B. U. G. S.

@dungeoneer “If you don`t want to use the mantra then don`t,but don`t clog up our working area devoted to helping people who DO.”

I’m thinking of the people you can’t reach, which are the majority of anti-Whites. If you consider that clogging, I think you’ve got the wrong idea.

@PeterWhiterabbit said it: “You won’t convince anyone who takes the political correctness religion seriously”

They all take it seriously.

@cody “If you think it is “not a big deal” if White people are Blended out of existence, then nominate a non-White people to blend out of existence. You can prove you are not just Anti-White by picking a non-White country where you would like to replace the present population with a new one. ”

“are you asking this because you have experiences of difficulty in dealing with anti-whites when they bring up equality when you’re engaging them, or is this simple an idea (theory) about a potential problem with the mantra?”

Anti-Whites don’t see it as replacing a population with “a new one” since they believe in equality. “A new population” suggests a population with important differences, which anti-Whites are spurned for ever considering. I have difficulty awakening some who believe in equality. The mantra still works on some people when they think they’d be violating the rights other races by replacing them. But after mulling it over for a time, they rationalize it with “equality.”

If and when the mantra is dissected by the mainstream media, the media will “remind everyone” of their “programming”, that there is no such thing as replacing a population with a new one since all races are equal.

@dungeoneer In case you haven’t noticed, I have used the mantra tons of times in the “Where…II” thread. You seem to acknowledge that the common cause of all Bugsters’ awakenings is the recognition of racial inequality. If that’s the cause of your awakening, how can someone else be awakened without that same understanding?

Anti-Whites can’t care about genocide by assimilation if they believe everyone is equal. They believe Whites are doing the exact equivalent of assimilating with themselves when they assimilate with other races. Equality is the whole foundation of anti-racism and the genocide, and we do not attack that foundation. Bob even says to avoid debating inequality.

@PeterWhiterabbit “every White nations and ONLY White nations” does not cover racial inequality. It covers an injustice being done to Whites that can only be seen as an injustice if you believe the races aren’t equal.

@ Genseric

Yes, I meant Swarm, sorry. And thanks…I hope it sounds short and pithy enough, as Harumphty has said.

It is hard work to swarm. I am not that good at it but I think you are making a difference in people.

It’s especially hard if you don’t like watching anti-White videos or reading anti-White comments. I don’t know if it’s better to stay and chat or just post and run.

I have had large chat rooms of people become receptive after hearing the mantra, but the chatters wanted proof that all White countries were facing immigration problems. Since I could not give proof, they didn’t fully become WN. My point is that while mantra speech is effective, people want to be sure there is a genocide happening. I asked how to prove the genocide pages ago because of this.
The average person doesn’t have any awareness of other countries’ immigration problems, legal or illegal.

A quick note on the importance of race: Race is a matter of genetics, and according to psychology, genetics affects everything about people, including intelligence, personality, and behavior. To deny the importance of race is to deny science, therefore. Perhaps this can be worked into some talking points.

It is proven that genetics accounts for %50 of a person’s intelligence, and a certain percentage of a person’s personality.

Request: brief and thorough proof that all White countries and only White countries are facing massive immigration and assimilation, for the naysayers.

It would be great for you all to form a simple guide that has Mantra rebuttals for every argument anti-Whites make. Rebuttals where their argument is refuted and brought back to the subject of genocide. That way a person could just paste, and it would also organize the dilemma of White genocide into a comprehensive and irrefutable document.

The guide could receive updates regularly and work in conjunction with the Whitestone Genocide Evidence Database, at http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/topic/whitestone/

People will always say things like, prove all White countries are facing this sort of genocide, prove no non-white countries are facing this genocide, prove that it results in a future with no more White people, prove that it matters whether Whites exist or not, and on and on. How can you prove to someone what’s going on with other countries’ immigration policies and anti-Whiteness if they don’t already know? People ask “who is causing the genocide?” How can you prove that the media and government are partly to blame for this genocide? When people hear Mantra dialogue, they do become interested, but their eyes shut fast again if you don’t have a proper rebuttal for them for their concerns.

Forgive me if I’m over-thinking it. But the Mantra always brings a response, and how many of us can always answer every response perfectly? The exchange that takes place after they hear the Mantra is often what determines whether they become pro-White or remain anti.

For me, if someone proclaims that equality negates White genocide’s importance, it makes the Mantra lose its effectiveness to onlookers. Then I wind up having to justify why race matters in the first place for the Mantra to be useful, which means arguing against equality. I think I have seen it mentioned that sometimes you should just move along rather than debate facts. Yes, they don’t really care about facts. But they claim equality is a fact.

Many anti-Whites say they would support our same genocide for all non-White countries because of equality. At that point you can’t win them over by proclaiming the hypocrisy of massive non-White immigration and forced assimilation into every White nation and only in White nations, and worse, they appear righteous and correct in the eyes of onlookers for their belief in equality.

I don’t think you would imply that only those who don’t already believe in equality will be affected by the Mantra. But equality is the first thing that pops in many people’s minds.

@Scrivener

This brings up a good question that I can’t figure out. If someone believes in complete equality, how can White genocide in the form race-melding ever matter to them? The Mantra loses its effect on the listener if all races are believed to be equal. Why would it matter that only White countries are for everyone when race is considered merely a social construct by the listener?