asians so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.

ONLY white countries, and ALL white countries, are being flooded with non-whites, and whites forced by law to integrate with the non-whites so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.

That’s genocide under U.N. definition.

The people carrying out this program of genocide say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

What concerns me is the word “integrate.” Is that one of the anti-white holy words, like Jew, Holocaust, Nazi, racist, etc. whose sudden appearance throws the mind of the audience into another universe?

I’m on the fence about this…I’d hate to give up that Mantra, but….

“integrate” is a superfluous term. Also, “blending…..”

Whites aren’t something you put on Frappe in a blender. Avoid this nonsensical BS at all costs.

Should read something like “Assimilated (i.e. intermarry) with all those non-whites until we are no more. That is GENOCIDE.”

The SF Brain Trust, or is that train bust, is at it again…

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t913275/#post10589908

That yep-nope yum-yuk is lucky I am banned.

By the way, Genseric did some German translations of the Mantra.  Are there any Russian versions?  Or Ukrainian? These are huge pockets of White people.  If there are no official translations, maybe I can use the google translator – it will be rough but might get the point across.

haha!

Toughen up.

“integrate” is a superfluous term. Also, “blending…..”

Whites aren’t something you put on Frappe in a blender. Avoid this nonsensical BS at all costs.

Should read something like “Assimilated (i.e. intermarry) with all those non-whites until we are no more. That is GENOCIDE.”

The above quotation was my reply to you. Please point to the terms above that are “too goddamned harsh.” What happened to “avuncular?”

Are simple inquiries above your pay grade?

I am asking you an simple and honest question. WHICH part of what I wrote is offensive to you? You are a “tough” nut to crack, Harumpy. You ask for feedback. Next, you don’t hear something along the lines of “Geewillickers, Batman! That is the best mini I have ever read!” and you go nutso.

And then I need to stay away from the guy who is afraid of “the r-word?” Doh-kay…