BUGS Radio with Truck Roy, Jeb and Adelheim.
It is in the in the second article below this one.
We have gotten 74 comments on it so far and I want everybody to hear it and make any comment you have on it.
Comments on BUGS Radio Program are Still Open
Posted by Bob on June 20th, 2013 under Coaching Session
Bob’s Books
Bob's first book - 1976
A Plague On Both Your HousesBob's second book - 1982
THE NEW RIGHT PAPERSBob's deadliest book - 2004
Why Johnny Can't Think:
America's Professor-PriesthoodWhy Johnny Can't Think ebook zip
pwrd: Phu=9Ad5
#1 by dungeoneer on 06/20/2013 - 2:30 pm
Go team BUGS for setting the Aryan direction.
#2 by savethechildren on 06/20/2013 - 4:41 pm
How about an easy way to download? I normally transfer mp3s to a player and listen as I move about. It would help.
#3 by Sunlit Iceberg on 06/21/2013 - 10:41 pm
I do the same too.
#4 by WhiteRabbitAwake on 06/20/2013 - 5:10 pm
Anti-Whitism sounds better than it looks.
#5 by Jason on 06/20/2013 - 7:49 pm
I’m on the fence. It sounded funny at first, but as I heard it more, it may have potential. But I am not sure. Sorry for the lack of help.
#6 by savethechildren on 06/20/2013 - 7:54 pm
Personally I don’t like the sound of it.
#7 by Old King Cole on 06/20/2013 - 8:52 pm
What about “anti-Caucasian”?
#8 by Cleric Preston on 06/20/2013 - 9:33 pm
What about “anti-Caucasian” ?
What about it ?
#9 by dungeoneer on 06/21/2013 - 11:20 am
Have you not seen the anti-whites using the “According to anthropology Arabs are Caucasian, so white genocide is justified” line?
#10 by Asgardian117 on 06/20/2013 - 9:25 pm
Okc… dont get caught up in scientific terms we use white. Please dont take offense
#11 by Skippy 01 on 06/21/2013 - 3:11 am
#8 by Asgardian117: “Okc… dont get caught up in scientific terms we use white.”
I strongly agree.
In movies, the villain uses stilted, slightly elevated language, while the hero uses plainer, more familiar language. The guy who says “summon the child” is the bad guy, the guy who says “send the kid in” is the good guy.
Use white. Don’t use “Aryan”, “Nordic”, “Caucasoid”, “Europid” and other words like that.
#12 by dungeoneer on 06/21/2013 - 8:00 am
As I should`ve explained above, I was using Aryan (here at BUGS) only to point out how we`re looking for a direction, instead of the Oriental The Way.
#13 by Daniel Genseric on 06/20/2013 - 9:37 pm
What about anti-Anglo Saxon?
What about anti-Europid?
What about anti-Occidental?
What about anti-European?
What about a smack in the head?
Stay on message.
Bob……..
#14 by Nordoxen on 06/20/2013 - 10:10 pm
I like how you are trying to lecture Bob of all people about being on message.
Actually, ‘Antiwhitism’ IS on message. Haven’t you learned wording by now?
#15 by Daniel Genseric on 06/21/2013 - 2:45 pm
You misunderstand my appeal to Bob.
These tangential quantum leaps are becoming more and more routine here. Disturbing.
#16 by Daniel Genseric on 06/21/2013 - 2:48 pm
You misunderstand my appeal to Bob.
These tangential quantum leaps are becoming more and more routine here. It’s actually quite disturbing.
Furthermore, I suspect Bob is humoring this exercise.
——————-
Okay. Then, allow me to play Vandal’s advocate:
I’m not really for white genocide, per se. I’m just a vociferous anti-whitist. That is, I simply don’t like all the evil things we whites have done to minorities.
—————-
They are going to key-in on the idea that there are graduated TIERS of “anti-whitism”.
1. (Garden-variety) Anti-white
2. (Devout) Anti-whitist
3. Proponent of White Genocide
You’re giving them an out. Not good.
ALL ANTI-WHITES PROMOTE WHITE GENOCIDE.
ALL ANTI-WHITES PROMOTE WHITE GENOCIDE.
