NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
I see the ‘creative loafing’ website has put a pic of you above a caption on Don Black, and vice versa. Is that a compliment or an insult?
http://atlanta.creativeloafing.com/gyrobase/Content?category=oid%3A8073
Comment by richard
ME:
Anything that identifies me with Don Black is flattery. And he spelled our names right.
Sugg identified me as Don and Don as me. A year ago Fox promoted me from Reagan appointee to Reagan cabinet member.
As I just wrote Kelso, I did get a kick out of the fact that the biography of Don over my name said that I had tried to invade a non-Communist Caribbean country. I laughed because, as it happens, outside of Cuba, the Caribbean is about the ONLY place I HAVEN’T invaded at one time or another.
#1 by Alan on 03/01/2007 - 11:52 am
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
I love how unprofessional the news organizations have become. They confuse faces and names which are simple details to the moderate information such asBob’s past job description. See what happens when detail to accuracy and professionism is replaced by hype and sensation, its all words, damn the accuracy.
#2 by C.E. Whiteoak on 03/01/2007 - 1:21 pm
Creative Loafing has corrected the pictures! Bob is now Bob and Don is Don. This can only mean one thing: The editors of Creative Loafing are readers of Bob’s Blog! Maybe they can be deprogrammed.
#3 by Alan on 03/01/2007 - 2:35 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Richard, professional journalism is a by word, it is all about the message they wish to spread, hype and drama has replaced investigation and accuracy. The message in that article was, bad white racist, it did not matter whether the faces matched the names, this out fit could care less. PC calls all their enemies racist, it is the label that is important, truth and accuracy is irrelavent. This is why we strive to wake the idle minds of others, that way they can see the BS that passes for truth and fact.
#4 by Pain on 03/01/2007 - 3:16 pm
NOT SPÆM
NOT SPÆM
The Mantra just appeared as a comment in that article.
#5 by Peter on 03/01/2007 - 10:48 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
We could adopt the slogan, “Whites: The New Jews”
I think if immigration keeps up unabated, you might be right about this white collective forming, but I don’t see how it would be exclusively white. Wouldn’t whites who have half caste or adopted non-white children carry their children into this collective? What of the Angelina Jolies and Heidi Klums? Sure it would be mostly white, and it would be called white, but I think you would have these assimilated-appearing mestizos and Asians as well — Norman Mineta and Bill Richardson types. I don’t see how whites would choose to exclude them, especially since some of them are more “white” than actual whites (ie: some Stormfront members).
Al Parker
#6 by Pain on 03/02/2007 - 2:34 am
NOT SPÆM
NOT SPÆM
Where are you gone, Bobby boy, Bobby Boy?
#7 by Bob on 03/02/2007 - 11:15 am
Come on, Alan. You know all white gentiles look alike.
#8 by Bob on 03/02/2007 - 1:36 pm
To the ding-a-ling ward, Pain, me ole Buddy.
Seeing what the “sane” people have made of the world, it’s the only place I feel safe.