NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

That reminds me of the time I worked as a teacher in a school of mainly Indian/Pakistani kids in London. The girls, like all young girls, liked to draw pictures of fairies/princesses/supermodels/angels, etc.

Every one of them had blond hair and blue eyes!

Comment by richard

ME:

Remember, we are fighting GENOCIDE here. Designer babies do not have to be ALL Aryan. But in this society, there will be plenty of those who decide to have one or more ARYAN offspring. I personally don’t believe there will be many people who will choose to have ugly mixed-looking offspring.

If you want to know the percentage of people who will choose offspring as brown as themselves, look at the number of rich black men (those with a CHOICE) who marry women darker than themselves.

And remember, that Politically Correct choice will not be admired by those ugly kids when they themselves have to look for DATES.

Again:

The OJ Simpson type 0f black would not THINK of dating a girl who looked like his own daughter.

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

The only dumb question is the one you fail to ask, this is an old line my college professors would use in class. We expect to be punished if we do not answer the question correctly and this is the problem most of us face in here. We are not being asked trick questions, Bob I think is trying to open our minds up to objective and clear thinking. I once commented to Bob, I think I see the light but I can’t seem to bring it all together, well maybe I am afraid because the master might scold me for giving the wrong answer. What I will do is speak from the heart and put it forth as I see it in relation to what I have learned in here, it’s the best I can do.

Comment by Alan — 1/20/2007 @ 5:06 am | Edit This

Not Spam
Not Spam

Thank you for the compliment. I do appreciate it. Shari

ME:

Shari, when I give a compliment I mean it. If do not weigh them first like a good PR man.

But it is good to value my compliments, because when you do say something I think is wrong I will criticize WHAT YOU SAY with the same mentality.

The main reason you put something HERE is to get MY judgment on it. What you get is MY judgment, and mark this carefully, on *** IT ***. As Alan says, I am not here to judge YOU. The less of that judgment on the crapola section of what you SAY that you consider a judgment on YOU, the more you will get out of this.

I am NOT saying your mother is ugly.

The fact is that learning the lessons I have to teach is extremely hard concentration on its own. We DO NOT need this distraction.

Now, face this fact:

MANY TIMEWS WHEN I SEE WHAT I SEE AS AN ERROR IT WILL REMIND ME OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE PISSED ME OFF ALL MY LIFE.

You had BETTER see the chance of direction when I start ruminating on how what I don’t like about your comment REMINDS me of an error fostered by the enemy. If you DON’T, then you are going to assume I am regarding YOU as the enemy. This goes right back to what Alan said, you have been trained to the idea that, if you have any idea that is not Politically Correct, your teacher will treat YOU as an enemy.

A lifetime’s training is not easy to get over, so Alan’s point is CRUCIAL here: YOU ARE NOT IN MOMMY PROFESSOR’S WORLD HERE.

Bob’s Blog is for adults.

And there are precious few of us left.

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

Bob, I think your forgetting one very important motivation – the instinct to want to pass one’s own genes and traits onto the next generation. That’s why adoption is normally a last resort alternative to conceiving a couples biological child.

If the designer baby movement has any chance of overcoming that, it would be merely some gene therapy on ones own progeny to correct some defects, or perhaps by some process to select only the choicest genes from one’s own body (as in the movie Gatteca when the Doctor (to paraphrase) explains that, “He’ll still be you, only he’ll be the best of you.”).

Bruce

ME:

Bruce, you are still thinking in terms of NORMAL motivations. If we had NORMAL motivations there would be no racial intermarriage.

I think YOU are forgetting one important motivation. The black man who says on television that he doesnot date black women is not after more copies of himself. The Indian cosmetics industry puts out huge amounts of skin whitening products and advertises them as such.

I remember watching an Italian movie that showed a south Italian being envied by others, he had the ideal. He had a blond wife and THEIR daughter was a blond. Again and again I have heard some guy who married a brown say, “I hope our child is blond like my sister.”

Once again, what goes ar4ound comes around. The anti-whites are inthe midst of a massive campaign to assure everybody that adoption is the SAME as real children. Gays and lesbians and anti-whties are united on this. Interracial adoptions are based on it. And the whole anti-white campaign of assimilation is based onit.

Had you noticed?

Now let me in on a little secret of life: The people that any campaign makes believers of are the people on their side. It is THEY who are being convinced that adoption is better than crowding the world up with children of one’s own. When designer children come in, that will snap back on them like a rubber band.

