I wish that, when you read my stuff, you would think of me as trying to lead you through tangled undergrowth. Normally, in he important ones, I go over the usual “two sides” you have been presented with all your life, and then make a point that, if you follow ME closely,
The problem is that, as I go through the usual clutter of ideas you are used to, I hit every hot button you have had inserted in you over your whole lifetime. But Bob’s Blog is useless if it is just a discussion of what you are used to.
One person wrote the usual point about how we have to control the national media. I don’t think he is a regular reader, or he would have gotten one of my major points: That if we accept that some people are after money, some fame, some offices, and we are after POWER. He is simply going back over the same old ground he is trained to go over. I teach that owning things is not the key to POWER.
In the last piece, “The Hook, I went through the history of the ianity that has substituted itself for Christ. But the point was that this is an example of how we confuse Christianity in the West wither with all that the West is, or, on the other extreme, as the cause of all our troubles.
I am glad to have the comments, and I was the one who says that I often don’t answer your questions but make the points you make me think of. Pain got my point best. One commenter was offended by my using ‘hook-nosed.” I am with him. I am desperately tired of statements about The Evil Jew. But in this case, it was just another example of the fact that, if I have to choose between good taste and a good pun, I will choose the pun, Boredom is a reader’s worst enemy.
Come on, now, how could I be writing about The Hook, then the Jews, and not throw “hook-nose” in there? All of this distracts from what Bob’s Underground Seminar IS. If you were able to go through my writings and extract the usual hot point “both sides” out of it, you would have a long series of critical observations. “Both sides,” in the end, have nothing to do with what I am teaching here.
I started “The Hook” talking, not abut Christianity, but about Communism. There is a hook in EVERY side of EVERY issue you are exposed to. The institution you love most has a hook in it. The institution you hate most has a hook in it. You have to see THE HOOKS to see the truth.
Randian total freedom and Marx’s “dictatorship of the proletariat” are the same thing from my point of view. But you are trained to regard them as “both sides.” To me, the Catholic priesthood and the Calvinist priesthood and the Politically Correct priesthood are the same thing, though they regard themselves as complete opposites, and everyone is trained to do that.
You are expected to have your own world-view. But you are in THIS class to get what the Prof has to TEACH you, not to agree with every example he gives.
I want YOUR comments, but I want you to read the piece and say, “What is BOB saying here?” My short summations are more important than all the lead-in to it. The lead-ins you can get ANYWHERE.
My theology you can get anywhere. My prejudices you can get anywhere. You are HERE for a reason, and what makes my job so difficult is that this is the ONLY place where the aim is NOT indoctrination. The point here is to go over the familiar and then cut through the bullshit and give you a rational approach. That means REPEATING the bullshit. But if you get wrapped up in THAT, you lost the path completely.
I will often say, “This is the conservative viewpoint. This is the antireligious viewpoint.” I oversimplify both because I would bore you to death if I went into all I know abut both and made it exact.
By the time I get to MY point, which is the only that makes this reading worthwhile to you, most readers are lost back in my descriptions of where we are. Back Bay Grouch and Elizabeth are analyzing my comments about priests abut how they get along with THEIR priests. By the time I get to MY point, I am almost alone.
So when I wrote abut the Masturbation Generation and how they, like Catholic bishops, are ashamed of how they let the sergeants molest them or their comrades, all I got was a discussion of the military or the Catholic Church as homosexual outfits. I had to repeat over and over and over and over that this had nothing to do with what I was saying.
I describe what we usually think about on any given issue and you are still correcting me about THAT, since that is what you know about already. So while I am describing how Rand and Marx are similar, you are welcome to give me information abut Rand and Marx, but you should also be looking for what ***I*** am saying here.
A good example of this is that Back Bay Grouch will think I just criticized his talking his relationship with his own priest. I am NOT. I read it several times and I NEED it. That is what you are USED to hearing about. That is NOT what I am saying.
When I describe Rand and Marx or respectable conservatism and liberalism or Toynbee versus Yockey, I am concentrating on telling you that, while your eyes have been fixed on the battle between THEM, you are so obsessed with THAT that you cannot see that that is NOT where the truth lies. They are both arguing abut nonessentials that are important to THEM, and they are in full agreement that the truth is not where it REALLY is.
I am trying to get you to raise your eyes and see the truth.
#1 by Alan on 03/18/2007 - 1:27 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
I often listen to people trying to rationalize what the leftist present to the public, whether it is gay marriage or equality the end game to me IS, “The Objective”. The Objective IS control through fragmentation and division, social unrest and moral perversion is a tactic. like a boxer they soften us up with the jabs right before the hit us with that over hand right.
#2 by MrWebb on 03/18/2007 - 5:17 pm
not spam
not spam
Sir, in my opinion, your teachings are not worth two cents. Worse, it is my opinion that you are deceiving your audience.
“One person wrote the usual point about how we have to control the national media. I don’t think he is a regular reader, or he would have gotten one of my major points: that if we accept that some people are after money, some fame, some offices, and we are after POWER. He is simply going back over the same old ground he is trained to go over. I teach that owning things is not the key to POWER.”
In this way just for starters I see you as deceiving your audience. You must know that the mainstream media/corporate media is responsible for the brainwashing of the people that you claim to want to rescue. But you want to minimize the POWER of the mainstream media/corporate media to corrupt the minds of the very people you claim to want to rescue from genocide.
You assert that my point is the “usual point” made on your blog. I have never seen this point mentioned on your blog. A “usual point” would be a point frequently made. Well, my point has not been made on your blog while I have paid any attention to it. Your “people,” the people you supposedly want to rescue from genocide will never be rescued from genocide as long as the mainstream media/corporate media is able to continue its brainwashing of the American public as it has for as many years as you have been living and you know it. That medium has to be neutered or your “people” have no chance of avoiding genocide and I don’t know how you can fail to see that.
