I enjoy the irony of reducing a reality to simple terms. For example, a trend lately has been referring to a study, real or imagined, that shows that superrich and super powerful people are inconsiderate of to the people’s feelings, rude, or, as the old saying goes, “He’s ugly, he can’t sing and he don’t love Jesus.”
First of all, after hearing the profile of the rich a famous a number of times, all it says is that the rich and powerful are like spoiled children.
The lesson I am given from this is that this is how people act who are successful. It may be how people act BECAUSE they are successful.
A person with any experience in the world assumes that this is another one of those things one always hears at a party, expressing a trendy opinion and beginning with “They found out that…”
It still seems to work, but one who has been around a while has to be pretty stupid not to note that every time “They found out that…” is an example to reinforce the latest trendy opinion of the party set and that last time “They found out …” something entirely different.
Anyone who has actually been engaged in population-related studies knows how hard it is to get a consistent sample of anything. But “They found out…” about superrich people by presumably getting a statistically significant number of them together, say two or three thousand, and that the sample is not skewed, so they were able to make their selection from say a hundred thousand volunteers.
How do you assemble several thousand multimillionaires? Anybody who can do THAT isn’t doing academic studies at a professor‘s pay grade..
In other words when you THINK about it the whole thing is absurd.
It is useful to make an impression at the kind of parties I went to, that is one reason they are held. So when someone says “They found out that …” I am the only one who asks, “Who are THEY?”
People no more expect that than they expect a conservative accused of racism to ask, “What is racism?”
But I use the question to go ahead and make the points I made above.
Does this fake “study,” whatever its real source, prove what the trendy thing is, that one BECOMES rich and powerful by acting like a spoiled Jewish kid who was raised by a Jewish Mother, or does it simply show that the rich are spoiled?
Does it exist?
Actually, I would be surprised if, in a society which is based on disloyalty, those who made it up the carious ladders today were not largely scum.
If that is true, it might be a good idea to think about how long those ladders are going to hold up.
#1 by Dave on 10/24/2010 - 12:23 pm
In a real society, there are not going to be any careers.
The word “career” is a polite term for the word “racket”.
That is why you can’t be too hard on Mommy Professor.
Little junior, who bought her con, and who is now $100,000 in debt with no job prospects because of Mommy Professor’s promise of a “career” got exactly what he deserved.
#2 by shari on 10/24/2010 - 12:44 pm
I’m reminded of a wise crack my husband made this morning. He was called from the university this week. Some one said that his “collegue” was looking for somebody to make a part from some kind of plastic. My husband said he was going to start calling his plummer FRIEND, his “collegue.”
#3 by Simmons on 10/24/2010 - 4:31 pm
When you interupt the lib with such a question you will notice nearly every time a physical reaction. So trained are they and so riven with fear and paranoia from their cult training they will flinch.
Cody interupted a Professor’s cult at that hate site little green footballs, and the flinch was so bad you could sense it thru the web.
The only thing when a liberal responds with the “whine” response is how can we extend their pain before they boot us out. Cody did well with calling them “anti-white”, but maybe there is something we can say to totally destroy them mentally/emotionally.
#4 by Dick_Whitman on 10/24/2010 - 8:20 pm
Simmons,
to the whine response:
If warning Whites about the program of genocide being perpetrated against us is “whining,” then I’m guilty as charged. The very fact that you would label this “whining” just reinforces the obvious fact that you are indeed anti-White. You claim you are “anti-racist,” but what you are is anti-White. Anti-racism is code word for anti-White.
#5 by OldBlighty on 10/24/2010 - 9:04 pm
If they call you a whiner, force them to define whining:
How do you define whining? Is any White man who is worried about the disappearance of his race, a whiner? Tell us what we are allowed to say.
Also:
A Black man if insulted would not ask, Why are you insulting the Black race? He would say, Why are you insulting my race? Always make it personal.
Why are you insulting my race? Are you anti-White?
#6 by OldBlighty on 10/24/2010 - 9:21 pm
On fake studies:
One thing I have begun to notice since reading Bob’s blog and listening to the White Rabbit, is how much work our enemies are doing outside of traditional politics.
Now I notice them everywhere, discretely injecting their mantras and fake studies into the public consciousness.
Whats good about this new awareness, is I can zero in on them immediately and point out the inconsistencies in their cut and paste arguments.