Every country that was and IS still run by Mommy Professor’s Marx began its existence becoming an instant prison.
And Mommy Professor looked about him at his creation and said that it was GOOD.
But Mommy Professor is not the only Professional Thinker who can offer you a deal like this.
If you like Mommy Professor, come to Bob’s Sillishit Store for more great bargains.
Have I got a Philosopher for you!
SUCH a DEAL!
There is also a wholesale deal on Mommy Professors. Each of them is winded up to tell you how stupid the stuff your Mommy and Daddy taught you. Lowah Clahss and Uneducated and how he has a whole array of True Beliefs, straight from Marx and Freud, to replace them.
Forget Mommy! A True Intellectual believes Mommy PROFESSOR!
But here comes the other team. Father Malone has come to demand that you reject Mommy or Daddy and concentrate on avoiding using your balls on females. That’s the FIRST Commandment!
Down in the ring, knocking aside Mommy and Mommy Professor, the Priest knocks Mommy and Mommy Professor aside to announce that sterility is only One of the Foundations of his Act. He also offers PAIN. This is the privilege of being a man with a SOUL.
A mere dog who is in hideous agony with almost no chance of survival — there is no such thing as NO chance in statistics — is given a quick, easy death.
But every year the billionth chance to save a terminal spinal cancer patient increases, and The Father demands more agony and more agony. The agonized patient begs to die.
But it is not the patient’s choice. That belongs to Medical Ethics, which are answerable to the churches, and those medical ethics forbid “doing harm.”
And AGONY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH “DOING HARM!”
In medical ethics, only death is harm.
So Father John and Doctor Brown are arm in arm, demanding agony before any more morphine doses.
And NO HEROIN. It is more effective, but illegal.
Heroin is addictive, you see.
In any sane environment, this would be a joke. Too hideous a joke for a priest or a doctor to actually laugh at, but who else but a sadistic clown could come up with such a scenario?
But the priest has a robe and six thousand years of barbaric custom behind him, and the doctor has the Hippocratic Oath, and that was in GREEK!
Wow! How could anybody weigh plain old agony against a guy with a dress on using Latin and GREEK!
The point is that you might want to call this crap BEFORE you end up in the hospital with the Marvels of Modern Medicine keeping you alive for weeks in terminal agony.
Maybe the time will come for YOU when the humor of worshipping academic and religious robes becomes an OBVIOUS nightmare.
#1 by Jason on 12/28/2013 - 10:17 am
What’s wrong with US that we let these parasitical creeps get so much power us???
#2 by YankeeRebel on 12/28/2013 - 10:38 am
A Living Will is a good idea, but even those get ignored sometimes because of the power granted to doctors and religious leaders. How can it be morally superior to deny a person access to better pain relief when they are dying or to keep a person hooked up to machines that might be prolonging a life of agony?
#3 by shari on 12/28/2013 - 1:47 pm
Worshipping any kind of professional, even doctors, is a bad idea in an anti-white, closed system. Doctors aren’t free to give you their best advise. They don’t either.
Right now it’s very difficult to make informed decisions before a crisis. Especially, if you don’t have gobs of money. Insurance has become an extortion racket imo.
#4 by jo3w on 12/28/2013 - 11:36 pm
In so far as medical ethics are concerned, this article is grossly misleading/misinformed. Modern medical ethics are answerable to the law and the state boards. Religous groups influnce state boards and state/federal legislators, but to imply that the state board answers to the church is antiquated. Freedom to die is controled by state and federal government. It is the threat of loosing your license and freedom which prevents euthanization. The statment, “in medical ethics, only death is harm” is blatently incorrect. I truly hope I’ve missed something here.
#5 by Denounce Genocidists on 12/28/2013 - 11:58 pm
jo3w, that is a very irresponsible attitude, I for one have seen elderly family members who`ve been tortured and butchered by the paychecked adherents of Funded Science and a younger family member who`s suffered an even worse fate, induced into miscegenation to please the priests of the anti-white religion.
Your forelock tugging is out of place here.
#6 by jo3w on 12/29/2013 - 8:13 am
” I for one have seen elderly family members who`ve been tortured and butchered by the paychecked adherents of Funded Science”
Everyone has the right to refuse treatment. If your family members were treated after refusal, that is felony assault. As far as pain management is concerned, Physicians within organizations like Hospice, administer just short of lethal doses of pain drugs. It is routine that family members of the recently deceased will accuse and threaten legal action against Hospice and their Physicians because they believe that their terminally ill family members were overdosed on pain meds. To include all doctors in the “anti-white religion” is irresponsible.
Also, what in the word is forelock tugging?
#7 by jo3w on 12/29/2013 - 8:31 am
Never mind, I googled forelock tugging.
#8 by Denounce Genocidists on 12/29/2013 - 12:16 am
jo3w: ” It is the threat of loosing your license and freedom which prevents euthanization.”
Duh!
#9 by -Dave- on 12/29/2013 - 12:46 am
There is no way the “law” can administer euthanasia. Like so many things in life, it is impossible that the law could ever become competent over such an issue.
Opinions about it and the conceits of ethics are beside the point. That fact is that doctors issue death certificates without a second glance, and coroners pass most bodies through with barely a cursory glance. It is standard operating procedure.
The perpetually upset heart summons dread that ALWAYS has a basis in reality. Conceit? It is the face of dread. And yes Mommy Professor IS silly. Her comfortable life affords her space to be silly.
