Archive for February, 2006
COUNTERATTACK!
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, How Things Work on 2/14/2006
Stormfront is back up!!
But if they come after ME, I doubt I can get the Blog back up.
SF located the computers and somehow muted them.
Incredible work!
Congratulations to Don Black and James Kelso.
Now let’s see if that blue-ribbon group that says it’s for a free internet is going to make the slightest protest when Politicl Inoccrectness is attacked.
And remember, this blog can go out at any time.
FULL SCALE ATTACK!!!
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, How Things Work on 2/14/2006
I just talked to Kelso.
There is a full-scale attack by hundreds of coordinated computers, mostly in Europe, against Stormfront.
In my expert opinion, this is a government-sponsored attack. Stormfront is immobilized.
THIS IS THE FIRST TIME SINCE THE FALL OF THE USSR THAT A FULL-SCALE JAMMING ATTACK HAS BEEN BY GOVERNMENT AGAINST OUTSIDE COMMUNICATIONS!
The USSR usd to do this regularly against Radio Free Europe and other Western broadcasts.
If Whitaker’s Blog goes out, it means this attack has spread out. I will have no means of reaching you.
Mark and More About Age Requirements
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 2/13/2006
Mark says, strating with a quote from me:
“By the way, before I was a professor I worked in a prison and noted how many men were inmates because of statutory rape.
I got into college when I was sixteen, so the students I was teaching were my age or older. So I decided to show my Wisdom by telling them to be careful about the age of the girl they were with.”
Bob, if this were true you would have been under age 14 while working in a prison and I have a hard time believing — even during your prime when you rubbed shoulders with the Pilgrims at Plymouth Rock — they did not allow 14 year olds to stand guard in a prison. I mean, puh-lease!!!
I was explaining why I was older than many of the students.
I began teaching as a grad assistant at age ninteen, and at that time, since Political Science was a sophomore course, the students who began college at eighteen had to be at least my age to take it.
I got my first amateur radio license at age twelve.
I went to Cuba with a friend of the family when I was about that age.
My brother had been a prison doctor for two years back inthe 1950s. He was allowed to do research in prisons, and I worked with him.
I became a regular college professor in my early twenties. The college where I taught STILL had a lot of students older than I was, and by that time I was used to the idea, so when I came to give them advice about real life and they made me look a bit silly doing it, I had enough sense of humor to laugh at myself.
I forget which class it was I told about the number of prisoners in for statutory rape.
So I was not teaching a class when I was sixteen.
BUT what is of interest here is that I have just been writing about age limits.
This fits in beautifully.
When I was in high school — and I went to college at sixteen — went into an operating room with a med student. I was standing there in surgical mask and outift, and the operating sugeon said, “Doctor, would you get me the something or other.”
It scared me half to death, but I was afraid to say anything that would get my buddy into trouble. So I asked where it was and got the container and poured it into the thing he was holding, spilling some.
There is no way on earth that could happen today. With all the malpractice suits, everybody in the operating room knows exactly who everybody else is.
By the time I entered c0llege I had been drinking in bars a lot. I bought huge amounts of liquor in the liquor stores.
Derek brought up the age at which one can buy drinks.
The first and only time anybody every asked me for ID I was buying been in Virginia and I was a college professor and was old enough to buy the stuff.
One more comment about age.
There was a huge movement to raise the driving age in all states from fourteen to sixteen. I was the ONLY witness against it in hearings in South Carolina, while the usual line of backward-collar mainline clergy and the other activists were all for it.
I was the ONLY person in the whole room who knew some statistics:
Drivers between fourtten and sixteen were VERY safe drivers. MOST of the fatal accidents were caused by males between the ages of sixteen and twenty-five. I said MOST. That small percentage of drivers caused more fatal accidents than all of hte other age and sex groups COMBINED.
So the logical thing to do, if we were going to concentrate on age, would have been to allow kids from 14 to 16 to drive and then lifting all to drive and then take away all males’ licenses from 16 to 25. But at that time 21-year-olds VOTED, and NOBOY was about to take away their licenses.
But, as in the case of circumcision, you could always pick on the kids.
So when they had to “do something” the actvists, as always, picked on the convenient target.
They did manage to raise the driving age from 14 to 15. This means that when a young man reaches the dangerous ago of 16 he has one less year of driving experience.
In Europe at that time the age to get a driver’s license was 21 and the test was very, very hard. The fatalities per mile in Europe were consistently THREE TIMES as high as in the United States. America was the safest driving country on earth and I do not believe that any state, even New York, had a minimum driving age above 16.
So the popular solutions, tougher licensing rules and higher driving ages, did not work. But all the activists pushed them.
And let me repeat what I have said before:
Under the rules anywhere but at the University of South Carolina in the 1950s, I would have been a high school dropout. That University now has the same rules.
Whitaker began learning Whitakerism at a VERY early age.
Age, Sex, Kings, and Bob Trying to be Wise
Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 2/11/2006
Theya re still discussing age and sex over in the Pic Thread, so I thrrew in the following comment:
By the way, in the olden days, a child who inherited the throne had a regent until he was fourteen years of age. At fourteen he was considered adult enough to rule.
