B. U. G. S.

j p, we don’t do discussions. We do propaganda. We use repeater terms (anti-white) and slogans to beat our opponents into the ground. It’s psychological warfare. We’re manipulating and taking control of the social situation. Peer pressure is power. It’s the only thing that works.

If you have doubts about the mantra and our methods and approach, then I suggest you take the time to read Bob’s articles and absorb his thinking. Otherwise you can go to stormfront and play WN SimCity to your heart’s content. Discussions about policy will come when the public acknowledges White Genocide.

Anyone who says ‘America should remain non-White’ or ‘It’s too hard to deport all the non-Whites’ is taking our energy and weakening our public image out in the battlefield – even if they acknowledge White Genocide. But since you have no experience out in the field you might not appreciate nor even understand this.

So you support the forced conditions intended to bring about the disappearance of White people in America yet you say that’s not #WhiteGenocide ?

A positive answer to this question will reveal whether someone is an #antiwhite who supports #whitegenocide, or not.

I’ve always used “imposed” and “enforced”. I might try “inflict”. But saying that, I don’t think it’s a step up from “imposed”.

If the results show that “nation” is met with less resistance, then go with that. But anti-whites will find 1000s of excuses to justify White Genocide or deny it, so overall it doesn’t matter whether you use nation or country.

When they deny White countries/nations exist, it’s best to deal with them with rhetorical points.

“Of course White nations/countries exist. You anti-whites like to play sick games when #WhiteGenocide is brought up, don’t you?”

I thought of this one just now: “Denying White countries exist is also like denying White people exist – just another anti-white excuse to carry out #WhiteGenocide”

When someone denies that White people exist (“one race”, “bleed red”, etc.), it’s very easy to deal with it.

“Denying that White People exist is dehumanization. Denying a RACE exists is genocide under UN Law.”

“White people don’t exist, yet you blame White babies for colonization/slavery of non-Whites?”

And so on.

You could merge the two concepts of “denying White people exist” and “denying White nations exist” into one to make it more powerful:

You anti-whites go full retard when #WhiteGenocide is brought up: “What’s a White country? What’s a White Person? I don’t know what dat is. duuuuhhhhh”. And then you blame White children for all the world’s problems. #antiwhite sociopaths

jo3w,

I probably overreacted and jumped to conclusions. Well try it. Maybe try “anti-white non-whites” as well.

@ j03w,

Keep the focus on anti-whites, not on non-whites.

“White Privilege” isn’t a concept that should be taken seriously. It shouldn’t be dealt with with any kind of serious explanation. As soon as you do that you give it credibility. It is still somewhat effective but should only be done by a Douglas Murry who ONLY does it because he can’t say “White Genocide”.

When anti-whites talk about “White privilege” they are not talking about a real thing. It’s one of their fairytale concepts just like “racism” and “diversity”. “Fighting White Privilege” is conceptually very similar to “racism” and “diversity”. “Racism” is a code word for a White person who opposes White Genocide. “Diversity” is a code word for White Genocide. “Fighting White privilege” is a code word for White Genocide.

Carloman, when you say that there is Black privilege in Black countries or Asian privilege in Asian countries, it is EXACTLY like saying there is “Black racism towards non-blacks in Black countries, Asian racism towards non-asians in Asian countries and that, because of this, White racism is justified against non-whites in White countries”. You would NEVER say that because you would be giving credibility to the word “racism” and that is not the argument the mantra makes. The mantra avoids giving credibility to the word “racist” at all costs. We need memes that avoid giving credibility to the anti-white meme “White privilege” and your memes do not do that.

EDIT: What does everyone think about: “Fighting White Privilege is a code word for White Genocide”?