Parents USED to want children who looked like them. That WOULD have been a major block to designer children. The campaign for designer chilren has already been begun.

BY THEM.

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

It was Martin Dies Jr. who started the HUAC if I’m not mistaken.

Bruce

ME:

That is the impression you would get from Goggle. But Dies took over HUAC and MADE it anti-Communist AFTER World War II. During the Roosevelt years, there were more Communists than anti-Communists among congressional Democrats. Southerners became a very small minority of Democrats after the 1932 landslide, and those Northern Democrats were FAR left.

Dies may have named it HUAC for all I know or can easily find out. The original committee and its purpose are simply un Googleable, at least for me.

I got the real story from a chance mainline documentary shortly before the KGB files were closed again. But, like the Medicogenetical Institute, it has gone into the Memory Hole.

But it WAS a Communist New York Jew who set up the originial committee to chase German sympathizers and Klansmen, and Communists were on that committee.

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

Hitler-style ‘designer’ babies coming under fire in Texas

Medical group says breeding for traits will lead to death for those who fail

A Texas fertility clinic now promoting its plan to “design” babies for customers is moving society another step down the road toward full-blown eugenics in the United States, where there would be certain categories of lives that simply would be valueless, according to a spokesman for an organization of physicians.

“I hope we have the gumption to have laws passed that will prohibit this,” Dr. Gene Rudd, the associate executive director for the Christian Medical Association, told WND. “But one we’ve gone so far, how can you justify not going just a little bit further … down that ethical abyss.”

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53680

Comment by richard

ME:

Only Hitler seems to have wanted children to be smart and pretty. KIDS don’t want to be smart and pretty, do they?

I don’t think the “Christians” will do as much harm here as they did in their fully-scale campaign against smallpox vaccination around 1800. But they’ll try. And the medical establishment’s Galen bit, some professors hung onto it, was with the preachers then.

So every university Ethics Department will say that only Hitler would support this. No, gang, this alliance is NOT new.

Not Spam
Not Spam

This blog is fascinating and I think about it a lot. But, I wonder if you don’t also despise us who are white, but not brilliant, as “cute Amish.” Shari

ME:

This is another of the million examples of taking offense where none was intended. I say something about life in Pompeii before the volcano, and somebody looks offended and says, “So what you mean is that my mother is ugly.” He or she then goes into a detailed discussion about how, if you really wanted to, and I mean DESPERATELY, you could take what I said as, if I had motivations I hadn’t dreamed of, would show how SUBTLY, since I’m smart and probably being subtle, be taken as a reference to his mother’s lack of pulchritude.

As you can imagine, this sort of thing is AWFULLY hard to deal with. It’s like a slap in the face. No, I did not have this person, much less his MOTHER, in mind. I thought what I said was pretty clear in itself. I don’t think anyone here who has been subject to my criticism — ask Al Parker — thinks of me as SUBTLE.

Today the term used is “designer children,” and it is considered to be a horror by the “Christians” and by the Politically Correct Ethics Departments of all universities. Once again, you have this alliance of “Christians” and Political Correctness against the future.

I have seen tracts by “intellectuals” attacking the germ theory of disease in the old days the same way. I saw sermons denouncing vaccinating, based on the germ theory. I dare any of you to go to a doctor today who does not subscribe to the germ theory of disease. When it HAPPENS, it is simply a practical step based on reality.

So I said that a person in the year 2100 who CHOOSES to have children with random genes will be regarded as “cute Amish.” Thais, he will have ugly, dumb offspring, who will probably NOT regard that choice as “cute.” But then again, circumcision was treated as “cute” on the Seinfeld Show. You can do anything you want to a baby.

I don’t think Amish children resent their upbringing, even when they choose the modern world. As I SAID, their parents can be pacifists because they have us here to protect them. They can choose not to have vaccinations because everybody else does, so the diseases are not a threat. They can NOT choose to send their children to school through the eighth grade only, as they wish, because that is not allowed by the established religion of this country. Even “cute,” “pet” people, which is what the Amish are, are allowed to defy The One True American Faith.

These are god points. These are IMPORTANT points.

So I make them and Shari says I am insulting her.

WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!?????????

I am talking about people half to a century from now who will make a particular. I would be very happy to learn that Shari is indeed contacting us fro the future, because I would have a lot of questions for her if she is. But for the moment I will go on the assumption that Shari is also living in the year 2007. Shari can no more decide not to have designer children (her age will not then be a factor) than the Amish could have decided not to own an automobile in the year 1850.

