Forgive the lecturing tone of this piece; I wrote this as a reminder to MYSELF. I don’t see experienced BUGsters doing what I describe; but it might help new people coming aboard to understand the mission.
Why are the Anti-Whites attempting to commit genocide against my people? What is the motivation of Anti-Whites? Is it hate? Is it some pathology or some unknown genetic trait that scientists haven’t yet discovered? I would like to suggest an approach to this question when doing Mantra work:
DON’T OBSESS ABOUT IT.
Why do I need to understand why someone is committing genocide against my race? What’s really important is that it is happening. Everyone knows genocide is evil. There can be a hundred motives for an Anti-White: hate, greed, and things we won’t ever understand. Illuminati, Jewish grudges or the Royal family. But getting off into the swamp of “root causes” is a strategy for getting stuck in quicksand; especially when doing Mantra work.
There will come a time, after our victory is in progress, when it may be useful to focus on what makes Anti-Whites tick, because endless speculation about the psychology of an Anti-White would make a fine series of university courses someday. I would like to see degrees granted in White Genocide Studies. But that is in the future when we will be trying to keep the Anti-White program of genocide forever dead, much like the plan Bob has for assuring there is money to be made by getting reparations for White Genocide and going after the pocketbooks of the grand-descendants of Anti-Whites.
We are not there yet. When doing Mantra work, it is far more effective to avoid speculation about Anti-White motives. You can ask an Anti-White things like, “Why are you justifying genocide?”, but let him wrestle with that question, not you. Every answer you give becomes a potential distraction – it becomes something the other side can argue about rather than facing the ongoing program of White Genocide.
#1 by Gavin on 08/31/2012 - 10:44 am
Sometimes I will be asked “Why are they doing this? What is their motive.”
I just respond that you have to ask the criminal why he committed the crime…not the victim.
#2 by steadiness on 08/31/2012 - 11:58 am
White anti-whites are politically correct, sanctimonious, and smarmy. When some of them go too far, they accuse each other of these things as well. They have exactly one set of ideas: the hierarchy of victimhood and the eschatology of social progress.
When an anti-white goes on his soap box and tells everyone how upstanding and moral he is, the only thing I used to be able to respond with was “thanks for the sanctimony” and “now you’ve covered your ass”. Now I know some even better things to say, like “you’re just saying that about white people, anti-racist is a code word for anti-white” and “you’re basically advocating for genocide”.
I think it’s important to throw key phrases like ‘sanctimonious’ and ‘eschatology of social progress’ at them, though. It demoralizes them individually, and if they’re hearing it from us, that makes it the words of the devil, so they can’t say it to each other.
#3 by Harumphty Dumpty on 08/31/2012 - 2:28 pm
“you’re basically advocating for genocide”
Except in special circumstances, I’d leave out the word “basically.” 🙂
“eschatology of social progress”
I really like that. We stick to Mantra, Mantra, pure Mantra, is our ideal, but in some long back and forths, like on youtube, one has to say SOME things that aren’t pure Mantra…but ALWAYS the posts should be constructed in a way that anything that isn’t Mantra is a lead-in to Mantra as the main point.
Saying some other things is necessary, it seems to me, but as Bob has said, anything at all you say that isn’t Mantra distracts from the Mantra.
But also, I post at a news site that won’t allow me to do straightforward Mantra unless I’m willing to spend all day with it and sacrifice 10 or 20 usernames. So most of the time I limit myself there to keeping up some of our Mantra phrases, and closely allied phrases like “the Church of PC” (one of my usernames there) which I’ve found opens a whole new arena of points that can be made.
So,
“The Church of PC with its eschatology of social progress….”
Yep, I can find a place for that! Thanks!
#4 by Jason on 08/31/2012 - 9:00 pm
Church of PC, funny. You know, I’ve been reading Bob’s book and PC really is a State Religion. I can mock Christians, Muslims and Mormons all day long and the gov’t doesn’t care. But if you stray from PC beliefs, you can lose your job (for legal reasons), lose your broadcast license and even be put in prison.
That is the power that no regular church has. People will look back on all this the way we view Puritans putting people in stockades.
#5 by Harumphty Dumpty on 08/31/2012 - 10:50 pm
“PC really is a State Religion.”
Absolutely, and I say that whenever there’s a discussion about separation of church and state.
