According to every selective breeding theory about humanity, the Middle East should have the greatest geniuses on earth. The top man was allowed to have four wives and before that any number of concubines. The best genes would have proliferated, the way they do in the animal kingdom in most social animals, where dominant males have herds of females.
I do not think that anyone can look at the societies where harems and concubinage proliferated and detected a Master Race there. But all the theories that say that society is just a bunch of individuals with Family Values, the Work Ethics, and high IQ’s would find all the geniuses there.
Not only is that not the case, NONE of the geniuses in those countries stands a chance.
Before we butterfly off this base, let’s take a look at how BASIC this is. Let us see it CONCEPTUALLY. Building societies on individuals has been tried. It has not only failed, it has been history’s main disaster. One Chinese designer of computer ware may be a useful citizen, but China as a society, without white CONCEPTS, is a stagnant ant heap.
A melting-pot building on individual qualities is not only not successful, it is catastrophic. If there were a single society where it worked, the Bell Curve would tell you it would have a hundred times as many geniuses as any other country.
One more time: It is not that this just didn’t WORK. It was, in every single case, a catastrophe.
It doesn’t matter how a society respected personal merits to the detriment of being WHITE, the result was ALWAYS a catastrophe.
I want some concepts as to WHY that is true. There are a million people getting paid to prove that it isn’t. Nobody spends that kind of money trying to disprove and outlaw something unless it is an almost impossible job.
#1 by Alan B. on 12/09/2006 - 5:33 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Few Americans are aware of they spys that walk amoung us and those spys are seeking out technology. The Japanese are notorious for this and it is not unlike Japan to infringe on pattons that protect the inventions born from the creativity of the white race whether european or American. The Japanese make quality goods, can anybody name just on thing they invented and are famous for, I can not off hand. The white race is the only race responsible for all the modern convienences the world takes for granted today. Whether it relates to industry, medicine or law we have set the example for the rest of the world. Look at China a nation of over one billion people and they can not produce one original thing the world envys, its the herd mentality at its best. The white race flourished because our race pocessed all the qualities necessary to keep at bay all the other races that not only out numbered us but threatened our very existence as a people if distructive out side influences were to infect our culture. So here we have multicultrialism, race mixing, and unnatural and distructive social experiment that has already exibited dire effects in all white countries. In England the muslems are demanding that their cultrial values and laws be left alone, in Paris muslem riots led to whites being set afire and property in the millions destroyed. In America one can hardly read a label on goods, it takes 5 minutes to locate the english version on the package. Christmas is under attack and whites are treated like second class citizens while our non white invaders are bestowed with preferences. All these sick and twisted man made disasters and taking place before our us and yet few rise up and raise hell. What we have today is just a small taste of what will occur 30 years from now when we are a minority. I hate to immagine what a misreable, souless and toxic waste dump of humanity my country will be when that time arrives. I want to put a stop to this twisted and sick pipe dream called multicultrialism, my fight is for the future generations of whites, its not about the individual its about our family, PERIOD.
#2 by Mark on 12/09/2006 - 9:16 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
“I do not think that anyone can look at the societies where harems and concubinage proliferated and detected a Master Race there.”
No, but I bet there were a lot of HAPPY men.
#3 by Dennis on 12/10/2006 - 12:04 am
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Harems tend to proliferate the genetics that produce the kind of people that had harems. Take a look at which type of people had harems. Scientists? Philosophers? The intellectuals? Inventors? Artists, thinkers? Probably not.
The way any society, or group acts as a whole, is quite different from how the individuals within them act. You can have particular people who are intelligent, well natures, but as a GROUP, behaiviours that dont exists when dealing with people one on one come out. This is a type of social emergence, where the behaiviour of a group, consists of MORE than the aggregate behaiviour of the individuals. An Oriental or a Black person can seem to fit in when alone, but when in a group, those characteristics which we associate with these races come out as these people interact with each other. Even ourselves, as individuals act different depending on the people we are around, and so it is true for races. OTher races appear more ‘white acting’, when surrounded by whties.
Liberals dont understand this. They do not comprehend, or do not want to comprehend the idea, that differences in races, which may and do contribute to different living standards can only been seen in that race, as a group, no in individual members of that race.
We are often blind to how different races are and how different our socieities are, because we are so used to dealing with other races on an individual, one on one level, and not with them as a group.
#4 by Antonio Fini on 12/10/2006 - 12:31 am
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
I think the answer is that racial groups originate from a very small number of individuals (usually a clan of less than 50) posessing a set of characteristics that give them a slight survival edge over their competitors.
No matter how many Charlemagnes (or Mohameds) impregnate a harem of women, the genotype is capable of only so much variation within its predefined limits. I believe the mechanism is called reversion to mean. In other words, when a very smart man marries a slightly less smart woman their offspring will fall somewhere between the mother and father’s intelligence range. The offspring will then mate with an individual closer to average brainpower for that population group. So after a generation or two, these exceptional parents produce merely average decendants. Just look at George W.
I’m sure this is what Nietzsche was grasping for when he said the very best examples of mankind were still quite far from superman.
This also accounts for the inability of blacks to produce any real geniuses; it’s simply outside the range of their collective inheritable traits. And even if it wasn’t, that Black genius couldn’t find enough collaborators or equal breeding partners to perpetuate his traits.
The problem is further compicated because nobody has plotted a bell curve for the traits of conformity and creativity, though such curves must exist. The Asian creativity curve must be quite flat, hence a race of conformists. The White creativity curve must have enough rebels and crackpots at the far right end to enable a radical like Edison or Jefferson to up-end our civilization before it sinks into Asiatic stagnation. Our curve must also have enough “solid citizens” in the dome of the bell to insure revolutions are both infrequent and sustainable once they succeed. Viewed in this light the danger in supressing White hetero males is nothing less than crashing modern civilization. Maybe it’s already starting to happen.
#5 by Dennis on 12/10/2006 - 6:49 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
The phenomenon, where certain traits tend towards a predefined average is called “regression to mean”
It works like this. Two exceptionally tall, or short, or intelligent, or unintelligent people havea child. Rather than that child display that characteristic in an even greater magnitude, it tends to be less prominent. So two smart people will have a smart child, but that child will tend towards the average IQ and therefore more likely not to be as intelligent as its parents, than more intelligent. It’s been shown that different races have different means that they regress to. However, after long periods of selection, that ‘mean’ itself, will shift.
My opinion is that the seeds of an advances civilization are found in the exceptional individuals that a society produces, and these individuals must be able to be supported by a functioning society. A Socrates or Edison born in complete poverty would have not made the contribution that they did.
Also interesting to note, is how people assume that our civilisation is seemingly a natural and easy process, something that is inevitable and would happen anywhere, unless stifled. Hence the reason people blame ‘white suppression’ on the failure of others to be able to create the standard of living for themselves, that we have for ourselves.
But when you look at all of humanity, throughout all of human history, you find that there is a very small proportion of people, in a very small period of time, that have been able to advance themselves. Humanity, by default, I believe is destined to live, and designed to live a basic and uncomfortable existance. The presence of people and societies than can elevate people above this, are the exception, not the norm.