B. U. G. S.

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

“…you can become a nutball who looks forward to a race war that is to be fought when the day when the “shit hits the fan” — a day that never seems to arrive…”

Oh really? Hey Parker, have you ever compared white South Africa with that of today’s multicult version? A race war IS being fought as we speak. The liberal media knows this but fails to comment on it over here in America — probably because they were the bullhorn-mouthpiece that “shamed” American politicians into embracing black leadership in South Africa. Now that it’s a proven disaster they run to the shadows and pretend they weren’t to blame. They close their eyes, just like you.

I’d also like to point out a contrast in America. In the 1950’s, before whites engaged in the disastrous “civil right” campaigns for negroes, whites could safely walk through inner city areas of most major metropolitans — even at night. When “equality” was given to blacks in the 1960’s all that changed. Now we have the better portion of ALL major US cities infested with blacks — and if a white man takes a stroll through those areas — even in broad daylight — his life is in REAL danger.

Black on white crime in America is at an all time high as well — and according to the U.S. Justice Department figures, blacks account for nearly 2/3 or ALL violent crimes committed in America — even though they as a “people” account for less than 13% of the population. This started when we gave negros the same rights whites.

I don’t know what type of race war you are looking for, but as far as I’m concerned It’s already here — NOW!!– thanks to idiot race traitors like yourself.

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

Bob I wouldn’t extend the straight contrasts you draw between normalist/wordist to create artificial racist/nationalist distinctions. I’m sure you know nation and nation-state are two different things and that a nation is a group of people with common ancestry, i.e something that includes (and cannot exclude) race.

When you distinguish between normalists and wordists, you’re clear that a normalist’s flag is his skin, whereas a wordist’s is some colored cloth or fancy book. You’re not so clear when you split racists/nationalists.

Parker is not a nationalist because he’s loyal to a country, not to a people. The word for him should be nation-state-ist or countryist, if anything. A nation is common ncestry which boils down to common blood, faith, soil and honor (historic memory). You can’t let one pillar of identity roll down the hill and still call yourself a nationalist (in his case blood – he sacrificed the pillar by advocating racial engineering of the French).

(Digression – by “faith” one means religious heritage, i.e christmas trees etc not text in bibles; By soil one means ancestral homeland, not text in constitutions; By honor one means ancestral history, i.e. western civilization and the dead white males that made it, not loyalty to text in history books. End digression – don’t want anyone confusing identity with wordism!)

Just because a nationalist should also be concerned about protecting ancestral soil, faith and honor (history) doesn’t mean he can forfeit blood. What an absurd notion. After decades of relentless assault against all four pillars, you’d think the fact that weakening one weakens all would have sunk in by now.

It’s a shame that the old definition for nation has fallen into disuse and been replaced by the anthropolgist’s “ethnicity” while the word nation has increasingly come to mean “country”. I agree that it is a bit weird to use a definition for one’s point of view that is now open to misinterpretation, but going alonmg with fashion and adopting ethnicity-ist isn’t appealing – it’s hardly pronounceable! The price of staying with the old word is that some people let their thinking flow along with the semantics and become countryists or colored-cloth-on-pole-ists.

Anyway, the way I’ve always seen it is that racist is a derogatory term for nationalist, not something else. Plus I’ve never met a racist who ignores the rest of identity – have you ever met one who’d marry his daughter to Abdul the blond blue eyed Moslem Kurd in Turkey? Me neither.

Having said all this, I’m not a white racist, white racialist, white nationalist or white liberationist. I agree with Fred Scrooby, I’m simply normal and I refuse to adopt any other label that gives legitimacy to white-haters and racial engineers.

Fred Scrooby: A normal person who believes in normalness –

It is still apolitical common sense that France should not become an Islamic republic and that California should not be re-occupied by Mexico. To see both of those things requires nothing other than apolitical common sense. That and the rest of the above is normalness. There’s no such thing as white nationalism. It’s redundant. What there are are various pathologies manifesting as narcissism, the absence of a social conscience, dishonesty, stupidity, cultural illiteracy, and so on, against which normal people react.
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Saturday, September 9, 2006 at 11:23 PM | #

White nationalism is the name for White opposition to our ongoing dispossession.
Posted by Rnl on Saturday, September 9, 2006 at 10:53 PM | #

Whan a burglar enters your home at night to take away your property do you come up with a special name for yourself vis-à-vis him? “Property Defender,” maybe? Do you say, “I’m something called a ‘Property Defender,’ therefore I oppose burglary”? Or do you say, “Some son-of-a-bitch-bastard came into my home last night and stole my stuff”?

I say the second.

