I try to get used to being the only person alive who has a memory, but sometimes it gets a bit tiresome.
At least a dozen times people have told me HERE that they have never heard of “assimilation” as the cure to the race problem. Then they read about the English-Only Movement, which says that parents who don’t teach their children English prevent “assimilation.” “Assimilation” is discussed in almost every issue of National Review.
If you literature-searched “assimilation” in periodicals you would probably find entries coming in faster than you could read them
But when I use assimilation in the Mantra, it’s suddenly, “DUHH! Asimba WHO?”
This phenomenon is not new, and I’m ALMOST used to it.
The White Mantra
” It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
http://whitakeronline.org
http://www.nationalsalvation.net/
#1 by danerebor on 06/17/2007 - 12:38 pm
Multiculturalism counterracts ‘assimilation’. You cannot have proud non-whites and Borg at the same time, even if our enemies want all-brown Borg.
We should quietly support La Raza and press 2 for spanish, at least for now. The less they have in common with whites, the better.
All the damn mexicans across the street from me only have mexican friends. Thank God. My PC white neighbors hate that.
#2 by Prometheus on 06/17/2007 - 7:52 pm
Our liberal friends want us to accept the third world. People here fear of a divided community, a divided nation.
They say such problems wont happen.
For multiracialism not to end up as nations within a nation, it REQUIRES assimilation.
They oppose segregation within a nation. They say races should not be seperate.
Intermarriage displayed on TV is assimilation.
Adoption Angelina Jolie style, is assimilation.
Opposition of racial seperatism is a demand for assimilation.
One nation, united, but with many races, requires assimilation.
#3 by danerebor on 06/17/2007 - 9:28 pm
Encouraging developments. Sounds like Tonto is getting a little ornery!
“But the core reason for separatist graduations is the obvious one: on campus, assimilation is a hostile force, the domestic version of American imperialism. On many campuses, identity-group training begins with separate freshman orientation programs for nonwhites, who arrive earlier and are encouraged to bond before the first Caucasian freshmen arrive. Some schools have separate orientations for gays as well. Administrations tend to foster separatism by arguing that bias is everywhere, justifying double standards that favor identity groups.”
http://www.city-journal.org/html/eon2007-06-13jl.html
#4 by Sys Op on 06/18/2007 - 11:52 am
You’re playing into the dialectic word games here… Yes, that is a propaganda tactic.
Assimilation is NOT intermarriage. Assimilation is not sex and procreation.
That’s why the mantra is working.
That’s why owning definitions and debates works so well for those who are driving culture right now.
Only recently is behavior depicted by entertainment and news media moving toward intermarriage and sex — genetic procreation. That’s why people aren’t too worried about assimilation association and common language and neighborhood friendships — assimilation.
No, people have not been hearing what you are saying HERE for years. Bob, your memory is good on some things, but not others.
In South Carolina or Alabama, or Georgia, maybe that’s what people precisely stated in the media. But assimilation is not genetic procreation. That is why Lou Dobbs will not ever repeat the mantra, because the mantra is correct. That is why you spent time on it.
DUH MEN!