When I put the article below, “Pro-Life Versus Pro-White,” I found to my horror that some of the pro-choice people LIKED what I wrote.
I can’t have that. Nobody walks away from Bob Whitaker without being offended.
So I made up for that by writing the following diatribe:
Now that I offended one group, let me offend the other.
I hold anyone at a distance who puts any issue on the same level as saving my race. That includes fanatical pro-choicers as well as fanatical pro-lifers.
Before Roe versus Wade, I had the same problem with fanatical capitalists.
The Wall Street Journal is more dedicated to the destruction of the white race than any other major publication in America, left or right. For them cheap labor is more important than anything else.
I was a professor of economics. I am very much pro-free market. But this is not in the same category with saving my RACE.
I worked with conservatives and with pro-lifers on Capitol Hill when we were both battling anti-white leftism. But the second their pro-life or pro-capitalist ideas took precedence over saving my race, I dropped them like a hot rock.
Such people can be ALLIES, but never COMRADES.
In the case of Russia I am as fanatically and rabidly anti-abortion as anyone who thinks he owns God. But when it comes to a white girl who has been raped by a black man, I would personally drive her to the abortion clinic and if I could, I would perform the abortion myself.
An abortionist who destroys white children is my enemy. I have probably helped prevent more of those than anybody else on Stormfront, including those who own God.
My webmaster has referred to me as “an equal opportunity offender.”
Let me say this one more time. If you still refuse to understand it, I simply do not suffer fools:
My RACE is being destroyed. My sole interest at this moment is the saving of my RACE, and the rest of your issues can go to hell.
#1 by Bedford on 11/01/2004 - 7:21 pm
I have always stayed out of the pro-life – pro-choice debate. I have saved myself a lot wear and tear and time:-). Abortion cannot be stopped by law as demonstrated by the illegal drug trade. Johnny Gardener is an antiabortion activist in Columbia S. C. Bob should only have such a zealot in support of saving the white race!
#2 by Bob Whitaker on 11/01/2004 - 8:04 pm
If you’re working on Capitol Hill it’s a little hard to stay out the abortion debate.
Yes, there are many zealots on abortion and other issues I wish would help me make this a world into which a child would WANT to be born.
But the Golden Rule is in the NEW Testament, and Jehovists pay little attention to that.
#3 by Don on 11/01/2004 - 10:09 pm
I had a remarkable experience last night which I would like to relate here.
While standing out in the yard alone, I noticed a light approaching which got brighter and brighter. Finally it became too bright for me to look at.
And then a voice spoke to me and said: “Don, my son”
I said: “Yes Lord”
And God said: “Have you heard the words of my prophets?”
And I replied: “What prophets, Lord?”
And God spoke to me and said: “David Duke, Robert Whitaker, Don Black, Sam Dickson”
And I said: “I have heard them, Lord”
And God said: “Have you heeded their message?”
And I said: “I have tried, Lord”
Then God spoke to me and said: “This is what you must do. Instruct thy son to hew upon a tablet the words of my Commandment: “Thou shalt go forth and save the White Race.” Then the light went away and God spoke no more.
I went back into the house, weak to be sure. In the morning I told my son all the words that God had spoken unto me. He said: “It is good. I will hew The Commandment upon a tablet.” And these are the words he must hew: “Thou shalt go forth and save the White Race.”
Thus I heard the voice of God and I have obeyed.
#4 by Joe R. on 11/02/2004 - 1:11 am
LOL You know, the New Orleans Unity meeting was what propelled me back into this thing. Being in California, you can imagine the frustration. However, on the positive side, closet-bigot liberals are really beginning to find that it’s getting harder for them to “hide.” In general, they’re learning that the finer points of their “culture” are often not very well-received by the “newcomers.” The non-whites will accept all the social programs and all, but that’s usually the extent of it. But getting back to the original point, the survival of the only race which can get to the stars, is a hundred times more important than the next most important issue. Although Globalism, UN, education, outsourcing, etc. are issues which are merely part of the big issue.
#5 by Don on 11/02/2004 - 7:27 am
In order to offend me you will need to besmirch the character of Robert E. Lee and praise Franklin Roosevelt to the High Heavens at the same time.
#6 by Bob Whitaker on 11/02/2004 - 8:27 am
OK.
Robert E. Lee, as he later confessed, should not have given Grant a gentlemanly surrender at Appomattox. He should have gone into guerilla warfare as the brigadier general from South Carolina recommended.
In April of 1945, Franklin Delano Roosevelt did America a wonderful favor.
He died.
#7 by Don on 11/02/2004 - 11:11 am
You’ll need to do a whole lot better than that, Bob.
Undoubtedly not Lee’s only mistake in judgement. It would be nice if good character and good judgement always coincided, but, alas, we know this is not always the case.
If Franklin Roosevelt had committed suicide in 1925, I would be more forgiving.
#8 by H.S. on 11/02/2004 - 12:36 pm
Re: Robert E. Lee: your restraint shocks even me — the ole instincts must have kicked in.
#9 by Brian on 11/02/2004 - 1:16 pm
Guys,
Bob is absolutely right here – period. If you understand the English language you should understand the difference between allies and Comrades.
Brian
#10 by Bob Whitaker on 11/02/2004 - 2:43 pm
Don and HS,
I did the best I could to offend Don. He just didn’t give me much to work with.
#11 by Don on 11/03/2004 - 2:26 am
RE: But when it comes to a white girl who has been raped by a black man, I would personally drive her to the abortion clinic and if I could, I would perform the abortion myself.
I would help you.
As I said before, there are problems and there are solutions.
It helps to know which is which.
#12 by Don on 11/03/2004 - 11:43 am
Besides, God spoke to me again and said: “Son, do not be offended by my servant Robert Whitaker. He speaks the truth and does not curry favor with any man.”
#13 by Richard L. Hardison on 11/04/2004 - 1:08 pm
The statement, “Such people can be ALLIES, but never COMRADES” is not true as such people can’t be even allies. The US and Brits were allies, but the Soviet Union was a cobelligerent. The philosophies and agenda was completely different. It took a bit before the US realized the Soviet Union was actually an enemy. Such are those who place anythibng above the survival of the race. We may be able to use their help on occasion, but they are never our friends.
#14 by Brian on 11/04/2004 - 2:19 pm
“…We may be able to use their help on occasion, but they are never our friends.”
I stand corrected. They may not even be Allies – but we can at least use them as (what did Stalin call them?) Useful Idiots!
Brian
#15 by Bob Whitaker on 11/05/2004 - 2:28 pm
Brain, it was Lenin who sued the term “useful idiots.”
Stalin said it another way. He sat there and talked to Roosevelt at Yalta and when he left Stalin laughed his keester off.
#16 by Peter on 11/08/2004 - 1:38 am
“My RACE is being destroyed. My sole interest at this moment is the saving of my RACE, and the rest of your issues can go to hell.”
Could you put that in the form of a prayer in the 1928 Prayerbook? (Ask Lake’s wife for a copy.)