Notice that making up a special name for yourself—a special name for normalness—implicitly concedes legitimacy to, in this case, the burglar, as if burglary was normal so a special name was needed to distinguish your kind of normalness from his. But burglary isn’t normal. There’s only one normalness. He need the special name of burglar, not you. Are you going to start calling yourself an “unburglar”? Of course not. Why not? Because normal people going about their business need no special name. They’re normal.
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Saturday, September 9, 2006 at 11:37 PM | #

What it comes down to, I think, is I concede nothing to the other side in terms of legitimacy. Nothing whatsoever. Absolutely zero. I’m going to call myself by some special name for opposing something that has absolutely no legitimacy of any kind whatsoever, zero?
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sunday, September 10, 2006 at 12:13 AM | #

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

Looks like Parker ran into Jane Fonda and she sliped that funny little pill in his expresso. Parker you talk about social engineering when you mention that goverment must bring the non whites into the family. I hate this muticultrial treason because it always requires me to sacrifice something to accomidate others who are allien to my society, it also forces me to have faith in word and a religion I don not want to belong to. Parker a true family does not require or depend on that do gooder horse shit. Homogenous peoples are always a family and thats what we have been trying to say for ever. Multicultrialsm is horse hit because it revolves around words, just do this or that and all will be well. No matter how you spice shit, it will always taste and look like shit, your an idealist.

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

If our future racial nationalist state consisted of five percent non-whites of exceptional talent, say the top Japanese engineers and origami experts, and maybe a few famous Jazz musicians, what difference would it make?

They would know their place as aliens, remaining only at our pleasure and forbidden from miscegenating or buying political influence. In this arrangement we would gain something while powerful foreign competitors would lose the far right end of their bell curve. For this reason I think we should treat our foreign guests quite well aside from letting them have our women or write newspaper editorials.

As it is, we get nothing but the dregs.

And one day Mexico will be a White country.

This will happen when the last brown skinned Mexican swims over the Rio Grande to get the last available job in a Texas meatpacking plant. The Mexican Euro-elite know this and are doing everthing they can to hasten their ethnic cleansing program. Artificial intelligence may one day eliminate the need for a non-White coolie class. By that time America will be the third world.

The only choice that will be given to non-Whites, race mixers and their offspring wiii be the choice of the suitcase or the coffin! Non-whites do not have the moral, intellectual or cultural capcity to assimilate, so they must leave, all of them.

If you don’t think that a racial war of extermination is coming then YOU are delusional.

Viva La Raza Blanca!!

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

“Our issue is a white issue and only a white issue, we want nothing of muticutrialism”

I’m talking about multi-racialism, about the seemingly culturally assimilated non-whites in a predominantly white, but undeniably multi-racial society.

“Non-whites do not have the moral, intellectual or cultural capcity to assimilate”

But some have. They are not Jews you know. OK, maybe you deny that they have assimilated. Let’s say that they “impersonate” us. But the point is it is uncanny how some non-whites can “impersonate” whites so well. You see somebody who sounds and acts like you, but looks quite different.

That is what I’m holding up as the problem. I know WE don’t consider them to be one of us, but we seem to be hoping that other whites will be as radical as we are.

Remember, I am only talking about the seemingly assimilated non-whites and not blacks and not the unassimilated. I don’t see how raising this issue this would contradict my earlier posts or make me a traitor to the cause, or would prove that I disagree with the views expressed on this blog. I think this treatment is unfair and furthermore, the ease of which folks in this community turn on others who have questions or quandaries is itself sociopathic behavior. Especially on this blog that seeks leaders, we should be able to raise questions and find the answers needed, and not be condemned and vilified for asking.

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

Mark, the Media and of course the gutless politicans harped on South Africa day in and day out. The news media dispised South Africa because it stood out as a shinning example of White superiorty VS non white stagnation. This was an embarresment to all those leftist who deny that blacks are inferior to whites, so White South Africa had to go, even if it meant draging the entire nation down the gutter. To a PC leftist, a prosporus African nation led by a minortiy white goverment is bad, it never mattered to them that blacks were more prosperous under this system, it theory always come before humanity, thats why they are freaks. Anyway the White traitors sold out their people and as expected the nation went down the pits like the rest of the country, and these White idealist freaks would tell you that Soputh Africa is better off today, of course they never bring up South Africa on the news anymore.

One other thing Mark, try not to come across as an overly sensitive twerp. Thanks

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

“One other thing Mark, try not to come across as an overly sensitive twerp. Thanks”

Again, did you actually READ what I wrote? You talk a lot but that’s all I see you doing. You have no clue as to what was actually said, do you? I was not arguing any other point than the fact that there is a race war going on now. You, my ignorant college goof, are proof positive that government schools do nothing but create big mouths and little brains.