Lord Nelson wrote:
-”Ask the questions! —-> Take control!”

Sun Tzu wrote:
-”Hence that general is skillful in attack whose opponent does not know what to defend”
-”You can ensure the safety of your defense if you only hold positions that cannot be attacked.”

We know the anti whites always change their arguments when they run into mantra thinking. But did we ever think about what that actually means? What does it say about the anti white argument when he or she decides to ABANDON an argument?

Does it not imply that they what to abandon a BAD argument (ALL argument for genocide are of course bad, but some are more easily exposed than others). In military terms, would this not relate to an army retreating to take up a better position elsewhere?

RETREAT IS ADMISSION.

-”You can ensure the safety of your defense if you only hold positions that cannot be attacked.”

So what would Sun Tzu advice us to do with an enemy who wants to retreat from a bad position? Sun Tzu would probably say: “BOX HIM IN”. If the enemy is uncomfortable where he is, forcing him to stay put will destroy his moral.

If the anti whites plays the “slavery card”, BOX HIM IN. Never let him leave for other arguments of being anti white. Rip him apart with question:

“Why are you deliberately neglecting ALL other slavery in world history to make Whites look more evil than others?”
“Why are you deliberately neglecting ALL other slavery in world history to make Whites look more evil than others?”
“Why are you deliberately neglecting ALL other slavery in world history to make Whites look more evil than others?”
“Why are you deliberately neglecting ALL other slavery in world history to make Whites look more evil than others?”