According to the movies, every ancient Spartan looked exactly alike. Each had very black hair, brown eyes, and so forth. According to the new business of restoring the paint on ancient sculpture and ancient pictorals, the warrior level in Ancient Greece looked a lot like the average white American circa 1800.

Hollywood would like to present ancient Greeks as black, with a racially balanced mix. But we have heard too much abotu Indo-Europpeans for that, so they are as dark as Hollywood can make them. Just as Hollywood’s (and PBS’) “realistic” portrayal of Classical times includes gray stone statues no Roman would have tolerated and gray stone buildings likewise, the ancient Greeks are now uniformly dark and ancient Palestine and Egypt have a racially balanced upper crust.

In Cleopatra, Richard Burtion, playing Mark Antony, was screaming, “Why do statues have no eyes?!” Even then historians knew that they DID have eyes. Bright blue ones. In the New York Metropolitan Museum I saw an art piece from about 500 BC in an art museum. It consisted of two wires holding up two orbs painted as eyes. It was apparently an abstract from 500 BC, and they titled it “eyes.”

The eyes were blue.

Nothing else is quite as fake as Politically Correct “realism.”

p

Often when one thinks about it enough, one begins to realize how obvious something is. One finally realizes he should stop being indirect and deal with the question. In other words, state the question plainly and then deal with THAT.

We had to deal with differing racial IQs for a long time because the establishment line was that there was NO racial difference. They dealt with all indications to the contrary by screaming “HITLER!” and the Greatest Generation got on their bellies.

But they always overreach. They could have minimized differences, but their homicidal insistence on IQs being EXACTLY the same, which was essential to “all races are the same,” left them in a position even the moral cowardice of the Greatest Generation could not protect them from forever.

Some of us just wouldn’t quit.

According to historians no one ever wins against the establishment. You won’t read it, but the fact is that even most of the loony left now concedes that racial IQs are different. It was amazing how little storm was raised by The Bell Curve, and one of the leading mainline psychology journals had a lead article by Rushton and Jensen.

But now that the pros have chimed in on us amateurs who fought this fight when it was tiny, they want to go ahead with IQ. But IQ is not really the point. The POINT of hitting on IQ a generation ago was because that was VULNERABLE.

One factor was the increasing familiarity with blacks that would be a part of the future. Today there are very few whites, even in Europe, who are totally out of touch with real blacks as the constituents of Hubert Humphrey of Minnesota, whose single-handed fanaticism on civil rights in the Senate in the 1940s led to the 1948 Democratic platform.

Humphrey wasn’t appealing to a black constituency. He was appealing to fanatical civil righters who had never seen a black outside of Jackie Robinson.

The simple fact is that, except for Obedience Trained Greatest Generation and Mommy Professor’s special darlings, it is impossible for someone who knows the mass of blacks to believe in equal innate intelligence. So we hammered on that.

And won.

But our quest was not to make a god out of IQ. People who make a god out of IQ find that the grants come in if they then worship the high-tested IQs of Jews and Orientals.

But if one does not take this first necessary victory as the Key to Final Truth, what is one left with?

Now, precisely in the face of this IQ bit, it is essential for us to return to the first question. How are races different? Let us ask the plain question: why is it that whites developed a Western Civilization that makes all other Great Civilizations look like abysses of slavery and animal-level technology? What we are asking now becomes obvious: Why is our HISTORY different?

In other words, the question is not something indirectly defined by IQ tests or given a mystical meaning by “Christianity.” The question is the question: Now, precisely in the face of this IQ bit, it is essential for us to return to the first question. How are races different?

The question is not IQ. The question is history. So the answer is where we started: in history.

History today says that civilization is entirely a matter of books. When Political Correctness was getting started the Greatest Generation was just beginning to roll over and play dead. That was in the 1950s. So history said that there was Egypt which led to Greece which led to Rome.

Then all was darkness as the Human Mind, which was contained in writings that went from the Egyptians to the Greeks and then to the Romans, were LOST. All was darkness. If you do not believe anyone could take this seriously, read Foundation and A Canticle for Leibowitz, science fiction books which reflected this time and this view.

Yes, people took it seriously. But if you state it in plain English everybody says that nobody takes this seriously. Then, the minute they relax, they go back to Greece and Rome and the “Dark Ages.” One of the major problems with analyzing what crap this is is getting anybody to recognize it when it is put into plain English.

So Politically Correct History says that with the right books all men are equal. All men, it says, have an equal right to those books and therefore to everything what the white man has done. ALL OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS DEPENDS ON THIS VERSION OF HISTORY.