Are you going to suggest to me, MrWebb, that the ability to brainwash the overwhelming majority of Americans to accept white genocide is not POWER? If you can’t see that as POWER (your favorite word) then you have no sight at all. That you are surrounded by a small army of sychophants telling you that you are The Christ won’t change matters any. The key will be to remove the POWER of the mainstream media/corporate media. Until you do that you will be doing nothing but pissing in the wind.
No, you don’t want to address the problem of the mainstream media/corporate media because you know that that’s where some serious POWER resides. You want to pretend that your ridiculous blog has some kind of power. It will never have any power at all if it fails to address factual matters.
Genocide is a serious topic. It is not a topic that can afford to be dealt with lightly. It is not a topic where the truth can be evaded and discovered at the same time. If you can minimize the POWER of the mainstream media/corporate media in front of your audience then I think you either don’t really know what you are talking about at all or you are not being honest with your listeners. That is an opinion that I cannot fail to hold after having listened to your “teachings” for some time.
If you, Sir, were in charge of the mainstream media/corporate media would you conduct business as this pack of genocidal swine is conducting it? No? OK. Do you wield the POWER to influence the American public to the extent that the mainstream media/corporate media does? No? OK. Who do you think is going to win this battle if you continue to claim that the mainstream media/corporate media has no POWER worth even considering?
Sir, you strain at a gnat and swallow a camel every time. You don’t want to talk about the things that might bring about a serious victory. You want to quibble about religion and history and economics and any kind of babble that might come down the pike and cause you to “think about something.” While you’re “thinking about something” you and all the sychophants that follow you will become victims of genocide. You’re into pseudointellectual nonsense. When something real comes along you run away from it because you know it’s the truth. Something real like the POWER of the mainstream media/corporate media and its ability to bring about the white genocide that you claim to be resisting. Now go line up your sychophants and have them assail me. Keep them in the dark. They’re mushrooms anyway. You already know that. What do they know about truth? Whatever you tell them.
MrWebb
#3 by Simmons on 03/18/2007 - 7:25 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Its about asking pointed specific questions without fear not listening to the holy men of the lates religion. Bob is the dean of the “School of the New Inquiry,”
#4 by LibAnon on 03/18/2007 - 8:03 pm
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
MrWebb,
Bob’s Blog is about one simple, profound, and true idea: EVERY institution, without exception, is a racket. “White nationalism” is no less a racket than “political correctness”. Anti-Semitism is no less a racket than Judaism. A plague on ALL those houses! Bob says.
The only true power in the world is the ability to grasp this truth. The only power ANY racket has over ANYBODY is the power the ignorance of its victims grants it. A racket that is SEEN THROUGH has no power, by definition. The worldly power you’re speaking of is, quite literally, an illusion. See through it, and it’s gone.
And in this, Bob is profoundly correct. He has seen behind the curtain. He has paid for this insight with blood. He has paid for this insight with loneliness.
What Bob doesn’t understand is that no more than a TINY group of people will ever understand this. He understands even less that probably no more than a tiny group of people SHOULD understand this, even if that were possible. The masses must be LED. That’s what they want, and that’s what they need. For these, illusions are necessary. All you can hope for is that the illusions by which they live are good for them, not bad.
Nothing horrifies Bob more than the thought of LEADING his people in order to save them. Bob wants a group of people he doesn’t HAVE to lead. Bob wants a group of people who would spit in his face if he even TRIED to lead them. Bob thinks that his crucial, true, hard-won insight, that any so-called worldly “power” or “authority” is nothing more than an ILLUSION and a FARCE, can be spread to the masses like a gospel. He thinks it can be popularized. He thinks it can be spread by spamming newsgroups with mantras. But he’s wrong. There is no royal road to what Bob knows. Anybody who wants to know what Bob knows must pay the price Bob paid. Bob can’t pay it for us, as much as he’d like to. Bob isn’t Jesus.
Bob desperately believes we Aryans are too good to be led by ANYBODY, much less himself. And that’s a great compliment. But he’s wrong. What’s more, it’s an injustice. It’s like leaving a tiny baby in a desert, explaining to the baby that anything of his own flesh and blood should be capable of fending for itself.
A race is not defined by skin color. It is not a mass of people with a certain mix of haplotypes. Rather, a true race is a tiny, burdened, race-bearing nobility that is willing to rule, with love and benevolence, over its kinfolk. If that nobility abdicates this responsibility with the excuse that any such leadership is a fraud and shouldn’t be necessary and is below the dignity and intelligence of everybody involved, then only one thing will happen. The abandoned task of leading that people will be eagerly taken up by its racial enemies, and that people will be led to their physical extermination. That is, of course, what is happening to our people now.
#5 by Peter on 03/19/2007 - 6:43 am
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Bob, I think I got your point and agree.
My reference to my priest was to suggest that the average parish working stiff is not a theologian. Most of those guys are social workers and do a decent job. I would differentiate them from bishops and those in orders,in universities. I have seldom met a Jevvie (Jesuit) who was not arrogant.
My more limited experience with protestants is similar. THe minster trying to put lives and familes back together at AA meetings in the church basement is far removed from the airhead teaching at the Andover School of Theology at Hahvahd.
My refernce to priests was sarcastic, though that did not appear to come across.
The comment was more of a sidebar than a part of the conversation.
Beantown has a long history of anti-Catholic agitation. The jew media is profoundly anti-Catholic and I tend to be irritable on the point.
On the other hand I am thick skinned when someone is on the right path as you are. Plug away.
Back Bay Grouch
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM