1. Mark says:
You know what’s scary, Bob? I find myself asking you a question, like about 911, or looking for an answer to a question on WOL and then, after reading your opinion I find myself saying, “Okay, Bob says such and such so the matter’s settled.”
I even caught myself telling my wife something about race or politics or something — I forget exactly — and my only argument to back it up was, “Well, hon, Bob Whitaker said so.”
I’m gonna’ have to go have my head examined….
18 June 2007, 11:07 pm [Edit]
2. Tom says:
Ole Bob is going to slap me for this, but it means you’re a whitakerite.
ME:
This is light-hearted stuff, but it gives me a chance to define again what Wordism is.
Mark, keep in mind that what I am doing here is either wild egotism or I’ve learned a LOT of things people need to know. Over fifty years of experience, thought and pain went into it.
If I didn’t think my advice was the best you can get, I wouldn’t be doing this.
Most of what I say without pay is correcting what bureaucracies have drummed into you FOR pay. I try to explain how those bureaucracies work, and they penetrate every part of your life.
Tom, there is nothing wrong with being a whitakerite if by that you mean you learn the tricks of the intellectual trade I have developed. I always welcome correction, which a Wordist will not tolerate.
All learning is not Wordism. All intellectual habits are not Wordist. For example, I keep explaining that Guilt pays MONEY, so teaching and communications bureaucracies naturally push guilt.
Mark may NOW be a whitakerist, small w, but he will DEVELOP his own markism. Only if he becomes a Whitakerist, capitalized, will things have gone too far. A Whitakerist would look in the Book of Bob for every answer all the way t Utopia as an unimpeachable source. A whitakerist thinks about it on his own and examines the source of ANY information to the point of psychoanalysis. He figures out WHY the source, including Bob, said that in the first place.
Somebody is spending money to publish or publicize it and we want to know WHY. To us, there is no “professional objectivity.”
And “peer review” means The Party Line.
Real whitakerism is simple truth fighting millions of Truths.
#1 by Lord Nelson on 06/19/2007 - 7:26 pm
I confess that I am also, a (w)hitakerist, and ‘PROUD’ of it.
7 WORDS!
#2 by Al Parker on 06/20/2007 - 12:26 pm
I cannot be a proper whitakerist because I do not yet see the trueness in all these truths. For example, if “OUR Posterity” can include an adopted posterity, where does it say it cannot be a non-white posterity?
#3 by Bob on 06/20/2007 - 3:40 pm
All thirteen states had and enforced anti-miscegenation laws.
#4 by Al Parker on 06/20/2007 - 10:36 pm
In that case, let me pose this question. Was it valid to add to “our posterity” Sicilians and Italians who were living below the color line?
#5 by Bob on 06/21/2007 - 5:46 am
Al, why are you mucking abut in this swamo? I already wrote about that.
It is great historical question as to whther Germany includes Alsce. But it is a stupid thing to debate while the fate of the German Nation itself is at risk.