Every time you let someone discuss “the races” instead of the Mantra, you lose.
No matter what a good reply you come up with, no matter how much the audience marvels at your wit, the subject has become “the mixing of THE races.” You have let people see the problem as race in general, not the obvious genocide of OUR race.
The White Mantra
“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
http://whitakeronline.org/
http://www.nationalsalvation.net/
#1 by Al Parker on 06/14/2007 - 2:26 pm
Our issue is not demonstrating that Jews are all-powerful… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not proving a conspiracy by an elite… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not explaining how rotten Israel is… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not liberals vs. conservatives… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not electing Ron Paul… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not opposing amnesty for illegal aliens… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not about moving to one place or another… it’s white survival.
You could add many more balloons to this list.
#2 by Lord Nelson on 06/14/2007 - 8:07 pm
Al Parker, well said.
I get so frustrated at seeing good people (not on this blog) trying to justify their right not to be ethnically cleansed from their own lands.
Its GENOCIDE folks. So ATTACK ATTACK!
#3 by Prometheus on 06/14/2007 - 9:37 pm
Its up to THEM to justify their actions.
They are the ones advocating a new nation, a multiracial nation.
They are the ones making the demands on our race.
They are the ones who seek to change the future of our children.
They are the ones who’s policies that we have to LIVE with.
Yet they make us justify our right to survive?
Whats worse, is we play along and then try to justify it!
Put the spotlight back on them, and make them answerable for their own ideas. Make them explain why they aren’t racist for essentially advocating the end of the white race.
If they say they do not support the idea that the white race should be mixed out, then show them how their words and ideas LEAD to that. Anti-racism is inheritly anti-white, and they struggle to demonstrate otherwise, even though they claim not to be.
It’s not the time for us to be apologetic and try to maintain a squeaky clean appearance in their eyes.
Now it times to make them grovel and crawl and force them to show us and everyone else they aren’t anti-white genocidalists.
With the right arguments, they crawl.
With enough pressure, they’ll grovel.
Have a look on SF and see how threads about IQ, crime, Jews have the anti’s just running our batting arguments here and there effortlessly.
Compare that to the threads like Lord Nelsons Anti Racist challenge, when is asking THEM to put forward an argument that doesn’t lead to genocide. They’re now starting to AVOID that thread and those arguments.
#4 by Mark on 06/14/2007 - 10:21 pm
How about a real quick alternative to the Mantra? Walk up to a black man with a white womand ask, “why are you trying to genocide my race through intermrriage? Don’t you realize that once the white race is exterminated you black people will starve to death?”
Well, you could ask this, provided you’re carrying a gun and not afraid of the black man you’re talking to.
#5 by AFKAN on 06/14/2007 - 10:51 pm
Quick tech update for Bob:
http://www.popsci.com/popsci/technology/b987485a9f492110vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html
Now, as to the issue at hand.
The Mantra also defines a pattern that works well with another meme, and that is “Racism is the new witchcraft.”
By this, of course, we mean that there is NO “acceptable” defense to the charge; like witches of several hundred years ago, we are NOT witches if we drown when a stone is placed on our chest as we are placed in the pond, and we ARE witches is we come to the surface – in which case, it is trial by fire.
Being rational with the irrational is simply a path to madness; don’t waste your time on trivial arguments. Just make the point, and wait until THEY are ready to discuss it.
In the meantime, keep moving FORWARD!
#6 by Al Parker on 06/14/2007 - 11:46 pm
A few more…
Our issue is not demonstrating that Jews are all-powerful… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not proving a conspiracy by an elite… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not explaining how rotten Israel is… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not liberals vs. conservatives… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not electing Ron Paul… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not opposing amnesty for illegal aliens… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not about moving from one place to another… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not the revival of nationalism in the West… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not about running around in jackboots… it’s white survival
Our issue is not revising the history of World War II… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not the latest tragedy committed against whites… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not whether or not Stalin was part Jewish… it’s white survival.
#7 by Al Parker on 06/15/2007 - 2:13 am
Oh, how about this one:
Our issue is not the Islamification of Europe… it’s white survival.
The subject of Islam in Europe is so DECEPTIVE. Too many people who talk about it are Zionists, religious nuts and anti-racist “conservatives” who care NOTHING for race.
#8 by Prometheus on 06/15/2007 - 3:22 am
Mark says:
How about a real quick alternative to the Mantra? Walk up to a black man with a white womand ask, “why are you trying to genocide my race through intermrriage? Don’t you realize that once the white race is exterminated you black people will starve to death?”
Well, you could ask this, provided you’re carrying a gun and not afraid of the black man you’re talking to.
ME:
Perhaps, but I think they are better used as an example to prove your point to others. I consider such couples lost causes.
#9 by Ian Santiago on 06/15/2007 - 6:47 am
I thought that I would offer up one of my favorite quotes:
“If a nation with a more advanced, more specialized, or in any way superior set of genes mingles with, instead of exterminating, an inferior tribe, then it commits racial suicide” Roger Pearson, Anthropologist
Also, the following article reaches the right conclusions, but with some typical do gooder Christian hand ringing.
http://www.antipasministries.com/html/file0000196.htm
Viva la Raza Blanca!!
#10 by Alan on 06/15/2007 - 9:14 am
The Mantra is short and sweet, it is based entirely on common sense and truth, it is not open for debate. In regards to open debate on race, it will always end with our side losing out. The left relies on pseudo science and wordism and out right deceit to spread their race mixing agenda, they have this racket down to a science thus, we must quote the mantra. The Mantra is our Kryptonite so to speak, it drains the life from the race traitors arguments, they hate the truth, we just present it to them with ease.
#11 by Prometheus on 06/15/2007 - 10:18 pm
When engaged in discussions involving the mantra concept, it helps to just repeat to yourself this
“I’m not here to win a debate. I’m here to make a point”
We are so used to debates being about winning and/or converting our opponent, that we forget why it is we are bringing up our point in the first place.
I have never seen a political debate on TV where one parliamentiarian tries to ‘convert’ another parliamentarian from an opposing party. So why take that approach when debating with antis?