B. U. G. S.

I was just about to post “The Onion” as well. I think for a parody site, it will do a lot to help spread the message. I almost thought one of our guys must have written it for them!

You must focus on the intention, not the likely result.

Do you let someone trying to kill you off the hook for attempted murder, because their plot maybe won’t have worked to completion?

They tried, thats the point.

The point is, there is deliberate policy to undermine a race or identifiable group of people by making them a minority and assimilating them out.

Assimilation is the endgame. They will not accept a white minority who doesn’t assimilate.

Will anti-white stop persecuting “racists” and whites (which to them is the same) when we are a minority? Well they then say “You know, we’ve gone too far, we can stop non-white immigration now?” Will they say to someone who is against interracial marriage “You know, given that you are a minority, thats OK to suggest that whites should marry other whites”.

Will they ever say “You know, it’s gone far enough”

No, they won’t. We know they won’t, a few will see its gone too far, and defect, but the hardcore anti-whites won’t. So why give them the benefit of the doubt?

If whites are going to defect, then we must demand it now. No neutrality on this issue can be tolerated.

Assimilation of white people out of existence is the logical conclusion of what they advocate. It is the logical conclusion of having mass immigration which cannot be opposed of even criticised or recommended against, and racial assimilation, which cannot be opposed, or criticised, or even recommended against.

Play it to the end, its genocide, the eradication of an identifiable group of people. They know this is the endgame. They’ve talked about the coffee coloured new race. They’ve openly said whites must go.

If they wan’t to push it, then call it for what it is.

I know it can sound crazy to talk about “Genocide”, it sound fringe. But thats because of the insanity of what THEY are pushing.

We don’t say Genocide because we are far our fringe dwellers. We say it because it is the brutal reality. It is they who are that crazy.

Yes, they really are advocating blended out of existence, not just ‘minority’.

What do you mean “What is a white person”?

Anti-whites constantly talk about white privilege!

Anti-whites talk up ‘mixed race’ marriages.

Anti-whites object to “white” people saying we should only marry each other.

Anti-whites talk about white people needing to mix with other races to diversify the gene pool.

Anti-whites like Tim Wise talk about the “end” of White people, and his audience don’t question who he is referring to.

Anti-whites talk about towns, cities, nations, TV shows and weddings as being “too white”.

Anti-whites talk about how when whites are mixed out, there will be no more racism.

In EVERY CASE, the anti-white can judge who belongs to the White “social construct”, by SIGHT. In EVERY CASE, when anti-whites are talking to anti-whites, they know whom they are referring to.

Yet they turn around and ask “what is white”?

You have been using this term all this time, based on someones heritage, hearing this term from anti-whites, without question, and now you claim you don’t know, can’t define it?

I don’t believe you!

Hi guys and girls.

The line below popped into my head while writing a comment. Perhaps it needs some tweaking, but it makes a point, which at least to me, says something.

Political Correctness has gone from shaping and removing our attitudes, if it ever was about that, to shaping and removing our race.

There are some of us who don’t necessarily report here, who still work the mantra into general discussion, promote it in articles, push it to others.

As the mantra spreads, a smaller and smaller proportion of people using it will be core BUGSERS. I see it working its way, slowly, into the mainstream. I see nationalist groups picking it up. I see people on discussion panels using mantra-like arguments.

I can start to see how it is true that the people who originally pushed it, will be forgotten when it becomes a steamroller.

A point that must be made, is that there is no alternative offered to end “white privilege” that doesn’t result in Genocide.

Whites who are accused of gaining from privilege include children, who have done nothing.  They have ‘privilege’ BECAUSE they are white. Note the lack of any way in which white can clear themselves of it.  They either must non-exist, or be in a perpetual state of submissiveness (submissiveness to assimilation included).

No anti-white posits a ‘final solution’ to the privilege problem.  No anti-white outlines criteria which can be met, where whites no longer are accused of ‘privelege’.

None that don’t involve genocide.  In the Straight Dope thread, as I have previously on SF, I asked AGAIN and AGAIN for a position from them which did not result in white Genocide, and got nothing.  I asked for a white country which could be exempt, where anti-racists would not get upset if it maintained its whiteness, and got nothing.  One muppet tried to say Turkey was an example!

Daniel Genseric‘s post nails it I think.  I would think the sentence

When asked HOW whites are “privileged,” they say we were “BORN that way. We’re white.”

could be altered to read

Those who say that whites are privileged, offer no solution to the Privilege problem which does not involve genocide of whites.

What do you think?

Best to keep EXACTLY to the mantra theme, but slightly alter the words.

So “Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans, White countries for everyone” can become “Why is it that Asia is for the Asians, Africa is for the Africans, but white countries must be for everyone?”

The simple addition if the word “is”, will confuse the filter.  But the message is the same.