Pitt the Younger became Prime Minister of Great Britain and Her Empire when he was 24. In the American Constitution you have to be 25 to be a congressman, 30 for the Senate and 35, an age most people did not live to at the time, to be president.
In early America, where land was plentiful and children were an economic asset, marriage at 14 was fairly common. At the same time, in Scandinavia, many men simply did not marry.
I know I’m boring you, but I could give lots of other factual information that would send you to sleep, the way my lectures as a professor of economics did.
Oh. I got my driver’s license at age 14, like almost every other South Carolinian did in the 1950s.
Going to pieces over youth is a waste of time.
For those who believe I am a moral paragon, let me disabuse you.
I don’t go after young women because for me to chase them is exactly like a dog chasing a truck.
A dog loves to show off chasing cars and trucks, but what in the HELL would he do if he CAUGHT one?
By the way, before I was a professor I worked in a prison and noted how many men were inmates because of statutory rape.
I got into college when I was sixteen, so the students I was teaching were my age or older. So I decided to show my Wisdom by telling them to be careful about the age of the girl they were with.
Their reaction was, “What in the hell are we supposed to do, ask for a picture ID in the heat of passion?”
After that I kept my Brilliant Advice to myself.
A Book of Numbers
Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 2/11/2006
The shortest Book in the Bible is the Book of Titus. It is just a little bit longer than you would tolerate for an entry in Bob’s Blog.
It contains the phrase, “If you are a master, be a good master. If you are a slave, be a good slave.”
So this little Book of Numbers will be shorter than Titus.
Numbers are very important to the place of women in our society. As I have said before, poor Good Queen Anne of England had twenty-one children, and not one of them survived. Clearly, this was not because she lacked the resources to feed them or to get good care.
Throughout almost all of history women spent their lives bearing children just to keep the population stable. It was a terrific burden.
Nobody who talks about the place of women today seems to take this into account.
Elizabeth and I had a dialogue about the fact that a woman who carried a noble name was NEVER alone during the years when she could conceive. When a queen bore a child, the room was FULL of witnesses.
It is a bit hard to discuss real history with someone who does empathize with past realities.
Back when Roots first came out as a TV docudrama, Pat Buchanan wrote a piece about it in TV Guide. He said that HIS Irish ancestors would LOVE to have had the little cabins the slaves lived in. They lived in tenements with a single toilet for dozens of families.
John Brown was financed by the Secret Six, “New England industrialists.” So where did John Brown’s money come from?
Those New England industrialists preferred to hire children. Their hands were smaller and they worked for half the price. They worked fourteen hour days.
Every one of the Secret Six regularly had exhausted children fall into the machines and become crippled.
Since the children were free, their disability was THEIR problem.
So the kids begged or starved.
Slaves always were their masters’ problem in the South. So when railroads were built in the malarial marshes, the slaveholders NEVER had their slaves do it.
They hired Pat Buchanan’s ancestors, Irishmen from the North. They were was to hire because even the fourteen hour a day factories in Abolitionist Boston had “Irish Need Not Apply” signs.
This is a matter of simple economics. Why risk a thousand-dollar fieldhand’s life when an Irishman who died didn’t cost you a dime?
Likewise, one of many routine lies the British tell about the South was on the series, “Connections.” The narrator said we “kidnapped Africans as slaves.”
Like using Irishmen for the life-threatening jobs, that just didn’t make simple sense. No white man EVER “kidnapped a black” in Africa. We ALWAYS bought them from other blacks.
But a British lie against Southerners is considered to be pure morality in the British Establishment.
More numbers:
Ninty five percent ofthe slaves imported into America were imported into Latin America or the Carribbean. Kael Marx talks about the incredible death rate of slaves brought into Britain’s Jamaica.
There was only one place where the black slave population showed a natural increase. That was the five percent who were lucky enough to be sold in the American South.
Blacks multiplied in the South. The day they were freed, their death rate doubled for decades afterward.
Numbers tell a story.
Paid historians tell an entirely different one.
And if you think Yankees lie, you really should listen to Canadians and Europeans.
Sex and Guilt
Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 2/11/2006
On the Pic Thread on Stormfront one guy was very upset about how he had thought a fifteen year old girl was older. She was dressed as an adult and looked twenty, but he decided to feel guilty about his reaction.
This is what I replied to him:
“nor wolf, take it from an old man: Life will kick you plenty without your kicking yourself.”
“We men have developed our taste for nubile young women over a period of a million years or so. Most of those societies did not have photo IDs.”
“I don’t feel guilty if a young girl looks years older than I think she is. Every bartender runs into serious trouble with that mistake. He is not a pedophile, he simply misjudged her age.”
“Besides, legally a pedophile preys on children. This young lady is definitely not a child.”
“Your obligation is the same as the bartender’s: if she is below a certain age you don’t serve her alcohol and you don’t make sexual advances. The fact that you have a normal male reaction to a girl who looks older than she is is not only not a crime, it should bother you if you DIDN’T make such mistakes IN YOUR MIND.”
“Don’t start believing in Thought Crime. In the fifties one line of a hit song was, “You can’t arrest a guy for what he’s thinking.”