And, Shari, for the twentieth time, it is YOU who keep saying you’re not bright, and Ole Bob is the one who KEEPS saying he wishes you would STOP that. It implies that ***I*** tolerate dumbies. You are here and quoted because ***I*** clear your comments and ***I*** quote your approach and ***I*** would tell you if I thought they were not bright.

Shari, your mother is NOT ugly and you are NOT dumb. If you had nothing to say I wouldn’t quote you, and that puts you in a vanishing small percentage of the present population.

STOP IT! If you keep putting yourself down, you are going to give the impression that the women here are considered stupid. If you do that, I am going to send Elizabeth after you.

If you really tick HER off, you’re going to find that the female of the species is not only deadlier than the male but if she really gets going, she makes us look like wimps.

Beware!

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

What makes me worried is how did these people die out? India, China, South America, the list goes on. Early Aryans seem to have conquered the world then thrown it all away, much like we have the last century.

Is there something in our psyches that makes us stop short of a ‘final solution’ to the demographic timebomb?

I assume there was no jewish conspiracy before the flood!

Comment by richard

ME:

As every documentary on the white mummies in China ecstatically points out, they didn’t DIE out. The solution to the white problem then was the same as it is now. If the small population of whites who give a society the wheel and everything else gets mixed into the mass, there is no further progress:

” Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

http://whitakeronline.org

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

That hydrocarbon energy is limitless or if it reaches its limits that technology will replace good old fashioned crude and gas. This thought then chains in with other assumptions of economic growth and other nostrums of progress. You chided me on Peak Oil commentary saying it was both wrong and off topic with your “basics” approach, but what I tried to add was that cheap energy is the crux of the modern welfare empire we have.

Comment by Simmons

ME:

Is “peak oil” a point or a process? The word “peak” seems to indicate a point. But what will happen is that AS oil runs out other, marketable energy alternatives will develop.

“Nothing concentrates the mind like realization that one will be hanged at dawn.” By the same token, you are dead right that the crap preached today is entirely the result of the opposite of being hanged at dawn. Al Parker would never have hinted that there is no sociopath race if he had to talk down streets in the ghetto every night.

My disagreement here is racial. A white society can adapt to anything. A white society will always advance. So this doctrine of progress works until a society’s SKIN turns BROWN.

A lot of people insist that we are going through an unprecedented period of change. But look at the generation that came up from 1830 to 1860. Since the horse had become the basic unit of transportation “somewhere among the Scythians”,” for thousands of years, the horse was the best and basic land transportation. It is hard to even begin to conceive what a change the RAILROAD was.

In battle, a major proportion of the effort had to go to messengers and outdated information. The 1860 Pony Express was the latest technology in terms of the year 1830. Then came the telegraph. You could message California in the time it took for your voice waves to reach across the room.

I think cheap oil is holding us BACK. As it really disappears, all the drivel about wind and solar energy will die out. We don’t want energy that bureaucrats can develop. We want energy we can USE.

You said, “This thought then (chimes) in with other assumptions of economic growth and other nostrums of progress.” So who in the hell let’s ME make a general statement like this? This ain’t poetry man, this is WAR. I know writing is work, b believe me, but why don’t you go on and TELL us what you mean by that? And stop bitching that I called you down. You and everybody else has to get over the idea that what I say is the last word. If you have a theory, SAY IT! You know damned well I will publish it if it’s not too many words.

I reserve the right to give you hell.

SO WHAT?

So I can practice what I just preached, now let me expand on what I said about cheap oil has held us back. The Jane Fondas are taken seriously because we have cheap oil. Money for solar energy is used by people to drive to meetings in the latest cars. Nobody invests real money in alternative energy because we ALL know it’s hare-brained Yuppie crap.

Nothing makes the brain into a feather like something as absurd as lakes of cheap oil. In Reagan’s day, the same Massachusetts delegation that was fighting nuclear power was also screaming against Reagan’s DEREGULATING oil prices. Because the price of oil was kept artificially low, FOR TWO GENERATIONS, to take Southern resources for the Northeast without paying the market price, New England was able to fight nuclear power.

Yes, everybody I know has totally forgotten that the price of oil was set by Federal regulators until Reagan took office.

If oil had come from the Northeast instead of the South, that would not have happened. More important, if the price of oil had been left up to the South, New England would have been a hotbed of PRACTICAL research for PRACTICAL energy alternatives.

