B. U. G. S.

Johnny,
Those are too short and are not extremely useful.
I’ve already made short mantras out of the mantras that are available to me (in French, Italian, Spanish, German, and one or two others).
I need the mantra in some other European languages (not just in Western European ones such as French, German, etc.).

Could you provide me the link to your video?

I’ve been capitalizing “White” for “White people”, “White children” and “White Genocide”.

I’ve been using lower case “white” for “white countries” and “anti-white”. I don’t think we need to bring attention to “White countries” much. And I think that “anti-white” simply looks cleaner and neater than “anti-White”.

“Diversity” means chasing down Every Last White Person.

The program of “Diversity” in EVERY white country and ONLY in white countries will continue until there are no White children left.

“Diversity” is a code word for White Genocide.

Mike, I can help you post French minis once you’ve translated them.

As for the moderated comments, I have two questions:

1. Are the comments sent into moderation automatically or can they stay up there for some time before a moderator checks them? I ask because if we can still get them up and avoid bans we can do some damage. And even if we get ip bans, there are ways around that.

2. Are there any other highly visited news sites that aren’t so heavily moderated?

We’ll also have to find popular French youtube channels and keep hitting them over and over again.

Hi Mike.

Like Jason and Squirrel and others, I think you should spend at least a year learning how to deal with anti-whites online before weighing up whether you want to go public.

Does anyone know of any non-English speaking websites where the comments aren’t pre-moderated to post on?

Don’t bother discussing genotypes, or any of those details about Taiwan or Japan – it’s totally pointless.

Use what AnotherOne or what I said. Keep it short and simple. You’re making your point. This might not mean much to you at the moment because you’re so used to “arguing.”

Picture being a child and calling some other kid names and using certain phrases to mock them. That’s what you’re meant to be doing here. You’re just repeating points and trying to humiliate your opponent.

These guys responding to you are focusing on insignificant details and it’s possible that it may appear as if they’re somehow winning a big argument. You have to do the same back – repeating phrases and name calling is the answer.

I meant that by only focusing on one aspect out of many aspects of his post, that will frustrate him, and he’s not going to bother saying “Why don’t you respond to this or that?”

Another point: Fighting fire with fire is great because it usually gets you into stalemates very quickly which is what you want.

Many times I get anti-whites asking me this kind of question: “Why is being White so important to you?” You can bring this to a stalemate (in the sense that the discussion goes absolutely no where after this point) by saying: “Anti-white, you clearly have a problem with White people surviving into the future. It’s White Genocide.” I’ve never seen them respond with anything else other than the same thing they replied with previously. At this point the anti-white has just made himself look incredibly stupid in front of the audience because he has no way of countering the point I’m making that he has a problem with White people surviving into the future. I’m sure the most intelligent anti-whites could create something to get out of it, but I’ve not yet come across it, nor do I think I wouldn’t be able to to re-counter it.

PWR, I can probably help out.