“You didn’t choose your instincts. You are responsible for what you do about them.”
“I repeat, get off the guilt trip. Life will kick you plenty without you doing it to yourself.”
“Let’s keep that old-fashioned attitude, you can’t arrest, or even blame, a guy for what he’s thinking.”
To get into our blog language, an Aryan who is nto a psychopath leads a rough life. We are SO hard on ourselves!
One German put it beautifully:
“If you were as unforgiving to others people as you are of yourself, you would be a sadist.”
Nobody ever mistook me for Jesus, but even HE only said a man shouldn’t commit ADULTERY in his heart. A married man should think of his wife. Jesus never said a man should have no sexual thoughts whatever, though the unooficial doctrine of every faith is that Jesus never thought about any woman as a woman except his mother.
I think this is VERY bad, because it makes Christianity look like a return to the womb.
Jesus sat and ate and gossiped with the tax gatherers and the other just plain sinners. And I have seen nothing in Gospel like,
“And he wath always a wet blanketeth in those discourses.”
The self righteous Holy Priest went to Hell, the tax gatherer in the dark behind him was saved. Jesus does NOT say he stopped being a tax gatherer. The priest continued to obey the Commandments and was in fact a VERY righteous man.
But the tax gatherer asked God for forgiveness. The High Priest told God what a Righteous Man he was.
Jesus did not have a high opinion of human beings who judged others.
“Let those who are without sin cast the first stone.”
And in every church, the air is full of stones.
I am told I am not righteous enough or SOUR enough to be a Good Christian.
As John Wesley said, “A sour face is the Devil’s religion.”
If Jesus is the sour-faced Puritan every church says he is, I don’t stand a chance anyway.
Thanks, Mark and Especially Peter
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 2/10/2006
Peter, bless him, actually REPEATED Bob’s Mantra.
It doesn’t do any good to talk AROUND it. It doesn’t do any good if you say, “Well, that was included in my message.”
A weapon is useful if you aim THAT WEAPON and you aim it AT the enemy.
When the English found that the long bow worked, they didn’t say, “Well, we have some stuff on the same principle.” They just kept using the long bow. They kept shooting the clothyard arrows AT the enemy.
Many a time the enemy wished they could just say, “You are really getting unspophistcated. You’re getting repetitious.” If the English had been respectable conservative or the average Stormfronter, tehy would have been ashamed of themselves and started trying other weapons.
But the bow and arrow worked, so they just kept on using it.
When you have good weapon and your race is on the line, it is VERY frustrating when people refuse to USE it.
Here is what Mark and Peter had to say:
Bob don’t give up on them. I was a liberal when I was a teenager — until President Reagan made his appearance and started me thinking. As the old blow-hard Limbaugh liikes to say, “The definition of a conservative is a liberal who got mugged.” These Stormfronters just aint been mugged yet. The way immigration is going and the way blacks are “empowering” themselves at our expense, I don’t think it’s gonna be awful long until all of us white folks get mugged and in a big way — which will make our jobs much easier here.
Comment by Mark — 2/9/2006 @ 11:03 pm | Edit This
Mark’s right. By the way, your drumbeat is getting clearer, if that is possible. The ninnies are improving your game.
” Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries.”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I want the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I say that, I’m a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
Comment by Peter
The President’s Token Child
The two Democratic presidents elected since 1964 share the Confederate Rule.
They share something else: the Token Child.
Carter and Clinton each had one daughter.
This was critical. Hillary wrote “It Takes a Village” and she has been a professionaql advisor on motherhood and children’s right from the word go.
I have forgotten everybody’s first names, but the Carters wanted to be a plain couple from Plains, Georgia, and the image would have been hard to maintain if they hadn’t had their one girl.
Carter made it clear that HIS daughter was going to go the Washington, DC public schools.
I remember driving by a public school in DC where a single little blond girl was standing there at recess between two men standing beside her in coats and ties. I do not know whether that was Amy (?) Carter, the Carters’ token daughter, but I can’t imagine who else it could have been.
She didn’t look like she was having much fun.
The Carter’s token daughter ended up being a nutcase (takes one to know one, you know). She became one of the maybe two girls in America who for years dyed her blond hair black and I haven’t heard of her since.
But she served her purpose.
The Clinton’s token child seems to have come out all right, though I have no special info on her. Last I heard she was living the high life that her father’s friends bring but, praise the girl, she hasn’t slid into drugs or anything.
I believe she’s blond, too, b ut she hasn’t dyed her hair.
So if the Democrats are looking for a winner next time, they need a candidate from the Old Confederacy who has the required one child.
Hillary is a senator from New York.
Headline Clones
As I explained below, the only Democrats who actually WON an election since 1944 were from the Old Confederacy.
But the last two were so much alike that I STILL say “Carter” when I mean Clinton and vice-versa.
I think in electoral terms. To those who live by the daily headlines Clinton and Carter are very different. To someone who lives in historical tersm, as I do, they are the same phenomenon.
To a person who kept up with the news from 1877 to 1901, Presidents Hayes, Garflied, Athur, Harrison and McKinley were entirely different people. To me they were all standard Republican hacks from the Midwest.
History seems to confirm my judgement.
