On one major point anti-whites are perfectly correct: As white genocide becomes more and more familiar, other questions will be raised.

It is forgotten now, but the hard line Soviets were right in the 1980s: Once discussion was allowed to start, the whole system would collapse.

As usual, no one but me noticed the pivotal moment in history. Gorbachev was visiting Estonia, and began to talk with the crowd on the street. He looked at one of the complainants and said, with a smile, “Would you like Estonia to SECEDE?”

I knew the look on his face very well. It was the look Northerners always had when they mentioned secession. It was the confidence that nobody wanted to seceded from the USSR.

“You complain about integration? Well, we COULD just kick you out of the Union!”

The American press had had a heyday on exactly the same theme. There were endless numbers of cartoons showing men in Confederate uniforms labeled “Ukraine” and Estonia” and so forth.

Secessions? It was a JOKE!

Only I seemed to remember that the Soviet Constitution, like the Canadian Constitution of 1867, specifically allowed secession!

What I saw that no one else seemed to notice was the look on Gorby’s face when the Estonian said, “YES!”

He looked exactly the way a Yankee would look if a Southerner relied “YES” to secession and then showed we could DO it.

It was a pivotal moment, and only I saw it.

Anti-whites shout that if we are allowed to question White Genocide, people will start questioning everything else the public has been forced to accept over two generations.

They are perfectly correct.

Like the Soviet Establishment before it, our present neo-Marxists rulers are in a balloon they think is a monolith.

As I have repeatedly pointed out, The French leader Sarkozy made a speech, which is on White Rabbit’s YouTube, in which he threatens to use force if the French do not intermarry soon!

No one mentions it!

Here, in “We will use force for interracial marriage,” is the kind of statement anti-whites would never let people forget.

And our side? Down the Memory Hole, where the anti-whites desperately want it.

In talking about other pro-whites, I TRY to make suggestions rather than criticisms. But a 73-year-old man may go over that line after sixty years of bare-knuckle political battle.

I have made it clear that people who have built up organizations and raised money have to have the emphasis they learned that does that.

But I did all this as a paid professional, and in thousands of hours of nose-to-nose debate, I learned to find points that took NO time to throw in.

“Chasing down white flight” is one of those phrases I would work into any discussion I was having. I have learned a feel for what works.

I get ticked at David and Jared and James when they have a twenty minute interview and doesn’t use any of my powerful stuff, which takes ten seconds or less. The stuff I came up with was USED by people who were elected and who raised funds.

Anti-whites keep saying that we say that immigration is only for white countries, “but it isn’t so.” But just to mention that fact is poison to their side.

I work very hard at this, for free. I am used to my products being ignored, but I RESENT it.

Meanwhile keep thinking about “Chasing Down White Flight” and keep commenting on it and reading any new comments there.

OK, gang, the seminar is over. It’s time for some postgrad work on YOUR PART.

I want comments on the title of this article: You may explain what it is, or what it makes you think of.

Brevity is the soul of wit, the more you write the less you say.

THIS TOPIC WILL REMAIN OPEN FOR COMMENTS PERMANENTLY. Please refer back to it regularly to read what is added.