B. U. G. S.

“The problem with The Mantra is that, while it is technically true, it may possibly be flawed. The key flaw lies in the categorization of “white countries”. Firstly, it begs the question—what about native americans and Australian aborigines and the Maori of New Zealand? Like whites, they also have no countries. Africa for the Africans and Asia for the Asians is a solid, indisputable premise. But the problem is, when it comes to white countries, only Europe is our indigenous homeland in the way that Africa is for the Africans, and Asia for the Asians.”

The question of whether Australia, USA etc, etc are White countries or not is SILLY !

In all my years I have never seen even the most inept Stormfronter attempt to tell Anti-Whites in Opposing Views that “The ‘holocaust’ was permissible because Nazi Germany was never a Jewish country”

That’s the reasoning Anti-Whites are using when they argue White Genocide is Ok in CERTAIN locations because it’s ‘not a White country’.

How would an Anti-White respond if confronted with the statement “The holocaust was permissible because Nazi Germany was never a Jewish country”

That’s a clue on what our response should be like when Anti-Whites try to justify our Genocide in certain locations because “it wasn’t a White country”.

Do you guys see how SILLY this all is ?
If you’re a Jew-aholic maybe say “The USA was never a Black country would that make Genocide of Blacks in USA permissible ?”

How about this,
“Australia was never an African country does that mean Genocide of Africans in Australia is Ok ?”

New Zealand was never an Asian country, does that mean Genocide of Asians in New Zealand is Ok ?”

I’m heading back to the field.

In the past I responded to the ‘list of names’ by stating
“It is nearly 70 years since WW2 ended and investigations into the holocaust are still continuing. There will be plenty of time to fully investigate and claim reparations from all Anti-Whites involved AFTER White Genocide has been stopped”

That’s true, but it’s too defensive. A more aggressive response would be

“Good, now we are getting somewhere. You admit White Genocide is occurring. The attempt to destroy EVERY White country through 3rd World immigration and ‘assimilation’ is GENOCIDE
‘anti-racist’ is a codeword for Anti-White.

As Secret Squirrel said we are not trying to convert any Anti-Whites, our audience is the people who are reading or watching the exchange.

@ Carloman, ” I think his next question would have been, “And what are you planning on doing to those people? Putting them on trial? Killing them?”

Our response to ‘what are you going to gas the Anti-Whites ?’ sort of questions regarding longer term plans is.

(1) The Anti-Whites involved will be liable to pay reparations.
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2013/08/13/reparations-not-tribunals/

I think the following has been discussed as well but I can’t find a link.
(2) Just as affirmative action programs were established to help Blacks in USA overcome the effects of slavery, so too will affirmative action programs be implemented to help White people overcome the effects of White Genocide.
As Genocide is infinitely worse than slavery the affirmative action program to help White people will naturally be infinitely more extensive than current affirmative action programs to help Black people.

Banning human emotion is Anti-White

I’ve called businesses on the phone and told them their advertising is Anti-White and promotes White Genocide. It’s just another method of spreading the message and exposing people to the terminology.

Everybody knows who a White person is, just like they know who is Asian or Black or mixed.
Don’t even go down that rabbit hole, you’ll get tripped up everytime.

“Nobody asks Asians ‘what is an Asian’
Nobody asks Blacks ‘what is a Black’
ONLY White people asked such SILLY questions.
The attempt to destroy in whole or in part, EVERY White country through 3rd World immigration and ‘assimilation’ is GENOCIDE
‘Anti-racist’ is a codeword for Anti-White.”

“Who doesn’t Hate Genocide ?”

As a White Inferiorist can you explain WHY you believe White people are ‘inferior’ ?
These Anti-Whites with their belief in White Inferiority never give us proof as to WHY White people can’t survive on our own without non-Whites.
The attempt to destroy, in whole or in part, EVERY White country through 3rd World immigration and ‘assimilation’ is GENOCIDE
‘Anti-racist’ is a codeword for Anti-White

After constant exposure to the message those crazy people won’t seem quite as crazy anymore. This video was put up about a week ago.
Interest points are 2:23 (ARIACWFAW) as well as 3:22-3:34.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mM_wK3xLvNE

The background to this is I hammered her in the comments section of ‘Completely Lovely’s ‘ “White Pride March in Calgery” video back in March 2011, it made such an impact on her that a few days later unbeknown to me she put up a video in my honour, bagging out me and our Mantra, which I stumbled upon about a year ago.

It seems quite a huge change in attitude from her in just 2 1/2 years. Give it 2 1/2 more years and she’ll be protesting on the streets against White Genocide 😉

No need to go to the video and comment, she’s pregnant and doesn’t need the stress.

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews”

Jason, Can you tell me what you did on August 27, 2009 ?
If some one asked what I was doing August 27, 2009, there would be no way I could answer truthfully (unless I consulted a diary etc).

I can, and I’m sure everyone here can, however remember exactly what they were doing on September 11, 2001.
The reason for this is because memory is linked to emotion.
If somebody is having a strong emotional reaction and you can associate that experience with a message, then that message will be remembered.

The impact of the message in this case was increased due to the increased emotional reaction caused by NSM in Black uniforms. I accept the likely hood of it being a negative association at this time.
However will that association remain negative over the long term as the message is also spread through other mediums ?

In terms of sparking a public discussion any emotional response to the message is better then apathy.
Who is going to discuss anything that they feel nothing for, either positive OR negative ?