Because it owned the Union government, New England did not NEED energy alternatives. That left the field wide for Harvard and the Boston Globe to concentrate on attacking nuclear power.

Please note that Massachusetts had precious few Reagan voter by 1980, when both Carter and Anderson got a healthy share of the vote there. But in 1984 Reagan carried the state solidly by a clear majority. Among other things, with oil price deregulation, Massachusetts had to LIVE with what it advocated.

Theoretical crises help the other side expand on its nonsense. REAL crises work in OUR favor.

I don’t really believe in the global warming/cooling that they say requires that bureaucrats run the economy worldwide, but I wish it WERE true. It would concentrate our minds miraculously if the danger were real, and serious people, not the Al Gores, would deal with it. When the ideological horseshit is abandoned, the problem gets solved.

But while we have cheap oil and no immediate problem, for example, the only people who notice are in the bullshit brigade.

Nobody remembers the banes of the South like railroad rates and government-set oil prices. No one remembers 2YK. But the Al Gores were shrieking and pointing to the end of the world on January 1, 2000. As usual, once serious people saw it as a problem, it was fixed.

Let’s go back to my earlier point to show the crap analogy may be literal. If anyone in 1830 thought about the present New York City population of 20,000 per acre, living at their present standard, he would be a Practical Man: “At such a high living standard there would several horses per capital. How could you possibly get the horse dung produced by ten million horses out of the city, as well as the horse dung produced by the removers?”

So, “How can we have a higher living standard if the price of oil goes up?” Because we replaced the dung-makers and we will replace the oil producers. And, of course, a major part of our cheap oil goes into tires and other parts we do not pay attention to in our obsession with oil.

If there WERE a major world crisis, the people surviving it would be white. But until the problem gets up close and personal, the myth-makers OWN it.

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

Speaking of mummies some archeologists have recently found a 2000 year old mummy in Monglolia and he has blond hair. I have seen the pictures that Spiegel posted. Some profs in Germany are studying him now and of course in a matter of weeks it will be found out he was anti-semitic and life should be centered on endless discussions of the Old Testament and its wonderful people.

Comment by Simmons

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

What exactly are you saying Bob, I have a hunch, but I am sure like usual it’s probably wrong. The only picture I see is this, the entire establishment and all the sub units all operate like a religion. They all have a god, a hierarchy, a holy bible, priests and a loyal congregation. The entire world runs on worshiping something and will fight like hell to protect this something. Establishments survive by refusing to admit failure, they twist reality or slowly conform to a new twist of fate. My guess is, evolution of truth and knowledge is retarded by the bias and fear establishments have for anything that may dethrone their gods, what else would they do.

Comment by Alan

ME:

You have made an excellent statement here, to the point and covering a huge amount of territory. It deserves that people do what I am doing, chew it over.

Good stuff. I await a book from this outline.

AND you made me think of restating what I have said before. You are NOT supposed to put in, a la Shari, those apologetic first sentences that say you are merely repeating the Master’s words. You are picking up the ball and going with it.

It is not really flattering to a person who has made his living for decades as a professional writer, “What exactly are you saying?” But I understand what you are getting at. But remember you aren’t asking me what BOB is getting at. You are asking me how YOU should understand what I say.

Like all of us, I have spent a major of my life teaching myself things. To do that, I have to take a text and state the proposition in a way that makes sense to me. The original writer of the average calculus textbook would be baffled by the way I stated his proposition to myself to make sense of it. He is used to statements like “Let us make six assumption, now let y approach v as t is held constant where 1),2),3)…”, and so forth.

This is not MY language, so I translate it into MY terms. Is he trying to say, as I do, “I am trying to estimate the rate of change of brick relative to clay. I need a way to do it. I know that while the calculations trail away, they are constant, so I can get on the other end and see how it comes out. Now how will I do that?”

This is NOT what the mathematics textbook is “trying to say.” It IS what BOB needs from it.

So you see Pain busily building around my structure. If he says anything I think is wrong I will point it out in my usual diplomatic fashion: “Pain, you silly ass …” and so forth. But Pain is NOT saying what I am TRYING to say. He is going ahead of me. If not AHEAD, at least applying what I made him think of in new areas.

That is the fundamental difference between this seminar and the college professors you have been enslaved by for so long. There is no Whitakerism here. You are not graded on meticulously repeating what I am trying to say. I am talking and following a line of thought.