If you live in a world of frantic e-mails you totally overlook the sober realities.
The Other Stupid Party
The Democrats have only elected three presidents since 1960, and very few people disagree that, even with the help of Lyndon Johnson getting Southern votes, Mayor Daily had to steal the 1960 election for Kennedy.
Harry Truman had Confederate ancestors and his running mate was from Kentucky.
So no Northern president has gotten elected president on the Democratic ticket since 1944!
Over sixty years!
Since Johnson’s election in 1964, a mere forty years or so, two Democrats have been elected president.
Both were from the Old Confederacy.
So the Democrats keep nominating presidential candidates from Massachusetts and the Canadian border.
The only two Democratic presidents elected since 1964 were from the Old Confederacy. Everybody thought Clinton was being absurd when he shose a running mate from another Old Confederate state.
When it comes to politics, Clinton is anything but absurd. In 1992 he saw the Old Confederacy Rule and went for it big time.
None of the professional commentators had even noticed it.
They still haven’t.
If Bush, Junior had not had a Texas accent, Gore would have been elected in 2000.
Where else are you going to read that but Bob’s Blog?
You Get TIRED!
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 2/9/2006
There is an Opposition Thread in Stormfront.
I often get in and argue with the anti-whites , but I am about out of patience with my “comrades.” I just put this in there:
——————————————————————————–
These antis may be good solid citizens to the rest of you. But I always keep in mind that their goal is to destroy my race.
Do they MEAN to? I don’t CARE. I am not here to save their souls or judge their guilt.
So I tell them, over and over, Bob’s Mantra:
” Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries.”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I want the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I say that, I’m a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
They can’t deal with that.
So you give them an out. You go back and recite, just as they say you do, the same old lines.
Why should they deal with the hard question when you provide them with softballs to tap back?
I spent many weary years doing this in politics, but at least I got paid for it and it beat the hell out of working for living.
I would confront liberals with how their last five recommendations had been disasters, that thye had to be forced to admit they had even SAID such things.
Then a respectable conservative would come to their rescue. He would make a nice, standrad criticism and assure them of his deepest respect, and the discussion would go past mean old John Ashbrook and Bob Whitaker and go bakc to the rut and get out of the ditch I had put in front of them and they couldn’t deal with.
But, as I say, I got paid good money for that, and I am comfortably on the proceeds.
Not one single one of my “comrades” has demanded an answer to my repeated question. They keep going back into the groove.
I’ll be damned if I am going to play this game any more.
Forgive a tired old man. If you can’t back me up, I’ll leave you to your softball game.
Correta and Hillary
Until Saint Martin the King was shot, the word “asassination” had only one meaning in America: the president, and only the president, was assassinated.
Other people were shot. Other people were murdered. But only one person was assassinated, and that was the American Head of State.
Then Saint Martin Luther the King was “assassinated.”
Like Saint John the Kennedy and future Saint Bill Clinton, Saint Martin Luther the King had a serious woman problem.
In the spirit of the later O.J. Simpson, Saint Martin Luther the King DESPISED black women. He wanted females, to be, as the signs said, “White Only.”
So when Saint Martin the Luther was martyred or assassinated, the FBI files on him were locked up for fifty years. That would be 2018 AD, but I think the period has been extended.
I just wrote a piece on Hillary. Now MLK’s professionally grieving widow has died.
The two women share a legacy:
Their husbands were, to put it mildly, unfaithful.
Both women share another trait: given the choice between protesting adultery and being Mrs. King and Mrs. Clinton, neither took a nanosecond to decide which was better.
Churchill’s Bargain
In the end Winston Churchill was one of the worst enemies the white race and the British Empire ever had. To his death he kept saying that the British Empire was good and his whole life had been devoted to it.
He never forgave those like Lord Mountbatten who gave India away by 1948, three years after his V for Victory war against Germany had been won.
Joe Sobran keeps pointing out, with a courage I find hard to believe, World War II was fought entirely for the benefit of Joseph Stalin and, in the end, for Mao Tse-Tung.
Nobody else won anything.
Britain lost everything.
As Sobran says, Churchill was criticized for throwing himself completely behind the USSR when Germany invaded them in 1941 and Churchill replied, “I would ally with Satan Himself if he were opposed to Adolf Hitler.”
So that is exactly what he did.
His policy was that he would be willing to destroy Britain if he could destroy Germany doing it.
He succeeded.
In fact, I remember that in the 1970s British workers were pouring into Germany — the country Churchill had destroyed — to work for double the wages they could get back in Britain.
By the 1970s Britain had lost her empire, she had lost her standard of living, and she had just begun to lose the British Islands themselves to a flood of third world immigration.
In 1948 Winnie could not understand what happened to his precious British Empire after his Great Victory.
And the real collapse had not even started yet.
Roger Moore, the actor, is an upper-class Englishman and an intimate of royalty there. He said, “We Britons love to talk about World War II. It’s the last time we WERE anybody.”
World War II is the REASON that is the last time they WERE anybody. I have a sneaking suspicion that Roger Moore, whose good looks hid a first-rate mind, KNOWS that.
