@JP Yes, it would still be White Genocide because by definition it’s the deliberate elimination of a distinct human group in whole or in part.

If that “limited” raceblending you mentioned is deliberate and forced, it is indeed Genocide anyway.

I’ve done some thinking about this.

First off, when I said that shaved heads and swastikas are counterproductive, I wasn’t criticizing Jimmy Marr—I was criticizing the NSM’s approach.

One of the many things I love about BUGS is that we seemed to have destroyed the old debate on e-activism vs “real world” activism. In my opinion, we should keep it that way.

Yes, Cobb and his crew have “balls.” But BUGS is NOT about having balls. It’s about spreading our message in every way possible.

This was a success for Jimmy and our team, DESPITE the NSM stubbornly insisting on portraying themselves exactly like the anti-whites WANT us all to be: “Naziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews.”

I got this one very recently:

“And that proves that “anti-racist” is just a code word for anti-white.”
It seems every closet white supremacist dimwit is using this line on the internet at the moment.
Considering how pro-whites exterminated millions of people across Europe 70 years ago, hearing pigs like you talk about “genocide” is hypocritical bullshit. Whining racists. No country is home to any race, the world has moved on from that garbage.

“how is promoting racial segregation NOT racist?”

First of all, the anti-Whies always lie. They are not against racism. They are only against White people having a place to live.

They say they oppose “racial segregation” but they spend all the time demonizing White people of the past that went to live in other races’ land.

Were the Amerindians “racist” when they fought the European conquerors? The anti-Whites always say that the Americas “belong” to the so-called “native” Americans (that is, the Amerindians who migrated there from Asia, but anyway) and that Whites should “go back to Europe”. According to anti-Whites, that’s not racist at all…

So, again, anti-Whites do NOT oppose racial segregation. They ONLY oppose a world with White children in it.

I focus on destroying anti-whites verbally via mini-Mantras and Mantra thinking in the Opposing Views section of Stormfront.

And I’m loving it. They can do nothing against it. All they can do is deny or insult. Usually they simply vanish.

I agree with the idea that we should stick to what is useful.

In that respect, the Mantra seems to become useless when we mix it with the topics that the unawaken white person has been brainwashed to dismiss. What topics are those? Well, everything not included in the Mantra.

I think we had better keep in mind that the Mantra is designed as a propaganda tool with the specific goal of awakening the average white person to the ugly truth of the ongoing program of genocide against our people.

All the other things we do, everything else non-Mantra, is education. The problem is, the average white person has been programed to dismiss every single piece of education if it is pro-white, no matter how true that information might be.

Education is good for those of us who are already racially awaken.

Therefore, in my opinion we should separate propaganda and education. When addressing the unawaken white people, we should use the Mantra to awaken them. Only after that will they accept pro-white education.

To sum up:

1) Separate propaganda and education
2) Use propaganda first
3) THEN use education

Which translates into this:

1) Use the Mantra and only the Mantra
2) THEN use everything else

Just my opinion.

Hello,
I’m still a beginner with Mantra-spreading so after the first rush of enthusiasm, some questions have appeared in my mind.

Firstly, I’d like to ask your opinion about this: should I copy-and-paste the talking points and mini mantras or should I try and make those points with my own words?

My first guess is that, since those points are actually consistent, there is no problem in copy-pasting, but I’m afraid of looking like a parrot who just repeats things.

What are your thoughts?

Greetings.

Since I’m a pro-White, Catalan Nationalist, I’ve personally made a translation of the Mantra into Catalan language. This language is spoken by 9 million people in the Mediterranean Region.

Here you go:

Tothom diu que hi ha un problema RACIAL. Tothom diu que aquest problema RACIAL es resoldrà quan el Tercer Món inundi TOTS els països blancs i NOMÉS els països blancs.

Els Països Baixos i Bèlgica estan tan poblats com el Japó o Taiwan, però ningú no diu que el Japó o Taiwan resoldran el problema RACIAL a força d’importar milions de tercermundistes i “assimilant-s’hi”.

Tothom diu que la solució final per al problema RACIAL és que els nadius de TOTS els països blancs i NOMÉS dels països blancs “assimilin”, o sigui, es barregin amb tots aquests no-blancs.

Què passaria si jo deia que hi ha un problema RACIAL i que aquest problema RACIAL es resoldria només si centenars de milions de no-negres anessin a TOTS els països negres i NOMÉS als països negres?

Quant trigaria qualsevol persona a adonar-se que no estaria parlant d’un problema RACIAL, sinó que estaria parlant de la solució final per al problema NEGRE?

I quant trigaria qualsevol negre assenyat a adonar-se’n? I quina mena de negre psicòtic no s’hi oposaria?

Però si explico aquesta veritat tan òbvia sobre el programa de genocidi dut a terme contra la meva raça, la raça blanca, tant els progressistes com els conservadors respectables estaran d’acord que sóc un naziquevolmatarsismilionsdejueus.

Ells diuen que són antiracistes. El que són és antiblancs.

“Antiracista” en realitat vol dir “antiblanc”.