Search? Click Here
Did you know you can visit to the swarm with www.bugsswarm.com?
Post on the internet Working Thread

Benjamin Newells

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 257 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    Are you fucking shitting me? Is there any corner of YouTube you have not spread your cancerous ideology? I see you people literally on every type of video possible.

    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    Why do so called “anti-racists” only combat “White Privilege” in White countries?

    Why do they not combat Asian Privilege in Asia, Hispanic Privilege in Mexico, Black Privilege in Africa, Indian Privilege in India, etc?

    Secret Squirrel, you obviously didn’t even read my topic otherwise you wouldn’t have posted this “mini-mantra”. This first one which you posted is not a mantra at all. “Anti-racists” don’t say there is Asian privilege in Asian countries or Black privilege in Black countries. It’s akin to saying “Why do they not combat Asian racism in Asian countries, Black racism in Black countries…”

    The RACE problem and the PRIVILEGE problem only exist in White countries. That is a vital point in the mantra. This mini-mantra you posted violates the mantra. It’s actually not a mantra.

    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    No person who has thousands or even hundreds of hours of experience in using the mantra will agree with you j p.

    You have very little experience in using the mantra out in the battlefield. You haven’t debated anti-whites. You haven’t got the feeling for what works and what doesn’t. You probably don’t even understand or appreciate the underlying method and aspects of how to interrogate and break an anti-white in the field.

    Continuing this topic is a waste of time. Go post the mantra and mini-mantras and report back the logs of your interrogations of the anti-whites.

    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    j p, we don’t do discussions. We do propaganda. We use repeater terms (anti-white) and slogans to beat our opponents into the ground. It’s psychological warfare. We’re manipulating and taking control of the social situation. Peer pressure is power. It’s the only thing that works.

    If you have doubts about the mantra and our methods and approach, then I suggest you take the time to read Bob’s articles and absorb his thinking. Otherwise you can go to stormfront and play WN SimCity to your heart’s content. Discussions about policy will come when the public acknowledges White Genocide.

    Anyone who says ‘America should remain non-White’ or ‘It’s too hard to deport all the non-Whites’ is taking our energy and weakening our public image out in the battlefield – even if they acknowledge White Genocide. But since you have no experience out in the field you might not appreciate nor even understand this.

    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    But my point is, to take the stance “there should be white countries, but not ALL white countries should remain white countries” is not necessarily a statement promoting white genocide.

    Yes it is.

    Turning just one White country non-White is an act of White Genocide.

    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    So you support the forced conditions intended to bring about the disappearance of White people in America yet you say that’s not #WhiteGenocide ?

    A positive answer to this question will reveal whether someone is an #antiwhite who supports #whitegenocide, or not.

    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    Henry, my friend, thanks for responding.

    If we include the term “mantra” above the mantra itself, I think it should say “White Genocide Mantra” or even “White Genocide Explained” rather than “The Mantra”.

    We could put it in small font (one or two sizes smaller than the rest of the main text on the website) and make it obvious that it’s not part of the news, but more like an introduction to the overall idea of the website.

    I’m not sure if practicality should be our main interest. The news updates still get spread by the pro-White community and in doing so still spread out to the masses. It’s not as if the body of text of the mantra will somehow make it extremely difficult for people to scroll down or navigate the website. Perhaps we could include a big heading “News” underneath the mantra text that makes it obvious that all the things beneath the “News” heading are actual news articles.

    Perhaps we could use a particular font that is really condensed (sort of like the font that’s use here at Bugs) and that would allow the mantra to be fit in quite comfortably towards the top.

    I’m looking at WGP right now and there’s wide gaps of space on both sides of the site. Perhaps we could make these gaps much smaller? That will allow us to fit the text of the mantra in more easily.

    in reply to: White Genocide Project are OFF-MESSAGE #100081
    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    Thanks for the replies guys. That clears it all up then.

    in reply to: The Paltalk Thread #100080
    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    Edited.

    in reply to: "Inflict" #100077
    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    I’ve always used “imposed” and “enforced”. I might try “inflict”. But saying that, I don’t think it’s a step up from “imposed”.

    in reply to: Mantra in the News #100057
    Benjamin Newells
    Participant
    in reply to: White Genocide Project are OFF-MESSAGE #100026
    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    bump

    in reply to: Nation vs. Country #99726
    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    The other day an anti-white said “I never denied White people exist” and in the same tweet he made a sick anti-white joke about inbreeding. So you can say:

    So you agree that White People/Race exists. You just make sick anti-white jokes that we are “inbred”?