ALL ANTI-WHITES PROMOTE WHITE GENOCIDE.
ALL ANTI-WHITES PROMOTE WHITE GENOCIDE.
#17 by BGLass on 06/21/2013 - 9:53 am
So much money goes into “ists” and “isms” as to make them priceless. What cash amount could one even put on “racism?” So it seems awful to throw them away. “that institution was accused of racist anti-whitism.” If you were selling “racism” how many trillions would you want?
It seems worth way more than “hunger.” Or other things.
#18 by Wm White on 06/21/2013 - 12:18 pm
Anti-whitism is practiced by anti-whites trying to justify white genocide.
#19 by POLARBEAR87j on 06/21/2013 - 12:33 pm
Anti-Whitism in our schools and in our society turn people into anti-whites that support White GeNOcide
This Anti-Whitism must End
and people who pratice it must and will be criminalized in the future.
When someone calls a white person a Racist for objecting to there own peoples GeNOcide then They are practicing and Promoting Anti-Whitism
#20 by dungeoneer on 06/21/2013 - 2:19 pm
Anti-whitism and white genocide will end after they`re openly discussed.
#21 by savethechildren on 06/21/2013 - 5:33 pm
After re-considering the word “anti-whitism,” I think if its emotionalized by emphasizing is as anti-WHITism, it can fly.
Like ,”oh, haha, another anti-WHITism.” smurk and wink, etc.
#22 by c-bear on 06/22/2013 - 2:20 am
It’s our terminology, and it could work. There is only one way to find out, right? I’m open to trying out new ideas.
#23 by savethechildren on 06/22/2013 - 5:26 pm
You could use it when someone makes a bunch of antiwhite accusations. Just say, “more baseless anti-whitism!” And then post more mantra based statements, just ignoring all the effort they made to justify White genocide. “More anti-whitisms” could be a good way to just blow them off. I’m going to use it.
#24 by Nordoxen on 06/23/2013 - 11:23 am
I sometimes use it as a question or statement when I link to some anti-white news article, like:
“What should we do about the growing concern of antiwhitism?”
“Is there no end to the widespread antiwhitism in our society?”
“Antiwhitism is widespread among anti-whites in our society, what do you think the reason behind the hatred is?”
And then let people debate and talk about it spreading the terminology for me further lol. Interestingly enough, not one have ever questioned the meaning behind the word. Everybody knows what it means, thanks to the “antisemitism” indoctrination.
Even if they did ask, all you have to ask is either:
“What is antisemitism?”
or
“What do you think it is?” and let them define it for you.
#25 by Nordoxen on 06/23/2013 - 11:34 am
Questions are powerful. It’s passive offensive.
I use that method with the rest of the terminology as well.
“Are you anti-white?”, “Why are you so anti-white?”, “Why do you support White genocide?”
If they try to deny it, you can either say “Good.” or question it again and point out their anti-white justifications or contradictions: “Really? It sounds like you are anti-white when you say X or try to X”.
#26 by mandela on 06/23/2013 - 9:10 pm
I think it is OK, I will try it when I see others using it.
It is pretty much the word anti-White
#27 by WhiteRabbitAwake on 06/24/2013 - 2:39 am
I have just realised what has been done here.
By discussing anti-Whitism (…TWICE!) even those against it here have thought about the term, it has entered our thoughts, become more of an acceptable word and will soon be natural to use.
Clever, very clever. That’s what BUGSers do out there. Very Clever.
#28 by jimmy blue eyes on 06/24/2013 - 5:16 pm
Nordoxen
Good point….I once mentioned blending out white culture…I was
asked to “define white culture”….the anti-white femicommie then smirked, because I and she both knew she was going to break apart each arguement for what defines white culture…so I reversed it…
“It is the same as african culture in africa or asian culture in asia, except its the white version in white countries, and don’t you dare belittle the africans and asians by denying their proud rich cultures and heritage, just to say whites don’t have one”
At that moment her eyes glazed over, she had no comment, and the african with her then looked to her anticipating her answer…which was.
“I am not going to continue to argue with a racist who can’t be convinced he is wrong”. She walked away and her college friends followed…(I assume college…it is a college town)