FLASH BACK TO THE USA:
I hear people say, “I was FOR civil rights at first. Then it got out of hand.”
No joke?
They were FOR “civil rights” when I was desperately telling people that civil rights would lead to exactly what it has led to.
I didn’t like them then. I don’t like them now.
To say the least.
I don’t like Churchill.
To say the least.
When yet another white worker tells me he didn’t get upset about genocide against the white race until he suddenly found himself a second-class citizen in the job market, I tut-tut diplomatically. I pretend sympathy.
But I know he got EXACTLY what he ASKED for. I know he was perfectly willing to sell his race out, but then it hit HIM.
Poor baby!
And the pitiful little Brit who “did his part” in World War II gets exactly the same kind of sympathy from me.
Like Winston Churchill, they all bargained with Satan.
It may be my Bible Belt background, but it never occurred to me that anybody could make a deal with Satan and come out ahead.
An Irrelevant Comment on Zoning
I am lazy as hell.
But in this case I prefer a Politically Correct way of putting this.
Let’s call me ” a convenience-minded individual.”
But the fact is that I get no fun at all out of shopping for a car. My dream car was the old Volkswagen I owned in the 1960s. You put in gas and took it in for maintenance every 3,000 miles. When it snowed and everybody else was putting on chains, it just drove right over the snow and ice.
I now live in a condo and it saves me a mint. But I loved to come back to the USA and stay in an apartment, where you just called the office if anything broke.
One scientist spoke for me perfectly:
My body is just something to carry my mind around in.”
When I returned to Washington, DC I would live in a high-rise apartment with a convenience store less than a block away. All of them were run by Koreans and stayed open almost every hour of every day
The last high-rise I lived in had the convenience store inside the building, just an elevator ride away.
Then Nirvana came close. Right beside the six twenty-six-story high rises, one of which I lived in, was a complete shopping center. There was work underway to set up a DIRECT connection between the shopping center and the high rises.
The shopping center was at the bottom of a hill on which the highrises sat. You couldn’t hear a sound from it.
When I left the USA again, I confidently expeted to come back to a country where you could take your shopping cart and walk to the shopping center with it.
By the time I got back, the whole thing had changed. That trend ended abruptly. Zoning came in hard and fast.
A woman in a luxury highrise doesn’t want to go out in her curlers. So she has to dress decently to drive to get that coffee creamer. But the very idea of a direct connection between a shopping mall and a highrise is considered the height of vulgarity now.
In the highrise condos where I live now, there used to be a carry-out restaurant on the first floor. Now there is a consulting firm.
Ther is also a job counseling service and a voter education office, and similar things.
It is zoned against convenience shops or anything else that might be useful to a resident of these condos.
When I ride through the expensive suburbs, I see that the more expensive they are, the farther it is to absolutely anything a resident might need.
I don’t understand this. Maybe that’s because I just ain’t got class.
Today, the ideal is that if you have no cream for your coffee, you have to dress for the weather, go out and get your car and drive several miles to a shopping center to get anything.
I Am Getting AWFULLY Tired of Being the ONLY One Who Repeats Bob’s Mantra
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 2/9/2006
I put t his on Stormfront:
——————————————————————————–
I said this to one of those integrationists who claims to be a True American:
We cannot have an honest dialogue until our REAL point of view, the point of those of us, who unlike you, have a feeling for their own race, is talked about.
Some time ago, the KGB files were opened. One liberal writer was enraged that all the people liberals have assured him were not Communist spies were, in fact, just that.
He wrote a book about his betrayal. A last-ditch writer answered him by saying that, yes those leftists were spies for Stalin, but they weren’t TRAITORS. He said “They were just practicing another form of patriotism.”
So to you giving up your race is, if anything, a noble sacrifice, “antoher form of humanitarianism.”
To us, it is what it is, treason.
But I seem to the only personon Stormfront who can state this point and stick with it.
When you say in another post that “integration isthe solution,” you are certainly right. It is the final solution to the “race” problem, which is the code word for the WHITE problem.
ONLY white countries and ALL white countries are pressured to solve this “race” problem by third world immigration and integratin. No Asian or African country is pressued to solve this “race” problem.
I can’t get anybody else on Stormfront to concentrate on this bottom line.
My problem is your underlying theme of genocide. You consider it coincidental.
That is our fundamental, unbridgeable difference. You are saying you are practicing your own form of patriotism by being a good American. I am sure you believe it. I am sure the Stalinist-Americans believed it.
Suddenly when I bring this up, you become a patriotic America Firster, saying you are only talking about America. And your compatriots in Austria say they are only talking about Austria.
The net result is genocide.
Granted you don’t think about this sort of thing since you have no feeling for your own race, but loyal white people do.
Come up with something that doesn’t amount to genocide, and we can talk. Our race is not for sale.
To me you are just one more agent of genocide fighting on his own front.
If ONLY black countries and ALL black countries were singled out this way, I am sure those who influence you would get you to protesting it.
That is the way we look at you. Nobody but me seems to be able to say it.
Welcome Back, Richard!
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 2/9/2006
Richard says:
“I was under the impression that Hillary’s sympathy for the Palestinians (since recanted, of course) ruled her out? You can’t be president if the you-know-whos don’t let you.”
