Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Keep It Up!

Posted by Bob on August 28th, 2012 under Coaching Session

My comments on comments on Horus’ article and its repeat have gotten long enough to make into at least an article in itself.

Horus says that Little BUGsers are shooting up all over the place and are beginning to eat their creator.

If he means that the way I take it, it is the outcome I have dreamed of since 1998.

It means I do not need to preside over getting our ideas out. You grab ’em and run with ’em.

It makes me very, very happy just to sit and watch you go at it.

In one set of comments, a commenter tried to make it clear that they really ARE out to get us, little tiny BUGSer and our runaway concepts. He put together the efforts that have been made and by whom to show that they are mobilizing specifically against the BUGS’ teams at a large scale professional level.

And they never mention BUGS.

The commenter was probably a bit irritated at how others did not realize how important this is.

I know the feeling.

I have told you dozens of timers how I was instrumental in bringing the USSR down and the Space Telescope up and such things. These are either wildly huge claims or you wonder why others got the attention.

Now you see the fight I have been in for decades.

The enemy knows damned well how good I am at this. Our side, like respectable conservatives, are clueless about that.

I also had no idea how much the petition to Putin has thrown the other side. Well, to put first things first, I had no idea it had taken off at all. When I proposed it we got a few comments about it so I went on to other ideas.

But I see now that people are grabbing our good ideas and running with them.

Normally when I have had a suggestion over the last half century, several people might say, “Why doesn’t somebody…,” so I fed my stuff very professionally through my articles read in politically professional circles and made sure they weren’t tainted with my name, so they came out in national columns a few months later.

It is a new and wonderful feeling, after decades of finding ways to sneak intelligent ideas past conservatives to find people grabbing my stuff and running with it.

Shoot ‘em, six gun!

  1. #1 by Gavin on 08/28/2012 - 2:54 pm

    Complaints about the BUGS conspiracy have started popping up.

    Apparently some anti-Whites have discovered the BUGS section on Stormfront and are now EXPOSING our little group of conspirators.

  2. #2 by WW on 08/28/2012 - 3:09 pm

    I already read your book, Bob. It was really good.

  3. #3 by steadiness on 08/28/2012 - 3:13 pm

    LOL, where are they talking about Swarmfront? They should talk about BUGS, the other crap on Stormfront is a colossal embarrassment to the pro-white community.

  4. #4 by cecilhenry on 08/28/2012 - 5:55 pm

    Glad to see you’re back and up and running Bob.

    The website was down for a few days and I was left wondering if someone might be trying to attack BUGS.

  5. #5 by Jason on 08/28/2012 - 9:54 pm

    For what it’s worth, I can feel something is different. It’s that feeling you get just before something gets really big. Pro-Whites always talked in nonproductive way until now. Suddenly, we are FRAMING the issue, and the other side is caught flat-footed. You guys figured out how to take command of the issue and talk about it in your own terms. You (we) are asking the questions. THEY are on the defensive.

    The old conventional politics is over, this is the last election to take place under the old paradigm. We are on the verge of big changes in the political landscape, but we all have to keep PUSHING and POSTING.

    Sorry for the rah-rah speech, I just feel pumped.

  6. #6 by BGLass on 08/29/2012 - 9:32 am

    @ ‘….Suddenly, we are FRAMING the issue, and the other side is caught flat-footed….’

    Unsure how people feel about divide and conquer where there is no “other side,” per se, and not just “one” other side.

    Like, when you start arguments about who is MOST GeNocided, instead of “whether one is being GeNocided or not.” (That’s a yes or no dead end.)

    E.g., I think wasps are and have always been the only target of GeNocide in the u.s., and can offer my “proofs.” Then somebody says, that’s total B.S. you ass-blank, their more historical populations weren’t even affected by “de-industrialization!” Yeah, ok, but what about de-colonization, you freak…” etc.

    Now, this argument between white people can just go on and on, no synthesis, for onlookers, but assumes and disseminates genocide is obvious, and everyone already knows that, or could wind up at a synthesis: like, well, we are both GeNocided!—but with a different strategy, omg!” (bonding over joint grievance)

    So the audience doesn’t even get to contemplate whether OR NOT Genocide is real, or happening, or too harsh a term, etc, etc. (which seem to be questions coming up with it). The underlying assumption of the presented “debate” / argument is that genocide is obvious, but it’s just an argument about who is genocided THE MOST. (And unless you want to be caught holding the bag, you’d better “weigh in” b/c Genocide could lead to lots of money payouts.)

    In other words, controlled opposition. You can demean others for using it, but it does WORK, especially if the argument is done in a team of two or three, like “pundits” on t.v. In fact, it’s ALL they do on t.v. Like imagine: the pundit panel discussing some aspect of white genocide (like when it started, or who was most affected, or which films and media specifically most contributed; i.e. topic: “In your opinion, what’s the one film that most contributed to White genocide? ).

    Framing a debate seems less about “does it exist or not,” but rather assumes it exists, then moves onto arguing about all its various aspects?

    The usual objection to that is that owning all sides is dishonorable strategy, and it could cause white “disunity” and infighting, but bugs may differ in this regard. The trick being that “disunity” is known and managed for the larger goal (dissemating “white genocide”) —and examining the genocide in all its aspects, not even allowing the question of “whether it is real” or “too strong a term.”

    This doesn’t allow the opposition any voice at all— they must take a side WITHIN your paradigm of “white genocide” with nowhere else for them to go. (That’s imo, more “framing the debate.” where your own idea is untouchable, and people can only “take sides” within what you believe and are putting out.)

  7. #7 by Simmons on 08/29/2012 - 10:35 am

    Be nice if a link to said petition were posted. I mention it in a post at taki mag. The constant drum beat of the left’s word “racist” is in itself a crime in many countries because it is singling out a group like that is explicity against their laws. I would gather that in the USA the left is bumping up against the civil rights laws as well with their use of the word “racist.” Anyway I mention the petition, what ever it is.

  8. #10 by Bob on 08/29/2012 - 4:43 pm

    Thanks, Jason. I think you’re right.

Comments are closed.