Dave says:

“And noticing what is compulsory is Mantra thinking.”

Thanks, Dave.

Yes! Noticing where they are coming from is how one wins with Mantra Thinking.

I had just written a piece on the same subject, or what to MY mind is the same subject. I decided that no one would understand my point.

Well, courtesy of Dave, I’ll try it:

Bullshitters and Tape Recorders

Anti-WHITES are divided into two groups:

1) The ones who just recite Mommy Professor, and

2) The ones who are reciting bullshit and they know it’s bullshit.

You will note that when I go after an anti-WHITE in OV he is obviously outclassed.

Forty-five years ago when I was a grad student at the University of Virginia, it was a standing joke at parties when a student or professor would hear that I was a racist and would come over to me to straighten me out. People would watch them come over to me and watch me cut them down.

They enjoyed watching it because I had cut most of THEM down the same way. It became fascinating to them. As one prof said, “What is interesting is to watch how the time it takes you goes down. It took you five or ten minutes when you got here, now they start backing away in two or three minutes.”

My secret, then as now, was simply knowing that anti-WHITES come in two groups:

1) The ones who just recite Mommy Professor and

2) The ones who are reciting bullshit and they know it’s bullshit.

So I made Group feel like the Mommy Professor Tape Recorders they are, and I cut through the BS in Group 2.

It ALWAYS worked. It always WORKS.

There is a magazine called Maxim.  On the cover of each issue is a mixed-blood woman.   I got it in the mail for two separate one-year subscriptions, neither of which I ordered.

I must begin by disillusioning you. Kind folks may respond by saying to themselves, “OF COURSE a good Bible Belter like Bob would not order PORN.”  As usual, just when somebody thinks I’m a good boy, I have to disavow it. 

“BROTHERS,” you may expect me to say with tears in my eyes, “I have SINNED!”

Sorry.

After my divorce twenty-five years ago, the Playboy Channel cost twelve dollars a month, and I subscribed to it.  I LIKE looking at good-looking mostly blonde women.  If this is sinful I can only say that The Lord forgot to neuter me.

No one EVER sent me a FREE subscription to Playboy.   You would play hell trying to get a 24-hour Playboy Channel at an affordable price today.  IN SHORT I doubt seriously that Maxim, which is now the Media’s official benchmark of ”ideal women,” pays its own way.

This is important.  But since most people will obsess on porno itself, my point will be missed.   Which is exactly what anti-WHITES depend on.  I am not big on conspiracies, but I do know that the superrich are generally anti-WHITE.  For a few million dollars, the girly magazine of record can be made into a monthly ad for Affirmative Action Beauty.

I have seen news commentaries showing Maxim covers as Ideal Women.

I saw the Microsoft ads with Politically Correct people bragging they were “PC,” With Bill Gates grinning on screen.

This is how smart people fight for power.  But if I try to alert our people to it, there will be SFers telling me I am praising Hugh Hefner.

Dave said that I pick the wrong examples.  That happens, but the simple fact is that there ARE no examples our people will NOT obsess on.  It is like being tripped up constantly.  I write a piece on Maxim and get response that tell me Hugh Hefner is bad.  I write about how to fight, and got responses saying commenters are Good Christians or are in a macho mood or are feeling depressed.

Since I did the last piece and everybody decided to go off on their own subject, I can use BUGS as just the place of record for my meanderings.

OUR universe — there is no reason to call it THE universe — is supposed to be expanding at an increasing rate.  If it is to maintain a certain rate of increase in three dimensions, it would have to expand at an expanding rate.   The equal and opposite reaction to that might be gravity.

As far as I know, all this is still based on the red shift.  Like the strong force in the atom, a force can exist which doesn’t obey the distance squared law.  It may be that the red shift is different at a distance or there are curves in space we don’t know about yet which produce the apparent red shift.

This is a comment on your comments.  My mind can wander, too.

Everything here relates. I have written before about how everyone is shocked if I know some detail of the latest news everybody is talking about, but they are equally shocked if I remember the same detail a month later. By then, they’ve forgotten all about THAT Big News Story.

The same is true of history. It is grudgingly admitted that the coded language in Revelations might have something to do with Nero. Which is exactly like saying that a Christian document written in a world ruled by Stalin might have some reference to Uncle Joe.

But I have had people tell me in earnest in the 1960s that John was actually talking not about Nero, but about the Cuban Missile Crisis, while in 2001 he was referring to the Twin Towers.

In all but intent, this is the Big Lie technique. The big difference is that these people are lying to THEMSELVES. As I said before, most people can’t remember what news they were obsessed with six months ago. You can tell about what year a history book was written, which means is not a good history. A historian can either get published or discuss real history.

It is the same with past, present, and future. I keep repeating that it matters not [at] all whether a futurologist predicts correctly. He is getting published NOW. He is an official futurologist because he is getting grants NOW. The more provincially NOW he is the better.

Which is why [some] of the most entertaining humor you will ever read consist[s] of the confident predictions of Experts. Historians are the same about yesterday. News commentators forget everything before they comment. They have to have something for TONIGHT, and everything in history and all in future has to be related to NOW.

You cannot understand history or the future if you do not keep Temporal Provincialism firmly in mind at all times. If you do, it gives you a huge understanding denied the “professionals.”

Almost everybody who has known me for a while considers my predictions correct to the point of being creepy, even ones I had forgotten until they mentioned them. But the secret is simple: Look at history as if you were in THAT time. Look at the future not in terms of what might seem plausible now, but beyond the welter of Latest News.

Bob,
I took your advice and picked up a few W.E. Woodward books. You’re right, they are good. If you ever think of any more good books, I’d be interested.
Happy New Year!
Bruce

Woodward is a special, but in general history written in the 30s is always a good bet. That was when history books were best-sellers aimed at a general audience of literate Americans.  Now history books are all written for Harvard.