“BTW, I never knew Teddy Kennedy was elected president! ”
Welcome back, Richard! It seems like a long time since I had a comment from you! I mentioned you as one of the few people here I know personally, and I thought meeting me may be the reason you dropped out.
According to all the media and expert predictions, Nelson Rockefeller and Teddy Kennedy are two former presidents. For the three years before each election they were described as leading the list of presidential contenders.
I saw a great cartoon on Sotmfront that had a black picture and a caption:
“This picture is final, absolute truth that the Holocaust occurred. If you don’t see it, you’re anti-Semitic.”
The same thing is true of the presidencies of Nelson Rockefeller and Teddy Kennedy. Decade after decade, all the best-paid experts told you they were going to be president next time.
If you don’t see them in the historical records, it is because you are blinded by provincialism and bigotry.
No, Sheri, This Site is not Abandoned!
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses, General on 2/9/2006
Shari asked, “Is this site abandoned?”
That made me feel good.
Joe says I’m the head honcho here, which has to be true — you need somebody presiding, but what keeps me going is YOU. I just had to approve two legitimate comments and thirty-two pieces of spam.
In a sense, this is your blog, too. A major part of what I put here is your comments, and most of the rest is my responses to them. Those comments appear twice, once in comments and once here in the main body so I can answer them.
I’ll get back to work as soon as I’ve welcomed Richard back.
Stop X
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 2/5/2006
My last post on Hillary reminded me of another rule I have observed in presidential elections.
During every presidential election campaign all the paid commentators forget what really happened in the ones before it. The nomination of a liberal Democrat from Massachusetts by the Democrats last time is just one more in this weary line of repeat mistakes.
Despite all the scandals and “Clinton weariness” the Democrats almost won in 2000 because they nominated a Southerner. The last Northerner the Democrats elected tothe presidency was Teddy Kennedy, and they had to steal that one and have Lyndon Johnson on the ticket specifically to the South.
Clinton is a political genius. He defied ALL the rules by picking Al Gore as his running mate in 1992. Rule 1 is that you need goegraphical balance. A Southerner was especially supposed to need somebody VERY un-Southern to balane him off.
Clinton made it very, very clear that his was a SOUTHERN ticket, because, unlike everybody else, he was aware of the presidential history of his entire lifetime. Even Harry Truman had Confederate ancestors.
Antoehr rule that will save you listening to lot of Learned Commentaries is the discussionof a Stop Nixon or a Stop Goldwater or a Stop Bush or a Stop Clinton movement that comes up a couple of months before the convention.
When a Stop X Movement gets under way, it means X has the nomination sewed up.
Hillary
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, General on 2/5/2006
My political opinion is that Mrs. Clinton is like Teddy Kennedy and Nelson Rockefeller.
Over and over, in the three years between presidential elections I would watch the press say that Rockefeller had the Republican nomination sewed up. He never came close.
I kept pointing that out and everybody kept telling me I just didn’t understand.
The media and about everybody else worried about a Ted Kennedy presidency. They said that a KENNEDY would take the nation by storm. Now we can all see that if he had run, he would been beaten worse than McGovern was.
Now everybody is waiting for Hillary to step up and hit the ball out of the park.
Since I got paid for it, I had to be mostly right, so I would think in ways people are not allowed to think. For example, when Steve Forbes was running for nomination, I dismissed him by sayig that he was just too UGLY to be elected.
It wasn’t fair. It wasn’t right to reject a man just because of his looks. But I got paid for political reality.
Hillary has all the personal charm of a snake in a bad mood. That is what people will feel about her.
The time is about here for another Ross Perot, a sane one. If the Republicans nominate anyone who, when push comes to shove, Hillary can actually beat, I think the president will be a protest candidate.
It’s not Objective to Me!
Mark quotes me and says,
“Churchill promised two million Soviets who fought against Stalin that if they surrendered to the Allies,t ehy woud be protected. As soon as they did so, he turned them over to Stalin…”
Don’t forget Saint John Kennedy who did something similar in Cuba. And I would imagine his tosspot brother, Edward, uttered similar words of promise to his nubile ally Mary Jo Kopechne just before he swam to shore and left her to the mercy of the gods. Well maybe that last comparison was a stretch but you get the point…
Comment by Mark
MY REPLY:
I have unending psychological scars from what Saint John the Kennedy did in Cuba. I KNEW the people he betrayed, I KNEW the man who signalled back, when air cover was withdrawn, “You have betrayed us.”
I can FEEL Mary Jo Kopechne being left to die in that suffocation.
But I also know that she worked with Kennedy to destroy us. I do not pity her becauswe she did not pity us.
Ruthless, right?
How can I explain that none of this is theoretical to Ole Bob?
When a Kennedy staffer, the day after Chappaquiddick, was flown over the site, before the press knew about it, he said, “This is the end of the Kennedy presidency.”
That was reported by the press later.
Not, “I can feel how horrible it was to be suffocating in a car under the water, moving to where the air was, and knowing you were going to die.”
The end of the Kennedy presidency was the only point mentioned.
I am a ruthless old bastard.
