B. U. G. S.

Ehhh even I have to wonder why the big preoccupation with them. The Anonymous thing was a good idea but let’s keep moving on people! What else can we infiltrate with our message? I’m thinking of trying to sloowwllyy gather some support from these folks protesting all across the country yeah? Sure they’re mostly a bunch of confused anti-Whites and just plain out people looking for a party but I see potential in this crowd…Come on People don’t fixate on one new idea come up with new ones every day!

A while back we swarmed an anti-white who went by the name “The Amazing Atheist.”
This character now has his own forum called “ThatFatAtheist Forums!”: http://forum.thatfatatheist.com/index/
Now… The last thing I want to do is distract anyone from the genocide meme. I think this could be used to create the sock puppet we’ve been discussing lately, BUT as I cruise through the site I am stopped dead in my tracks. I mean my jaw literally dropped. On there he has a thread about baby-f***ing. You’ll have to excuse the language, but there is really no other way I can put it.
Hmm… How to approach?
Expose the fat bastard for what he is condoning? Contact the authorities? Maybe a YouTube video on the sick tendencies of these genocidal maniacs? Any ideas? I’m kinda awe-struck at the moment.

Has Bob said anything about the term “pro-White”? I think I picked it up listening to Derek and Don’s show. I just put a post on Amren that used “pro-White” and “anti-White,” but it occurs to me that in MSM if “pro-White” is used with “anti-White,” the former might carry into the penumbra of the latter some of the unpleasant baggage that’s been attached to the word “White.”

I don’t want to do anything that messes in any way with the term “anti-White,” since it seems to me one of our two critical terms.

Pro-white is fine.

But you do make a good point about how the anti-whites have demonized our race to the point where a lot of white people get a knot in the pit of their stomach when the word “white” is even mentioned because they have suffered so many attacks but never any positive things said about our race.

In my opinion we should use white. That’s who we are and we don’t have to be ashamed of it just because we have suffered decades of racial demonization. “European-American” or other things like that just sound wimpy to my ear.

I don’t know why I didn’t do this months ago…. I created Google Alerts for the words” racist” and “racism.” I receive at least 25 alerts per day and I make every attempt to post the mantra or mini-mantra on each and every article regardless of how small or large the number of readers. I want as many people to know that when they write anything about racism or racist, they will need to deal with the mantra every time.

@PeteH

It`s done.I did`nt like having to use that racism daily site.

If you want some fun, there is always some good stuff on threads where we’ve been active for awhile.

In TheAmazingAtheist’s video “Racists are Pathetic” AlbusLepus does, if I do say so myself ( 😉 ) a great job of turning the talk back to White genocide.

The anti-White managed to get the conversation onto crime, which is like candy to Stormfronters or AmRen types. Since a lot of us started off as such, this is an important example.

Do NOT get dragged into a discussion of crime statistics or crime trends. True information means nothing to them. Make your point and move on. If you’re careful, make your tangential point and come right back to the mantra. But if you can’t make your tangential point in just a few words before you come back to the mantra, don’t do it. If you take time to explain, you will lose.

In this example, the anti-White said something about the economic cause for crime. AlbusLepus called BS and pointed out twin studies and the fact that millionaire sports stars commit armed robbery. But that wasn’t his focus, those points were only stated as a lead in back to “anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.”

Now here’s where it got dangerous. The anti-White wanted to talk about millionaire crime AND twin studies. He also threw in some explanation as to why the explanation for crime was still sociological. A Stormfronter would be doomed here. AlbusLepus, a seasoned BUGSer, saw exactly what the anti-White was up to and but the brakes on and said:

“Now you’re moving the goal post. You said that poverty causes crime. It does not. I was providing an example.

I’m not here to argue that one race is more or less criminal. I’m simply saying that Whites have the right to survive. Most pc types argue that they do not, and that any White who supports White survival is “racist”

That’s why I can easily maintain that anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.”

And just like that, the conversation is back directly on White genocide.

If you want to observe this thread, it can be found here:

http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=S6uoYnCvnbE

Race is a social construct is nothing new. Nobody talks about “Chinese privilege” in China. Nobody talks about “Haitian privilege” in Haiti. Nobody talks about “Japanese privilege” in Japan. Nobody talks about “Somalian privilege” in Somalia. Antiracists talk about “white privilege” in white nations, ONLY white nations. They say they are antiracist. What they are is antiwhite. Antiracist is a code word for antiwhite.

Our message is not for the people who are completely lost. True information means nothing to them. Our message is aimed at the audience.

You can’t go wrong by staying on message. All of this “race is a social construct” nonsense is used only in white nations to facilitate massive non-white immigration and forced assimilation in every white nation and only in white nations. It is genocide.

I don’t believe a majority are completely lost, only some. The 40 year old who still believes what his anti-white college professor is lost. Most students are not. The social construct stuff is somewhat new but it is the same old stuff which leads to white genocide.

I am not sure what you mean by “So I guess we just move on if they bring up racial equality?” In what way?

Anti-whites are always arguing from a position that results in no more white people. They didn’t just show up and use the terms “racist” or “white privilege” with any impact immediately. It took quite a bit of repetition until the words had power. Call them out for genocide. Stay on message.

Nobody is flooding black nations and ONLY black nations with non-blacks and saying, “Its OK, there is no such thing as race. So we are going to replace black people with a blended people.” This is happening in white nations and ONLY in white nations. They say they are antiracist. What they are is antiwhite. Antiracist is a code word for antiwhite. And what they want is genocide.