This is another of BWs gems in very important basics if you want to understand the trajectory of political semantics for a long time to come.

Millennial promises are a required form of political semantics for nonwhites. It sustains them and it is all they require. If you don’t believe that, look at Cuba for crying out loud.

And we have a future that continues to be mired in racial conflict. That is certain.

And because the semantic domain of political rhetoric must be millennial in character, as it must evoke anthem style emotions, the defining characteristic of white political rhetoric is becoming its very absence.

This is what nobody sees: WE HAVE EVOLVED. Accordingly, whites will not have any political semantics of their own whatsoever.

This is already endlessly puzzling and confounding nonwhites. They are unable to come to terms with it.

In fact, it is a defining characteristic of the current political cycle. And the least interested segment of the population is the white segment, which is logical once you understand why.

Simmons just said it in his comment on “Finishing the sentences of liberals”. Once you quit finishing those sentences, you have won the game. It’s called “being effective”.

That is our future.

And make no mistake it will be a future of heavy conflict. There will be no “perfection” there at all

You might enjoy a good laugh from this website Bob, it’s sketches of utopian futures from the past. Every single one of them is wrong by leaps and bounds.

http://davidszondy.com/future/futurepast.htm

It goes well with your points on futurologists too.