But how can I tell anybody that that is coldness beyond even my ken?
Simmons Hits the Target Again!
I put this in Stormfront with the comment,
“Despite my natural modesty I am willing to admit that Bob is a genius.”
“But in Bob’s Blog, there is nothing that demonatrates genius more than my interaction with commenters.”
“I talk a lot here. Simmons says very little.”
“You may forget that Ole Bob is the Genius here:”
In reply to my criticism of The Omega Man, Simmons says,
“Give Heston a break, he appeared in the first two “Planet of the Apes”
movies, and they were replete with “Whitakerisms.” The ending of the
second movie could have been scripted here on Whitaker Online.
It is where the apes get past the defenses of the weakling white
“Wordists” of their era, kill the beautiful white woman that was with
the two leading white men (one which is Heston who showed up at the end)
and in the end the two white men knowing that all was lost ended it all. ”
MY REPLY:
So much truth in so few lines!
Their world was lost when the only REAL woman was dead! I had forgotten that!
And the apes were the perfect picture of the anti-racists’ idea of the world. Like Chinese, the apes were able to reach more or less the level that humans had reached and taught them.
But in a million years, the apes would never advance beyond what the humans left them.
It reminds me of the original “Star Wars.” There was not a single non-white in it.
What was interesting was that the criticism most cited about the all-white nature of the first “Star Wars” was the words of a black actor who had last appeared in the black film, “Cotton Comes to Harlem.”
One of his lines in that movie was, “If you do someting to white people, that’s THEIR business. If you do something to black people, that’s MY business.”
Check it out. I don’t remember his name, but both movies are fun.
Naturally Steven Spielberg had a black hero in the next Star Wars film. And Steven Spielberg is a left-wing Jew.
Charleton Heston is not only a gentile, he is a BLOND gentile. So when he made The Omega Man, he apologized big time by having a black girlfriend.
And now Harry Potter’s witch school has a racially balanced student body. Originally they had a token black or two. In other words, the original successes were white.
Heston let it all hang out in the Omega Man.
And it got cut off.
RACISM!
Or reality.
Take your choice.
Derek, Cut the Crap!
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 2/2/2006
In repsonse to “My Name is Bob Whitaker,” Derek says,
“Yes indeed…I don’t know Bob. I just know his ideas and thoughts. I guess that is enough really. ”
“I have been writing in short, declaritive sentences since I first read Hemingway. It is easier to communicate with others when you are direct.”
“Maybe that is why I feel like I fit in even though I don’t know squat in comparison with some of the elder, more learned commenters. ”
Comment by Derek
MY REPLY:
The last sentence pissed me off royally.
Everybody here, even including Joe, whose respect is not easy to come by and who is an old bastard like me, has made it clear that they respect you.
Dammit, and I think I speak for the rest of us older folks, you should APPRECIATE that!
All that apology doesn’t do a damned thing for me. What would compliment me would be if you were cocky about it, if you said, “Here I am in Bob’s Blog, where nobody gets a break. Bob and Joe and Peter and Mark and Shari and Anonymous and all the rest have no mercy. If they think I’m being dumb, they will say so.”
“I am running with the fastest crowd there is, and I am holding my own.”
Now THAT, for you and Shari and anybody else who uses apologies, would be a COMPLIMENT.
Because it is TRUE, which is the one thing we stick to here.
You can apologize yourself to death, but nobody here is going to give you a break.
So what’s the point of all the apology crap?
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize that a young man has not been around as long as Joe and I have.
We also know you are not purple.
Now that I’ve gotten to what is NOT rocket science, let me make a further observation.
Human beings regularly choke to death. That’s why we have the Heimlich Maneuver. Other animals don’t need it because they are not handicapped by the low-lying vocal chords we have. We DIE so we can TALK.
Evolution or Creation, there is a REASON we die so we can TALK.
Talk is critical to us.
You know me because you know what I SAY, not because I smell like a member of the pack. Dogs hardly notice TV because they can’t SMELL it.
We are an eye-oriented animal. We are an IDEA oriented animal. There is a REASON for this.
I am a white man. I LOOK like you. You know my ideas from what I SAY.
The OBJECT: to save people who LOOK like us. The MEANS: Ideas.
You KNOW me.
Peter
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 2/2/2006
Peter asks:
Do you have some pointers to spot a sociopath? Are there any?
So far, all I can tell when talking to people who act a good part, is that some seem to have empty vibes like comatose patients. I think of them to myself as “flat-liners; it’s almost like there is no one there. I can miss this if the person’s act is really good or if there is a lot of emotion in the room. I met Clinton once and shook his hand a couple of times just to see what I felt. Although it was neat to speak with an ex-president, and there was a lot of enthusiasm abounding, I can’t say that I felt anything around and from him. If this was not because he was tired, maybe I found what a high-performing psychopath feels like.
I used to think that a bureaucrat who is utterly cold and lifeless was that way because he was socially stunted and a nerd stuck in an office (so many administrators are short, fat, bald and ugly). I have since learned that there ought to be some sort of emotional vibe emanating from someone or I should get the heck away from him. This kind of person has no restraint on their behavior and they will cause as much harm as they can — at random. Although the emotion is totally flat, there is still a strand of undirected malice leaking from them (and they often don’t give very good eye-contact either). Clinton, however, was just blank and acted the way one would expect him to in public, smiles and all. (However, I did think his handshake was fishlike and that he couldn’t look me directly in the eye for more than millisecond.)