Once Bob put the idea in my head of PC not being LIKE a religion (my former idea), but BEING a religion, things I had perceived vaguely took on a stark clarity.
For one, you can’t argue a person out of their religious beliefs.
You have to just move in in force and erect your own church on top of their own and let them grow accustomed to the new gods!
#6 by elcyCesreveR on 09/01/2012 - 9:10 am
I think it really is important to inject the terminology of PC being a religion. It is faith based dogmatic with a deity (collective) which defines morality.
When the PC police bring up separating church and state, what they are really talking about is replacing Christianity with their surrogate religion.
For a few years before visiting this site, I was stating that PC WAS a religion. When I arrived here I was comforted by seeing that I wasn’t alone in this. Bob seems to be one hell of an innovator.. I was listening to a podcast of his called “Idiocracy”, a movie about dysgenics was released a year after by the same name… I think he got the title from Bob
#7 by shari on 08/31/2012 - 12:29 pm
I tried using sarcasm on someone who says race replacement is better than saying GENOCIDE. It’s not.
http://age-of-treason.blogspot.com/2012/08/decoding-racial-political-discourse.html?showComment=1346413076021#comment-c5951985346113077075
#8 by Harumphty Dumpty on 08/31/2012 - 10:42 pm
I read a lot of that thread. That guy you replied to will never see the light!
#9 by Simmons on 08/31/2012 - 1:15 pm
Well said Jason.
When you advance it might pay to know somewhat about their psycho makeup, and for that I actually reference Jared Taylor’s review of a book about pathological altruism by the same name in this month’s CofCC Informer.
Its a cult that drags in the weak via guilt and shame and some weak promises of utopia.
We are destroying their moral framework causing them to over react. The rest of the “Right” quibbles the facts.
#10 by Harumphty Dumpty on 08/31/2012 - 2:01 pm
Yes, the anti-white cult is the new morality for the last several decades. We tell them instead that they’re moral slimebags.
#11 by Harumphty Dumpty on 08/31/2012 - 1:52 pm
Nice job, Jason. I hope you’ll post it also on the newcomers’ thread,
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/topic/are-you-new-to-bugs-swarm/page/7/
Whites become anti-white because humans believe what they are told over and over.
At least we hope so, right? 🙂
#12 by Sentinel on 08/31/2012 - 2:13 pm
Anti-White spiders like to weave big, sticky webs for BUGS.
Deliver the message and fly right around ’em.
🙂
#13 by Cleric Preston on 08/31/2012 - 6:10 pm
Jason, good article
About keeping to the main point ie Genocide, I am experimenting with whenever I get a response from an Anti-White on y/t I start my comment with
“The attempt to destroy, in whole or in part, EVERY White country through 3rd World immigration and ‘assimilation’ is GENOCIDE”
Then I’ll type my short remark and finish with anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.
Up till a few days ago I was putting my short cutting comment first and finishing with “The attempt to destroy, ………”
I think this could be more effective. I’ve noticed that if I have the Genocide comment at the end Anti-Whites focus on respoding to my short comment,and ignore the issue of Genocide.
This way they have GENOCIDE in their face at the top, and makes everything else a side issue.
I’ll let everyone know the results, if anyone has any thoughts on it, feel free to sound off.
H.D I’m going to use ‘Church of P.C’ as appropiate, nice terminology there 🙂
(Interesting possibility on ‘Anti-White psychology’ course at university. If Homosexuality can be dropped as a mental illness, then Anti-White could be deemed a mental illness. Might be work available as a rehab councillor…..)
#14 by Harumphty Dumpty on 08/31/2012 - 11:04 pm
“The attempt to destroy, in whole or in part, EVERY White country through 3rd World immigration and ‘assimilation’ is GENOCIDE”
I really like that as a lead-off statement. Also I think it might occasionally pass the censors at a news site I’m obsessed with. I’ll definitely try it out.
#15 by Jason on 08/31/2012 - 8:38 pm
Are we allowed to repost articles from this site, to other sites? There have been some I would like to post as comments over on TOO. There may be a few Reachable Whites over there.
#16 by Harumphty Dumpty on 08/31/2012 - 11:06 pm
I can’t imagine there would be any objection.
#17 by Truck Roy on 08/31/2012 - 9:30 pm
Good post.