I am now getting the feedback I want: people USING my approach.

“This,” as I said below, “is the garden I want to make grow.”

They say that manure is the natural fertilizer.

I say a lot of good stuff, but not one reader here can deny that Bob’s Blog has provided enough h*****s**t to reawake the Sahara.

Someone asked me to repeat my e-mail address and I forgot to do so.

It’s bobw1830@yahoo.com

PeterGene can contaft me there.

PeterGene,

I just accepted the “Monitor” title on Stormfront, and Kelso was flatteringly grateful. He said my joining will get other “big names” to go in as monitors.

The idea that ***I*** give somebody some kind of respectability is a new experience for me.

But one of my active Bloggers has been banned from Stormfront.

I will be at the American Renaissance Conference later this week and I will talk to Kelso and Don Black about this. Is PeterGene your name on Stormfront?

No, don’t take your marbles and go home.

I don’t take my marbles and go home, but that is because I lost them a long time ago.

I am serious about you who take part in my seminar, so I would do this anyway and try to make peace. But in this case, it gives me an opportunity to find out exactly WHO does the banning on Stormfront and how they run it.

I know that the membership of SF took a huge jump after they got rid of one monitor who did too much banning. I like him, but when you run an organization, you have to impose impose discipline, often unfairly.

Kelso and Black get a lot of enemies that way, as did I. But if you concentrate on the abuse of power, you are NOT concentrating on the cause.

Every moment you spend concentrating on yourself is a moment you are NOT concentrating on our war.

So, PeterGene, send me your SF name at my address,
bobw1830@yahoo.com

and let me try to take it from there.

I know you are too ticked off right now to want reinstatement on SF, but I will try to make it your option.

But don’t just think about how ticked off you are. ***I*** need this opportunity to find out how SF works with a specific example. Kelso and Black know how seriously I take my Bloggers, so you can give me a real chance to ask what I need to ask.

Beautiful stuff Bob.

I like that sort of line and mentallity.

To change subject….

Well i really irritated the Jewish Masters of StromFront!

I have been Banned!

QUOTE

“Your account has been disabled for the following reason: 6 month ban – Egregiously violating every guideline & attacking Stormfront as well

Date your account will be reenabled: 08-20-2006, 12:30 AM”

UNQUOTE

Now Bob i AM proud of that! Can you understand that? I mean not the ban, but that i am proud of that.

What greater respect could they have paid me?

I love them for it!

I have been taken very seriously by THEM!

But the joke is i never took myself seriously at all!

Do you see?

Well, my victory is the correctnes of my prediction!

Few will know this!

I stood up againsts of load of Nazgool bastards. I have done so many times before.

I know it was not the politically correct thing to do Bob, but that exactly WAS MY intention.

You my despise me and hate me but you will never get a politically correct statement out of me!

You know what happens when you poke a stick into the ant’s nest?

Are you always politically correct Bob?

But 99% of the population at SF write infinitely more vile stuff than i ever wrote. Naive childish Stuff! I know because i have read it! They have written awefully stupid hateful and racist stuff such as i NEVER wrote.

For that reason i love my ban because it invalidates The Entire Stormfront Movement.

It is bereft of validity! But i would lie to you if i did not state that i knew this from the very beginning.

Were there is rot it must be exposed even it it harms oneself! That is not to say there are no good people there on StormFront who may be supported. Nor does it necessarily mean that the exposer of the rot is any good! It only means that when we find a terminal disease we have to cut deep – and yes it hurts. It hurts me too!

But i have proved the point that ALL forums are controlled by THE Jews. I have yet to find as forum that isn’t. Its scarey!

Stormfront would be shut down in an instant if it did not do servitude to the Jews!

The Jews allow it to opperate because it provides them with a counterfoil to justify their victim status. That means that certain mantras must be repeated there. Anything unusual is a danger to the Jews and also more functionally such unusualness horrifies the Dog Minded Racists who dwell at SF.

Don’t worry you won’t have to ban me from your forum.

I shall evaporite as a cloud on a Blue Spring Morn.

Respectfully

The feedback from my response to Derek on the length of Bob’s Mantra has been the garden I wish I knew how to nourish.

Derek, below, went on to state his method of dealing with this situation in actual arguments.

Tim has a terrific insight on real arguments.

There is at least one other I want to quote.

But right now, I need to make a point I have tried to make over and over and over: But I am tired and I won’t be here forever

I have spent a lot of time lately in the antis section of Stormfront. I demonstrate, again and again and again, that my points leave the antis gibbering.

That is the ONLY point of dealing with the opposition.

We have a war to fight. We have a point to make. Lately, by concentrating on the anti thread, I have begun to get my comrades into backing me up. But if I disappear, they will be back to arguing details.

Here Derek’s comment sparked a discussion of how YOU can use my points, how YOU can “stay on message.” I got some feedback from some of you who actually can give me pointers from ACTUAL USE of my points.

Derek explains here that he has to get in all in in segments. But the point is that he is finding a way to get it in.

THAT is what I am here for.

Derek, I can usually say something like, “Are we going to have a discussion or are you just going to go to pieces on me?” If the other person is not a hopeless nut, I can buy enough time to state Bob’s Mantra, completely. The, as Tim says, I simply will not get off it.

But always remember, I am not offering you a Wordism. I am not giving you a cookbook.

You have to do what Tim and Derek are doing, develope the approach that gives YOU the most yield.

And for God’s sake, PLEASE share your experiences with the rest of us here.