Sorry Bob, this was an intuitive response. I am looking to you for any consistent patterns to remember for spotting a psychopath. I think this would help all of us, if you can enunciate them.
Comment by Peter
MY REPLY:
The point of comments for me is that they make ME think. So my answer is useless to you but your comment is valuable to me.
Straight question from Peter:
“Do you have some pointers to spot a sociopath? Are there any?”
Straight answer from Bob, after some thought:
I don’t know.
I can TELL someone is a psychopath, but it is practical experience because I HAD to learn to tell.
Your description of a definite psychopath, Bill Clinton is instructive. A true psychopath can look you in the eye.
But Clinton was tired and you weren’t worth the trouble to him.
All the commentators, including the conservative, talk about how CHARMING Clinton is. They can’t HELP liking him. He makes them think they are the only person in the world to them.
And he looks them straight in the eye. That is supposed to tell a Practical Man that someone is trustworthy.
Which is yet another reason why the person who thinks he is a Practical Man is the world’s stooge.
A person who cannot look you in the eye becasue he doesn’t believe what is saying is not a psychopath. He cannot look you inthe eye because he is not confident of what he is saying. But a true psychopath couldn’t care less.
George Bush, Senior told the Shiites to rise against Saddam. He said he would back them if htey did. Then they rose and he did nothing.
Stalin did exactly the same thing to the Jews who rose against the Nazis in the Warsaw Ghetto. Russian tanks sat there and watched while the Jews killed Germans and waited for the Communists, their allies against the hated Nordic gentiles, to come to their support.
Stalin was a definite psychopath. Bush may or not have been an actual psychopath.
From the point of view of the Warsaw Ghetto or the Shiites, it made no difference. To me, George Bush, Senior is hte prime example ofhte group that calls itself The Greatest Generation. Psychopaths have no conscience, the Greatest Generation was so morally weak that they NEVER showed the slightest sign of moral courage. They didn’t sell anybody out, they GAVE everything away.
In the first volume of Gulag Archipelago, Solzhenitsyn talks about Winston Churchill, the hero of The Greatest Generation. He HATES the man.
Churchill promised two million Soviets who fought against Stalin that if they surrendered to the Allies,t ehy woud be protected. As soon as they did so, he turned them over to Stalin, which was considerably worse than killing them on the spot. In fact, when they finally realize what was happening, most of them TRIED to commit suicide, but Stalin wanted them alive, so Churchill made sure they had no means to do it.
I have SEEN what Communists do to people they hate and who fall into their hands. If you fight them you carry a grenade, and it is not to be thrown at them.
I can’t make you understand what a horrible man Churchill was.
But was he a psychopath? Are those who worship him psychopaths? Is George Bush, Senior a psychopath or just a member of the The Greatest Generation?
My doctor brother can give you an informed opinion. Mine is entirely practical.
I can tell the difference between extreme moral weakness and INBORN psychopathy. That’s just experience.
In some way, it is easier to deal with a psychopath than with a person who has not the slightest hint of moral courage. Neither reacts to shame, but they both react to fear.
Let me think about this a bit and see if I can explain it further.
New Radio Programs
I have done six more programs that are now in the Audio Archives:
http://www.whitakeronline.org/townhall.htm
Feb. 2, 2006 – Alliance
Feb. 1, 2006 – Guerilla War
Jan. 29, 2006 – The Opinion Industry
Jan. 28, 2006 – Surrounded by Heroes
Jan. 26, 2006 – Innocence
Jan. 19, 2006 – Psychopaths
The easiest way to remember this is to go to whitakeronline.org and look to the right and hit Audio Archives.
-
You are currently browsing the archives for February, 2006
Bob’s Books
Bob's first book - 1976 
A PLAGUE ON BOTH YOUR HOUSES
Bob's second book - 1982 
THE NEW RIGHT PAPERS
Bob's deadliest book - 2004 
Why Johnny Can't Think
America's
Professor-Priesthood
Derek
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 2/14/2006
Derek says,
“My parents wanted me to drop out of high school at 16 and go to college. I didn’t want to, because frankly, that was where I thought all the drugs and girls were. Little did I really know that there was an abundance more of both in college.
I had two friends drop out of high school and go to college with just a GED. Both make ten times what I do now. What does that say about public school?
The main argument that my roomates and I have is about public education. They support it and I don’t. I tell them I would support it if the public at large were comprised of different people. Again that makes me a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews or a racist.
I usually just laugh anymore.
They can back up their arguments with ‘feelings’ and what they consider right. I tend to back mine up with stats.
I didn’t learn that in college. I learned it in life.
Comment by Derek ”
You see how much I learn here?
When I was sixteen, I didn’t even KNOW about the GED and I found out later, about 1960, that you had to be 19 to take the thing.
From what you say the age requirement has been removed. That amazes me because the education establishment would have fought it every inch of the way.
2 Comments