Archive for September, 2015

White Rage

The black rage is their defense.

Now when the young guy in Charleston did his shootings, they instantly convicted me which gave us lots of publicity.

The guy who just did the Jewish Center killings has just been convicted. At the beginning of his closing argument he put up on the whiteboard that “Diversity is a code word for White Genocide”.

But oddly enough, nobody came after me.  photo whiterage_1.jpg

One explanation for this is, the same reason they put it off with CNN, they can’t deal with me.

But all this has made me consider White Rage.

If a black man runs around killing white people, it’s because of oppression.

Now if we have white guys out killing, In The Name Of White Genocide, it may be a warning.

Isolated Black killings of whites are the result of a legitimate “Black Rage”.

So isolated killings In The Name Of Genocide, may mean that instead stopping all discussion of White Genocide, the White Rage may indicate that’s exactly what we need to discuss. Or are we going to just have people keep picking up guns?

At the moment we’ve had very isolated incidents, two of them, but should we not consider White Rage?

There is no excuse for anybody just shooting other people, on a basis like this, but it may signify that we are going to have to discuss the real issue. And that does not mean with in the current bounds.

So maybe we should start looking at these isolated two killings as White Rage.

And a warning.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Comments

The BUGS Idea of “Winning” an Argument

Bill Rusher wrote a book called “How to Win an Argument.”

Even then the idea struck me as a bit childish, though of course I never said so.

If you want something to brag about among the lightweights of National Review, you aim at WINNING.  You end the story triumphantly by saying, “And you should have seen the look on his face!”

Power consists of making points that would never occur to any respectable conservative. photo Switzerlandiamperhapsstartingtothinkthatgunsdont_e31198_4302196.jpg

I constantly lost arguments by using the word “all.”

“All Communist countries have armed guards to keep their people in.”

Didn’t mind at all if someone made that point and lost the argument.

My point was made.

On gun control, I would bring up Switzerland.  It has guns in millions of private hands and no more gun crime than other European countries with fanatical gun control.

I didn’t mind the other person thinking they “won” because they listed all the European countries with fanatical gun control and low gun crime.

Despite the fact that my boss was on the NRA Board of Directors and I wrote him at least a dozen speeches on guns in Switzerland, no conservative defending against gun control ever used that example.

No conservative ever whispered about the prison walls around all Communist states.

They were afraid that if they made the point they would lose the argument.

To me they were Losers.

They  probably thought they were Being Shrewd.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 Comments