Once you get m y approach down, you are going to feel sorry for Ole Bob. YOU are going to spread this approach, and YOU are going to sigh with exasperation as YOUR pupils constantly veer back to the old stuff:

“The dog returns to its vomit, the pig returns to its mire, and the burnt fool’s bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the fire.”

Once you start backing them down and convincing people, you will the horrible frustration at others who simply cannot seem to understand the basics. All good teachers suffer that all the time.

But I am, slowly, making progress.

This is a seminar, not a lecture. You have outgrown your college education, even if you never had one.

I expect a lot of you.

I expect you to save my race.

Comment by TIM

The reason it is so effective is BECAUSE it is NOT short. If it were short no one would think about it. It forces folks to think about uncomfortable things. And dispossesion is very uncomfortable. If you start using the “BW lines”. You will find that people TRY to get off the subject. And that is the ultimate compliment! When a liberal tries to get off the subject —you have won. At first, I did not know what to do when someone immediately tries to get off the subject. Now it is like blood in the water for a shark. I just dig in and keep at them until I see fear and tears. I have seen it change people. You have to remember though. To go from reverse to drive —you first have to go throgh neutral. People always try to convince others. I have learned at a young age–that is a waste of my time. I am just a parot. We are pre revolution and Bob’s mantra is my revolutionary slogan. I just keep repeating it. In pre-revolution people look to those who are bold and show courage. Bob’s lines incorporates both these traits.

Comment by Derek

When talking with others about this issue so many get upset and angry that they won’t let you get in a word edgewise. I usually have to break it up and address it in different sections when someone brings up a point.

For instance: person A says to me “there is a race problem in America.”

I say “and in Europe and all white countries. Notice how there are no race problems in Asian countries. The race problem is the ‘white problem’ and it won’t be solved until we are bred out of existance.”

A:”But this means you are a racist. I am anti-racist.”

Me: “Anti-racist is a code for anti-white.”, etc, etc.

I guess my basic point is that if you can’t get it all out at once try and get as much out as you can, even in fragments. The more the better, but some is better than none. At least that is my opinion.

Discussig Bob’s Mantra * Mark says,

Bob, while your mantra is dead on target it is a tad cumbersome to get out. What would happen if you ccondensed your mantra and made it easier to recite in a shorter time frame — w/o losing any of it’s message? Perhaps more of the Stormfronters would begin using it then? Back in the 60’s the negroes were fond of repeating their mantra, “black is beautiful” and it instantly conveyed all the points they wanted conveyed.

MY REPLY:

“Black is beautiful” was not what liberals wanted to hear. Their aim was to get rid of Whitey. The idea that blacks had some sort of pride in being black was wht got a black president elected for the NAACP when all of its presidents had been black for sixty years after its founding in 1905.

I personally endorsed statements like “black is beautiful.” I see absolutely nothing wrong with blacks having some kind of pride instead of looking at themselves as a set of throwawy genes to make the white race brown, and I said so at the time. That’s why I found it so easy to get along with black militants like Stokely Carmichael.

But your basic point is about the length of Bob’s Mantra.

I do not think you can find a single short statement of the kind you are talking about that gives anybody a new view of a group they don’t already endorse.

I have found — and have tested this AGAIN on the antis on Stormfront — that those few paragraphs put the opposition, which has been carefully coached for YEARS in how “racists” are just evil people — totally on the defensive.

In his Essays, Montesquie pointed out that “If I had had more time I would have written less.”

When you really work at writing, when you rewrite, you find that you can make your ideas shorter and more obvious. I do that here all the time. I write a short piece that would fill tgwenty pages for anybody else. That’s because I did the work HERE, and I don’t large numbers of readers to go through twenty pages and then do the intellectual work themselves of trying to get what the point is.

Bob’s Mantra is, if anything, too short. That is its problem. People want to talk about huge tomes they have waded through. They simply cannot absorb the fact that people who have gotten paid lifetime salaries as Intellectuals and written acres of pages are just plain simply WRONG.

In Russia, Russians who reject Communism still think Lenin was a genius.

Why?

They hold their arms apart and say, “He wrote THIS many books!”

The average person wants a BOOK that says whatever it is.

If you nac boil Bob’s Mantra* down to an explanation three words long, I would welcome it.

I also cannot expand it to a book. A book gives the other side too many holes to crawl through. They can get off on any point in the book and avoid the fundamental, devastating, obvious point.

Bob’s Mantra has been tried.

It WORKS.

Galen’s Humor Theory of medicine killed tens of milllions. But it was in Latin, it was a part of the rediscovery of Classical Learning in the Renaissance. I have yet to find one single good hting that came out of the Renaissance.

Galen’s Theory never WORKED, but the entire academic medical community swore by it for centuries.

Taking pints of blood out of a sick person is insane, but it was standard treatment.

Genocide against whites is genocide.

Almost everybody says that Political Correctness has gone too far. Here is a statement that gies an example of that. It also gives every person who advocates “assimilation,” the required buzzword they all use today, on the defensive. It also shows that whites concerned about survival are not only not Nazis, they are the only decent people around.

The problem is that people got PAID for Galen’s Theory. They had to learn Latin for it and they were looked upon as Intellectuals. NOBODY got anything GOOD from opposing Galen.

Does this sound familiar?

USE Bob’s Mantra or MAKE something better.

But I am using Bob’s Mantra all by myself. It is a LOT of work and has been for years.

So I really don’t have time for theoretical discussions about it too.

I have spent a lot of time being told that “everybody” is the wrong word long before Joe brought it up here. Everybody has a different version, but they spend no time at all on USING it, they just want to discuss the theory of it.

They have every right to do that.

But Bob has serious work to do.

” Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”