In the America of respectable conservatives, the term “undocumented worker” is perfectly accurate. In a paper country, why should one person be allowed to work on one side of the border and another not? To respectable conservatives, there is nothing racial or inherited or even cultural about Americans. To conservatives, being an America is entirely a matter of paperwork.
Why should one Julio get five times the wages of another Julio because he has papers?
When the Immigration and Naturalization Acts were passed in 1921 and 1923, it was decided that America was made up of a certain people, and immigration would keep that identity. Calling something illegal immigration made sense, since those laws followed a racial and cultural policy.
But for a melting pot, where the choice of citizens is openly random, no one can really take the word “illegal” seriously. In terms of American policy today, nothing about you matters except the papers.
The documents.
The term “undocumented worker” should be “undocumented citizen.” A bumper sticker ought to say, “I’m not a citizen, I’m just documented.”
Our borders are collapsing because we have declared they no longer make any sense.
A melting pot cannot be selective.
#1 by Tim on 08/12/2009 - 3:43 pm
Speaking of melting pots. A picture is worth a thousand words. Well flip through these for a second and it is worth 10’s of thousands.
Ben Stein talks about Jews running Hollywood. Well he was not kidding. I knew hebrews were running movie studios. BUT I had no idea that even Harry Potter was Jewish!
I had to share that. Since a certain party believes that the “melting pot” is not for them.
http://cbs2chicago.com/slideshows/jewish.celebrities.hollywood.20.879851.html
#2 by Dave on 08/12/2009 - 7:46 pm
The progeny of the nonwhite invaders will get political rights, even if their parents don’t.
This process is now very old and the irony is you can trace the devaluation of citizenship rights in America along the same axis as the increase in the absolute numbers of nonwhites obtaining “citizenship”.
As BW has maintains: There is no such thing as a free society that is also multiracial. That’s because there is no way to confer meaningful political rights to a multiracial population as a whole.
There is also no reason to be loyal to such a system and the only reason nonwhites are loyal to it is because it facilitates nonwhite access to the products of white people.
#3 by Simmons on 08/13/2009 - 9:17 am
A trillion words have been written about the downfall of Rome, and most of them were wasted time. Rome simply ran out of Romans as America runs out of Americans.
Even PC cannot hide the notion that the 900,000 blacks living in squalor in Detroit are not in much sense American. A non-white immigrant if he was told he could immigrate to either America or Detroit would with no sense of irony choose America. Ask the Detroiters what they think of America. But whole wordism systems are built on the fallacies that Detroiters are American, what a hoot.
As for Tim I hope he is not obsessed with Jews because posting that sad melange of faces of judaism reminds me of what a shitty cult being a jew is. No wonder they fly under the radar, any hint they would be subject to inquiry as to what being a jew consisted of would break them rather quick.
#4 by Tim on 08/14/2009 - 8:06 am
Simmons,
Don’t worry. I have been reading this blog for far to too long to get caught up in the joo thing.
But every once in a while even I go stormfrontish for a second or too.
The names on the link did not surprise me. BUT one name did —the Harry Potter kid. It should not have surprised me at all. Since I always comment when watching a new Harry Potter that the Nordic kid who is pure and obsessed with purity is the devilish villain (of course he is blond). Harry Potter LOOKED aryan to me as well (brown hair and blue eyes and easy going –not a scitso hebrew). NOW I know. Now the movie fits back into my world view.
I knew that Harry Potter was making a multicultural multiracial point (with lots of hidden subtlety). Now it makes total sense.
If it was not for the fact that our enemies are sooo damn consistent…..Aryans would never get it. Our enemies are not gifted with originality.
Now I am going to openly root for the villain in the harry potter movies.
#5 by Simmons on 08/14/2009 - 10:53 am
Dave says blacks “absolutly love” whites, well IF that is true then Jews are possessed with whites and being white. I watch them like a hawk, but now its not in a Stormfront way but like a visitor to the zoo.
We all should have figured this out right after Kubrick took Clarke’s book on white evolution (what other kind is there?) and made it into a long sappy trip thru space.
Blacks just want white bling, they simply do not have enough brain power to comprehend anything more than double duece wheels and air conditioning, but jews are decidely perplexed, and insanely jealous of anything of beauty produced by whites.
What this means is all that shrieking at them like they are our equals only empowers them. Its like the Grand Magistrate of Her Highness the Queen having a shouting match with a thief of the Bazaar, mostly a waste of time. Not saying a loud voice or a commanding tone is not needed, but whiny shrill outbursts only show weakness, not power.
Power is an informed white man asking the right questions at the right time.