B. U. G. S.

After watching some SF’ers debate anti-whites over IQ’s, innate ability, jews, white supremacy, and everything but the point of genocide; I’d like to see “respectable white nationalism” or a variant of it popularized.

Note: In the second-last paragraph in the above post, I meant to use “are” instead of “our.” I did this twice. Maybe someone can correct this?

There are few places where the Jewish problem can be discussed. It is, and will remain, an open sore. The private enterprise system of thought control in the United States is more effective than the state tun system in the Soviet Union ever was because it is mostly invisible without the transparent hand of government officials operating it.

Z wants censorship. How very Trotskyite. The first law the commies passed was to outlaw anti-Semitism, not anti-Christianity or anti-Islamism, just anti-Semitism. This is not to be taken as an accusation about. I do not know the man. However, the parallel stands or falls by itself.

Obsession on a point is not good, but blindness is worse. A common Red tactic is to flood a movement with false flag members to discredit it. It is hard to know what an elephant looks like if half of it is behind a wall. Z wants silence on Jews. Not until they are no longer a major part of the problem.

The Nordic pursuit of knowledge, openness of thought, precludes censorship. That freedom does not require rudeness, hatred or endless ranting.

Takimag opened this very same discussion today. There is no perfect solution. There is one perfect anti-solution. It is the unmanly servility of censorship, which ever is limited to the controlling hands of Jewish interests. Our interests never need a mask. Theirs do. Do not give it to them. You cannot lay to rest,an active, opportunistic enemy as has been urged. Silence is a well traveled fast lane to defeat.

Thank you,

BBG, I suggest you read the whole discussion and how it led to my comments.