The dead ends are when someone says, “So what you are trying to say is that IQ is the measure of EVERYTHING.” Or, “You are in the area of Gobdooble’s 1905 book when you say…”

The subject is always comparison of blacks to whites, an easier task. What is the place for East Asians in your Weltanschauung? Their IQs are close to whites but they are not as creative.

Maybe you ought to give us a required reading list or something so we can understand this way of thinking and this world view, to help us FEEL what it was back then.

-al parker

ME:

There is no reading list outside of WOL for this.

As soon as we won the long, lone battle to show that all races have not “been proven by modern anthropology to be equal in inherited abilities” the obsession with IQ went ballistic. I have written piece after piece after piece, after piece after piece after piece about it RIGHT HERE, and you didn’t see ONE of them. More likely, like everybody else, you saw them and blanked them out.

Gasp! Let me repeat it AGAIN: Without white people, humanity will be a very large ant colony FOREVER. Your blacks will deteriorate, your East Asians will stagnate. ALL groups have a right to survival, so this is not needed as an argument for our right to survive. But all groups do not have an EQUAL right to survive, any more than, in your belief system, every animal has as much right to survive as mankind does.

If all men are created equal, then I am dehumanizing other races. You make the rules, so you have to judge them accordingly. “Blacks deteriorate, Orientals stagnate, whites CREATE.” I can’t see how you missed that, but most people do. In THAT sense whites are what might say that I call the only humans.

It’s just TRUE. If you can’t live with it, you can join the 21st century version of the Amish, but don’t act like you can’t understand it. Even the Amish don’t deny they understand gasoline engines.

You will see this IQ obsession in Stormfront. And no matter how often I explain the creativity side, to quote Kipling,

“The bitch returns to her vomit,
The hog returns to her mire
And the burnt fool’s bandaged finger
Goes wabbling back to the fire.”

I hope you are not a fool. I hope you will say you understand, you simply want to be New Amish. I am not sure I want you to get off this kick. It sure gets me down to basics.

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

The more I read here, the less I understand.

I had always assumed we consider people of other races to be at least fellow humans. I thought calling non-whites subhumans were comments made out of anger and frustration. I knew IQ differences were significant, but I didn’t think of something so radical as considering different races different animals. Animals that might be psychopathic or not have a “self” as we know it.

The subject is always comparison of blacks to whites, an easier task. What is the place for East Asians in your Weltanschauung? Their IQs are close to whites but they are not as creative.

Maybe you ought to give us a required reading list or something so we can understand this way of thinking and this world view, to help us FEEL what it was back then.

-al parker

Comment by YearningForFreedom

ME:

That old “I don’t understand” line has been used to death as the ONLY answer antis ever had for the Mantra.

I don’t think you are doing it for that reason, but what you are trying to say politely is that you don’t agree with me. You are a good sport and you can take whatever I dish out, and that drives me nuts. It is much easier to deal with nasty people I disagree with than with a good guy.

I am JOKING, dammit!

Al, YFF, what you are facing RIGHT NOW is going to be the STORY of the coming century. Everything we assumed has to be reexamined, and it is going to HURT. In 1600 we had a nice, comfortable, complete and ancient view of the universe that was OURS, that we were loyal to, that had a beginning, a present, and an end. The earth was created in February, 4004, all people ended up in Heaven or Hell, the earth was the center of the universe.

In 1700 we had a medical system based on knowledge 0of Greek and Latin, on Galen. It was a completely human-centered system which showed that all disease was related to psychology, an idea we think was invented recently. There were physical humors in the body, but word humor was still psychological. They were balanced by bleeding, and they did not exist in mere animals.

Pace Pain, there was no dooky, no filthy little germs, no connection to the animal world.

It was a fine system that met all our psychological needs.

It just didn’t cure anything.

The assumptions you list are what our society is based on. It is exactly like the Humor Theory and a geocentric universe. It was invented to make us feel good because we had no other answers, so we naturally settled for the one that suited us best. Now we are running into serious knowledge about the human brain, DNA, carbon dating, and this stuff has as much relevance in the new century as bleeding for pneumonia does in a modern hospital.

If anyone had a memory, this would be routine. We went through it with Galileo, we went through it with a lesser-known hero Semmelweis, we went through it with the germ theory of disease, we went through it as astrology turned into astronomy. Over and over and over we have dealt with this same thing. The professors and priests were on one side and reality was on the other.