Professors like Richard Dawkins (The God Delusion) are exemplars of official silliness. There is no need to posit a divine being to explain why holes have nothing in them and roads run two ways. Why Oxford professors can explain that fully, and there is no need to posit the existence of God to explain any of it. And don’t accuse Oxford Professors of the conceit of elevating themselves to the level of God, why didn’t Professor Dawkins tell you that God is a delusion?
We are supposed to buy that silliness and take it seriously in order to prove what rubes we are. Richard Dawkins is a circus performer earning a living. Don’t take the clown on stage seriously and PLEASE don’t give him any money.
And forget ethics. They mean nothing.
#10 by Jason on 12/29/2013 - 2:12 am
Dawkins has become a Leftwing clown. But you can’t really challenge anything said in the God Delusion. There is no such thing as a factual argument for God. Making fun of him doesn’t prove God exists.
Referencing some long dead script written by somebody tripping on mushrooms doesn’t prove God exists. There is no such thing as a factual argument for God.
Well, at least not that I’ve ever heard. And I have listened. So, in reality, I don’t think you offer a serious that challenges anything said in the God Delusion. You can make fun of him and professors, but you can’t refute what he says.
#11 by Denounce Genocidists on 12/29/2013 - 3:08 am
Dawkins and the other costumed charlatans have set themselves up as Gods to create a brown world of infinite suffering, but we can`t refute what they say?
How does that work?
#12 by Jason on 12/29/2013 - 4:08 am
We can’t refute what he says about God. That was my point. When anyone says there is no evidence for God, it’s mighty difficult to argue the point.
Dawkins is anti-White from what I can tell, or at least of the typical liberal/leftist elitist mindset, so pretty much the same thing. He knows humans vary genetically and has said so, so his treason to Whites, if he is anti-White, is far worse.
But as far as what he says about God, on THAT point, you can’t refute what he says or what any of those “new atheist” jerks say.
Saying that someone who denies God is “setting themselves up as God” is just a rhetorical trick to avoid the point. It’s the same thing that Indian Gurus do to cheat their suckers.
#13 by Denounce Genocidists on 12/29/2013 - 4:19 am
No, you`ve missed the point Jason, Dawkins for all of his scientific airs and graces is no improvement on the angels on a pin theologians, and like them lives very well off the fat of the land to give us his pronouncements on The Universal Reality.
#14 by Jason on 12/29/2013 - 4:30 am
Yeah Cambridge, Harvard, etc. are full of parasites. Actually parasites are not the worst they have. They obviously have TRAITORS. Both race traitors and traitors to their own countries (giving support to the USSR).
And they definitely see themselves as a Professor Priesthood. But Dave seemed to imply, if I understand him correctly, that this somehow means God is real, or that denying God is purely an act of arrogance. But I may have misunderstood what he was saying.
#15 by Jason on 12/29/2013 - 4:19 am
But on the anti-White part, for whatever he has done and said, he can certainly be denounced.
#16 by shari on 12/29/2013 - 9:13 am
There are ways and means to assault those refusing treatment. Fourteen years ago I had a mole removed that had turned ugly. The law said it had to be determined if it was malignant. It was and I was told I now needed to proceed with a biopsy to determine if it was just the mole or more. I believed that it was just the mole and decided not to spend a few thousand on proving a negative and have a rather large scar to show for it. The pressure and calls started immediately and of course insurance has to be notified even though they paid for nothing, as we only carried major medical. Another story.
Any doctor, teacher, policeman, baker, candlestick maker who does not subscribe to the anti-white religion has been swimming upstream, trying to keep from drowning. I can see why poor old Semmelweiss died in an insane assylum. He wasn’t insane, he was broken. Bob knows some things about this as well.
#17 by Simmons on 12/29/2013 - 11:22 am
I think religion being mostly human silliness. Women and their minds gifted from god no doubt are about to put Christianity to bed with their selfish notion “God loves me because I’m nice.” And that is it. I stay out of the netherworlds of silly men of atheism and theology, take my advice don’t act like a conservative who feels the need to sound profound.
#18 by Simmons on 12/29/2013 - 11:26 am
What props up the horrors of liberal anti-white ideology but conservatives tailgating their genius upon the subjects.
At Vox Popoli today he leads his fellow smart conservatives on a merry chase of trying to disprove racial equality.
Here it is folks there exists no proof of racial equality, racial equality being another god figment.
Stop propping up the left
#19 by BGLass on 12/30/2013 - 9:06 am
“….There are ways and means to assault those refusing treatment.”
If the (now dying) culture ever produced any “art,” whatsoever, it was in the “ways and means” and coercions that have been its main (and most interesting) magic.
Even if different groups really were “equal,” they should all still be allowed to LIVE. Why would somebody even want to talk about something so dumb?
#20 by BGLass on 12/30/2013 - 9:13 am
A sad thing, though—- calling things doesn’t necessarily protect one from them in such a society, so discernment (just like a lot of other good qualities) can come to feel more like a curse. Most people with a brain fear medicine and its minions with their obamacare degrees (of whatever age) more than death.
the cycle of managing death so some can feed from the others near corpses is so obvious and horrifying.
#21 by BGLass on 12/30/2013 - 9:15 am
Sorry, can’t edit—
meant to say “Baby Boomer” is a code word for whites. The “problems” of “caring” for the DYING “boomers…” etc, etc. Baby Boomer is a code word for generational americans (i.e., whites and usually northwest euros). Just a code word.