    Whenever you get them to say “I never denied…”, then you switch to saying “So you agree that Whites exist” followed by “You just make sick anti-white jokes” or “You just blame White children for all the world’s problems, slavery, colonization”, etc.

    in reply to: Nation vs. Country #99725
    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    If the results show that “nation” is met with less resistance, then go with that. But anti-whites will find 1000s of excuses to justify White Genocide or deny it, so overall it doesn’t matter whether you use nation or country.

    When they deny White countries/nations exist, it’s best to deal with them with rhetorical points.

    “Of course White nations/countries exist. You anti-whites like to play sick games when #WhiteGenocide is brought up, don’t you?”

    I thought of this one just now: “Denying White countries exist is also like denying White people exist – just another anti-white excuse to carry out #WhiteGenocide”

    When someone denies that White people exist (“one race”, “bleed red”, etc.), it’s very easy to deal with it.

    “Denying that White People exist is dehumanization. Denying a RACE exists is genocide under UN Law.”

    “White people don’t exist, yet you blame White babies for colonization/slavery of non-Whites?”

    And so on.

    You could merge the two concepts of “denying White people exist” and “denying White nations exist” into one to make it more powerful:

    You anti-whites go full retard when #WhiteGenocide is brought up: “What’s a White country? What’s a White Person? I don’t know what dat is. duuuuhhhhh”. And then you blame White children for all the world’s problems. #antiwhite sociopaths

    in reply to: Mantra in the News #99148
    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/mcdonalds-something-for-everyone-to-love-billboard-to-replace-white-genocide-sign-in-ak-town/

    The sign contains part of what is called “The Mantra,” an argument attributed to former Reagan appointee Bob Whitaker in which he allegedly stated that, “They say they are anti-racist. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

    in reply to: Dismantling The White Privilege Meme #99139
    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    jo3w,

    I probably overreacted and jumped to conclusions. Well try it. Maybe try “anti-white non-whites” as well.

    in reply to: Dismantling The White Privilege Meme #99122
    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    Wrong jo3w. Wrong.

    You never make the focus on non-whites. It’s all about the anti-whites whether non-white or white.

    It’s just hit me that we have at least ten people here at bugs who actually don’t know what they are doing. They also tend to be the people who never regularly posted their links. And because they never posted their links, the better swarmers aren’t able to CORRECT them. Now these people have gotten into bad habits and think that what they are doing is correct when it is not.

    in reply to: Dear White People Movie – Just Released #99121
    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    @ j03w,

    Keep the focus on anti-whites, not on non-whites.

    in reply to: Dismantling The White Privilege Meme #99113
    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    @ Carloman,

    I agree that each ethnic group or race should be privileged in their own countries, but I just don’t think using that term “privilege” is a good way to attack our opponents and I don’t think it’s good to take any stance on “privilege” in general. It puts us on the defensive too much. We would be defending something (“White privilege”) that most people think is a bad thing. The association between the fantasy word “privilege” and the real word “privilege” would be too strong. If you really wanted to you would need a different term to express the concept of “privilege”, of course. But I think we always need to be on the offensive, and not on the defensive any way.

    We need to always be on the offensive – starting out with a great mini-mantra and then any anti-white response is matched with manipulating what your opponent says to make them look bad. The mini-mantra does most of the work. An aggressive, rhetorical response is there to show the audience how sick the anti-whites are and they should never be treated with dignity. We need to be gritty. And I don’t think defending against the accusation of “denying White privilege” is any where near as effective as using those other lines. I think you should try those other lines out and see how you go.

    EDIT: My apologies if my thoughts seem to be all over the place.

    in reply to: Dismantling The White Privilege Meme #99073
    Benjamin Newells
    Participant

    “White Privilege” isn’t a concept that should be taken seriously. It shouldn’t be dealt with with any kind of serious explanation. As soon as you do that you give it credibility. It is still somewhat effective but should only be done by a Douglas Murry who ONLY does it because he can’t say “White Genocide”.

    When anti-whites talk about “White privilege” they are not talking about a real thing. It’s one of their fairytale concepts just like “racism” and “diversity”. “Fighting White Privilege” is conceptually very similar to “racism” and “diversity”. “Racism” is a code word for a White person who opposes White Genocide. “Diversity” is a code word for White Genocide. “Fighting White privilege” is a code word for White Genocide.

    Carloman, when you say that there is Black privilege in Black countries or Asian privilege in Asian countries, it is EXACTLY like saying there is “Black racism towards non-blacks in Black countries, Asian racism towards non-asians in Asian countries and that, because of this, White racism is justified against non-whites in White countries”. You would NEVER say that because you would be giving credibility to the word “racism” and that is not the argument the mantra makes. The mantra avoids giving credibility to the word “racist” at all costs. We need memes that avoid giving credibility to the anti-white meme “White privilege” and your memes do not do that.

    EDIT: What does everyone think about: “Fighting White Privilege is a code word for White Genocide”?

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 257 total)