I should be dealing with people who are capable of saying, “OK, now we are actually learning something about the social sciences, so it is time to drop Political Correctness in the universities and the convenient theories in the churches and get real, AGAIN,” But we’re right back to shrieks from preachers about how this makes us nonhumanunsouls and social scientists who constitute, once again, a solid roadblock.

It is a NEW age, and the new age is exactly the one in which you are listing your assumptions. The one thing you should learn from me is that in a time like this if you can list your assumptions then you had better get over them.

ALL men are NOT more intelligent than ALL obobos or chimpanzees, but we have developed a convenient morality that says that they are. It is convenient, not TRUE. Loose and sloppy thinking like that is fine if you don’t know enough to think straight about a subject. In 1200 AD geocentrism was as good as anything else.

But in the new century, whatever “we” believed about “humanity” is no longer relevant. No, it is DESTRUCTIVE. In fifty years I might morally prefer a good dog with all his loyalty and an artificial frontal lobe to the average human. I may make that frontal modem permanent and prefer him to most humans.

Nobody has any trouble with the idea that races must be equal because their IQ overlaps. But animals are animals even though their intelligence overlaps at the extremes. A gorilla is capable of sign language. The average gorilla is far more intelligent than the whole legal category of humans calls idiots and he is certainly, literally infinitely, more intelligent than a fertilized embryo that just went “SHAZAM! BOOM!”

Bleeding to treat pneumonia is GONE. Vanished. Nil. One over n as n REACHES infinity. Nada. Nichts.

Geocentrism is GONE. Vanished. Nil. One over n as n reaches infinity. Nada. Nichts.

And in the new century, what you assume “we” think is GONE. Vanished. Nil. One over n as n reaches infinity. Nada. Nichts.

I still have to speak in those terms. Language cannot keep up with such changes. I still speak of THE earth, though I am aware that definition may apply to other planets. But I am not denying that other planets exist. I am speaking to be understood.

You are confused because you are one of a tiny group that is already being hit with the twenty-first century. A bit of confusion is certainly in order. In a couple of decades this will go from confusion to REALLY hitting the fan. But by then, if this seminar works, we’ll be on the next steps.

Commenters take it for granted that the Black Sea Valley will be studied more. The Caucasian mummies in China have NOT been studied more. They are in the Memory Hole. As one astronaut said, “I always hoped I might be the FIRST man on the moon. It never occurred to me that I would be the LAST.”

Here is where my memory comes in. You don’t realize how many things get completely ignored because, well, they are completely ignored. There is nobody to remind you of them, and most people write about the latest news release.

From what I can see, the last exploration there was in 2001, by the same man who did the earlier one. He was disappointed that they found wood from trees instead of houses when they sent hooks away down there. Actually, if you dropped a hook into modern France, which is smaller and far more crowded than the Black Sea Valley was, you would come up almost entirely with trees unless you happened to hit on an urban area.

And there it stopped. “Christians” don’t want any exploration there. Liberals do not want to risk finding the Urheimat of the Indo-European race they have persuaded everybody to forget about. They want to talk about how the Nubians built Egypt while Northern Europeans grunted and waited to learn how to use the opposable thumb.

Without my kind of memory, maybe you cannot really see how critical the Manufacture of Information is. Anything that is not in the newspaper in the last month is FORGOTTEN. We have a better Memory Hole than Orwell did.

Whole areas of study, involving tens of billions of dollars, from theology to social science, are invested entirely in the Garbage Dump Theory of History. Who is going to defy all that and finance the huge project it would be to get down under all that fresh and sea water?

The truth will eventually out, but that is because, as I pointed in my forgotten summation to A Plague on Both Your Houses, the whole social science establishment is facing an embryonic NEXT establishment. Carbon dating and frontal lobes and a lot of other things want money, and another study of how blacks suffer or the Holocaust is taking it. I can see signs of this frustration now, but I could not explain it in the time I want to devote to it.

Black Sea History will be an afterthought, and it won’t come from history or archeology. Advancing science in fifty years will let us read the Black Sea bed very clearly.

That is why I hesitate to make predictions. I know where things are going but I am weary, weary unto DEATH of guiding people back into rational thought. Most of the people I deal with are like bowling beginners; the ball hits the floor and, at slightly different distances, goes over into the gutter.

But I see the basics spreading. That is the only point that matters. When it hits the headlines, some people will ready to absorb it.

Besides, I would have to repeat it eery two weeks and I don’t want to bother.