B. U. G. S.

@Harumphty, I recall Bob demanded that they allow the subject of white genocide to be discussed in public before we identify ourselves. I searched for the article but couldn’t locate it.

He is a time waster IMO. We have enough points on there to cover the 73 views of his video.

http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2011/05/08/getting-rid-of-human-time-bombs-means-freedom-of-speech-for-bugs/

Gator, that may be a good argument if you want to go down the scientific route, but it isn’t a mantra response so it doesn’t help. You are on the defensive by responding to their idiotic statement and you have no mantra points in there. Here are some responses I’ve seen:

Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, nobody wants to live where people with brown or black skin live and millions annually risk their lives to live among the people with white skin. Race is real and it matters so much that our race is on the chopping block…mantra.

Nobody is flooding every black nation and ONLY black nations with non-blacks and saying, “Its OK, there is no such thing as race, so we are going to replace black people with a blended people.” This is happening in every white nation… ONLY white nations. They say they are antiracist. What they are is antiwhite. Antiracist is a code word for antiwhite. And what they want is genocide.

So far nobody but me (Bob) has pointed out how obvious this is: “to be a forensic pathologist, you have to do two things:
1) deduce the race of a victim from the tiniest rotting remains, and
2) Join all the other Recognized Experts in denying that race exists.”

If a Bugster wrote anti-racist=anti-white, I would call them out for being lazy. If a non-bugster pro-white writes it rather than blather on about noos and joos, it is a huge step for them because they are on the offensive for a change.

I am not convinced about the absolute need for “code word” but I will think about it.

Gator, I like it!

“The Mantra is considered to be extremely subversive and racist, even though if you read it carefully there is nothing racist about it.”

Gator, this is a rookie mistake. “There is nothing racist about it” is respectably conservative. Our job is to strike away at the power of the word racist by associating all of those who say they are antiracist with how they really are antiwhite. Your statement further advances the power of the word racist by making it negative and giving moral authority to antiracists. They are antiwhite.

Otherwise, well done.

Roderick, the answer is in the mantra. “The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.” You can use this or a variation in any economic discussion.

I like to pull up GDP per nation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_%28PPP%29_per_capita and point out a non-white nation with a higher per capita than a white nation and ask them why anti-whites don’t insist on forced assimilation and immigration in the non-white nation. Always use the mantra.

“@HarvestBuffoon falls victim again to faulty reasoning.
Genome research reveals that “percent difference,” is not a relevant comparison. Small differences can matter tremendously. Mice and humans have many DNA sequences in common, and many mouse genes are very similar to human genes.
When they say there is only a small difference genetically between the races, there is only a small difference genetically between man and chimpanzees …so very small percentages translate into HUGE differences.”
—————————————-
Wolfram, that is a fine response if you want to argue about genetics, but it has nothing to do with the mantra. If you don’t get the mantra in a response, it is not worth much. If you added something like “Why do some scientists insist there is only one race and use it as an excuse to flood every white nation and ONLY white nations with non-whites and force them to ‘assimilate’ out of existence? Why do these scientists have such genocidal intentions?